Search

Notices

Contract negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Today | 03:01 PM
  #3501  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 327
Likes: 10
From: AB
Default

Originally Posted by CptGSXR
Guess the FO that said it was correct after all. Progress but no deal.
Did you misread the email? We have a deal… a completed deal. That’s what a “agreement in principle” means.

Now they have to put it from mediation notes into actual language and send it to us for a vote. Nothing different than when SWA or Delta got AIP’s. Ask google for some examples.

It may be a garbage deal, but it’s still a deal nonetheless.
Reply
Old Today | 03:03 PM
  #3502  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 503
Likes: 63
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by JustWatching
Did you misread the email? We have a deal… a completed deal. That’s what a “agreement in principle” means.

Now they have to put it from mediation notes into actual language and send it to us for a vote. Nothing different than when SWA or Delta got AIP’s. Ask google for some examples.

It may be a garbage deal, but it’s still a deal nonetheless.
AIP is not a complete deal or we would have the entire deal sent to us already.
Reply
Old Today | 03:04 PM
  #3503  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 327
Likes: 10
From: AB
Default

Originally Posted by pipercub
What info that has been given that makes you thing we are not getting Rolled by the current EXCO. The lack of real info should be concerning. Just keep pushing it past the 13th at all cost.
Just curious.. .When other airlines announce to their pilots an AIP, does it immediately include a bullet list of changes and improvements, or does that follow soon after? I’m not saying that email was stellar by ANY means, but we were notified of an agreement. Now they have to put it all together for us to vote on. Expecting it all at once is short sighted.
Reply
Old Today | 03:06 PM
  #3504  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 327
Likes: 10
From: AB
Default

Originally Posted by pipercub
AIP is not a complete deal or we would have the entire deal sent to us already.
I’m sorry, but you’re absolutely incorrect. Ask your friends at other airlines how their process went. They aren’t given the entire TA or bullet points the second the AIP is announced.



AI Overview Once an airline pilot Agreement in Principle (AIP) is announced, detailed terms typically emerge within a few days to two weeks, as negotiators often have the language ready, though holiday periods can cause delays. In high-stakes cases, initial details can be finalized or leaked quickly, while full contractual language for a ratification vote may take slightly longer.Key Details on AIP Timelines:Negotiation Finalization: If the language is largely written, it can take only days to finalize.Union Process: The Master Executive Council (MEC) usually needs roughly a week to review the details before voting to send it to the rank and file.Drafting & Legal Review: Even with a tentative agreement, drafting the final contract language can take a few "turns" with the company, potentially lasting up to 14 days.
Reply
Old Today | 03:06 PM
  #3505  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 503
Likes: 63
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by JustWatching
Just curious.. .When other airlines announce to their pilots an AIP, does it immediately include a bullet list of changes and improvements, or does that follow soon after? I’m not saying that email was stellar by ANY means, but we were notified of an agreement. Now they have to put it all together for us to vote on. Expecting it all at once is short sighted.
To my recollection, in over 20 years every AIP Announcement comes with a bulleted overview of the agreement. More detailed info is usually only posted to inside union websites. They fact we get no info and as far as I can currently tell neither side as put out a press release to the public which is a normal practice also.
Reply
Old Today | 04:21 PM
  #3506  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 37
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
2 years of GU absolutely made us weaker but that I don’t blame RJ because the alternative to GU would have been more Robles and you should know how I feel about him by now. TLDR: Robles and GU are in a mortal deadlock for who did more damage to Allegiant pilots.

there’s too much gray area imo to litigate whether more Robles or GU trusteeship was worse.


i am just talking about January to the present. Since that time RJ did exactly what he was elected to do. The alternative would have been JR, Jay, J Allen, and the GU mafia. RJ is absolutely better. There is no way we would have even gotten PBS done if the old regime were still in power. Never forget the mantra of the old IBT regime is that they are COWARDS. They are terrified of making a deal because they are thin-skinned, hyper sensitive, ego maniacs that would rather do nothing than agree to a deal.

had the Unity team won we would have rolled into JCBA without a bridge/contract, and gotten destroyed at SLI and then JR, Jay and GU would have used their only playbill and screamed that the arbitrator was in management payroll/corrupt and that is why we all lost a decade in a relative seniority to SY pilots.

