MasterOfPuppets

Oscar is CEO but he is really just a figure head. Everyone at United knows Kirby has been running the show for a while now.

Oscar didn’t know airlines he was a train guy. The first thing he did was improve employee moral and any good CEO could do that. He then went shopping for N airline guy and that’s when Kirby stepped in. As soon as Kirby stepped on property United exploded. Our route network got immediately stronger our domestic presence was boosted and we opened markets all over the world and grew like crazy.

If Parker would have left and Kirby had become the CEO at AA I would be leaving UA to work there. UA had two investors take control of the board and Wall Street was demanding we close IAD/DEN and LAX. United would be in really bad shape right now. AA giving up Kirby was a mistake.

As far as Kirbys bravado on RJs.....who cares? He has to go through me to get them, and I know where my vote stands. I’m not scared, and neither are any United pilots, of a guy who wants to get rid of SCOPE, he can tak all he wants. I never understood why your group hated him because he was doing his job, all CEOs say the same thing.

Buzzlightyear

MOP fair enough.

rightside02

Agree ... if scope gets relaxed it’s out own dam fault ... he can ask and he can be denied .

mainlineAF

Hold up. You’d give up however long you’ve been at united to go to AA if Kirby became AA CEO?

MasterOfPuppets

If it wasn’t for Kirby we would be in really bad shape at UA right now. Between Tilton burning the furniture and Smizek bowing down to the pressures of wall street the amount of damage that was done to UA over the last 2 decades was dang near devastating. Put on top of that the two activist investors that got on the board......United would be a really bad place right now.

Oscar fixed the moral and finished the merger and Kirby got United back to growing and collecting its rightful market share. There are plenty of articles out there that describe haw bad things were and how good things are getting now. Kirby took an airline that was circling the drain and in 3 years closed the gap on DL in all metrics. UA is a proud company again and I think it will continue going in that direction.

So to answer your question if it wasn’t for Kirby I may not have a choice but to join AA. If Kirby was given the reigns at AA and he grew it like he did at UA, AA would have been an unstoppable powerhouse. AA would be fighting DL at the top and UA would be shrinking to profitability while closing hubs. A down turn would have killed us.

SaturnV

Putting down the UAL/Kirby kool-aid for minute might not be a terrible idea. I’m not sure the demand for the United brand is anywhere near the demand for the Delta brand right now.

But if United really is this highly coveted, desirable, industry force that pax can’t imagine flying anyone other than United, please excuse my ignorance for not seeing it.

You would have “no choice but to join AA” I would love to know what Pilot Recruitment’s reaction would have been in this dream scenario when you called to tell them mismanagement at UAL was forcing you to come over and when to expect to see you in one of their newhire classes.

MasterOfPuppets

I didn’t say any of that......

AAL24

If I had less than 5 years seniority at AA I would consider jumping ship. 900 retirements/year at an airline with major issues or 600 retirements/year at a thriving airline growing 5% year after year. Seems like a no brainer to me. AA’s last stronghold was bought out from under them with the LATAM deal.

Parker either fights back or burns the furniture for the next decade. He never seemed like a manager who likes growing the airline organically so I’m guessing AA flounders to the point of being a deep #3 and then announces a merger with JetBlue or Alaska to save the company. Seniority battle ensues, etc etc. It’s the only play Parker knows and it makes the guys/gals at the top very wealthy.


I think Jamie Baker said it best a couple years ago...
“We all remember a time when United couldn’t punch its way out of a paper bag, when they were the perennial last-place member of the big three,” Baker said, as he questioned American CEO Doug Parker. “What I’m being asked right now from investors is whether American has now simply stepped into the shoes that United once occupied.”

“Maybe that is simply the construct of the industry going forward,” Baker said. “You’re going to have one chronic outperformer, let’s call that Delta, in fairness. You have the silver medalist, let’s call it United, and then inevitably American brings up the rear. So, how do you push back on that?”

American executives have already spent much of the call outlining American’s favorable prospects and Parker did not reiterate them in response to Baker’s question. Rather, he declared, “We vehemently disagree.”

Baker, seemingly unimpressed, wrote in a July 31 report that, “American did a poor job defending its longer-term potential as part of the Big Three construct.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/tedreed/2018/08/06/has-american-slipped-behind-united-to-become-the-number-three-airline-a-top-analyst-says-it-has/amp/

Hueypilot

I’m not a Parker hater per se (he’s a CEO that does CEO-y things...that’s his job). But he’s not particularly good at running a highly competitive airline. He’s OK-ish at muddling through, and that was just fine at AW and Airways. But now that the industry has consolidated, the company needs to be thinking ahead. Time for Parker to go and get replaced with someone with a little boldness and vision.

SaturnV

Just re-read your post. You are correct you said closed the gap on Delta with the regards to METRICS. I mistakenly just read closed the “gap on Delta”. I appologize.

I’m still not sure what you meant by “if it wasn’t for Kirby you may have been forced to join AA” were you implying that if UA went under you would have a job at AA waiting for you? Anyways I’m probably reading too much into that. I won’t derail things further. Carry-on.