That is the only game the IBT knows because they are all cowards and too afraid to make a deal. They’d rather just blame others, tell us that the mediators are corrupt, the NMB is corrupt, management is bribing ppl, etc.

I think if RJ gets anything done it will be better than whatever the old regime could have done. It takes real cajones and leaderships to make a decision when all the options suck.
Cmon, yeah cut your nose off to spite your face. There is no way Robles was worse than the trusteeship. Just think of it from a contract perspective…90% of the sections we TA’d were under the previous Eboard. GU and his guys TA’d one or two (that were mostly done when they arrived) and RJ didn’t TA any. Given that math we probably would have been done with this in 2013 if the trusteeship hadn’t happened. Hate Robles if you want to, I don’t think he was perfect either but you have to admit what was done to this pilot group by the IBT probably should be looked at by the DOL for racketeering and fraud and RJ was part of that.
I get you think of RJs cajones a lot but this bridge isn’t an accomplishment it’s assuredly not what he was elected to do since the merger wasn’t in anyone’s mind at the time…he failed upward into the president position because the alternative was unthinkable and then succeeded in accepting something that’s subpar to what we were offered 2 years ago(mark my words). As far as PBS goes, it’s done because he abandoned the Block award…the damage that will cause is yet to be known. But keep carrying that torch!


Reply
Old Today | 04:29 PM
  #3507  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 503
Likes: 63
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Hightime80
Cmon, yeah cut your nose off to spite your face. There is no way Robles was worse than the trusteeship. Just think of it from a contract perspective…90% of the sections we TA’d were under the previous Eboard. GU and his guys TA’d one or two (that were mostly done when they arrived) and RJ didn’t TA any. Given that math we probably would have been done with this in 2013 if the trusteeship hadn’t happened. Hate Robles if you want to, I don’t think he was perfect either but you have to admit what was done to this pilot group by the IBT probably should be looked at by the DOL for racketeering and fraud and RJ was part of that.
I get you think of RJs cajones a lot but this bridge isn’t an accomplishment it’s assuredly not what he was elected to do since the merger wasn’t in anyone’s mind at the time…he failed upward into the president position because the alternative was unthinkable and then succeeded in accepting something that’s subpar to what we were offered 2 years ago(mark my words). As far as PBS goes, it’s done because he abandoned the Block award…the damage that will cause is yet to be known. But keep carrying that torch!
Yep, and it should not be taking weeks to get the crap stripped down excuse of a contract actually out to the pilots.
Reply
Old Today | 04:38 PM
  #3508  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 180
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by JustWatching
Did you misread the email? We have a deal… a completed deal. That’s what a “agreement in principle” means.

Now they have to put it from mediation notes into actual language and send it to us for a vote. Nothing different than when SWA or Delta got AIP’s. Ask google for some examples.

It may be a garbage deal, but it’s still a deal nonetheless.
It's NOT a deal.....that's what "PRINCIPLE" means in agreement in principle.

While the chances are slim, it could still take months to finalize. Nothing is stopping them from pulling the deal anytime they want. Mediator won't even blink. 6 months from now is holiday 2026......
Reply
Old Today | 04:56 PM
  #3509  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,758
Likes: 106
From: 1900D CA
Default

Outsider looking in

Curious how long negotiations took?

Please post up a summary when it's available.

Hoping the best for you all, raise the bar!

Congratulations
Reply
Old Today | 04:58 PM
  #3510  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 503
Likes: 63
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900
Outsider looking in

Curious how long negotiations took?

Please post up a summary when it's available.

Hoping the best for you all, raise the bar!

Congratulations
We have been at it 5 years or so. There is almost zero chance we will raise any bar. We will be lucky to be a bit closer at the bottom of the pack.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
tallplt
Major
28
06-17-2012 10:23 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
ITSALLGOOD
Major
1
07-07-2007 08:34 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices