![]() |
I don’t think AA can afford to stop hiring. We are still behind in staffing, and retirements won’t be stopping. The more off the top, means less likely of a furlough due to cost savings. Wasn’t the company break even point 2 years on a furloughed pilot? Someone much smarter than me had a graph of that but I can’t find it.
|
Originally Posted by rcflying53
(Post 2990691)
I don’t think AA can afford to stop hiring. We are still behind in staffing, and retirements won’t be stopping. The more off the top, means less likely of a furlough due to cost savings. Wasn’t the company break even point 2 years on a furloughed pilot? Someone much smarter than me had a graph of that but I can’t find it.
|
Originally Posted by BOGSAT
(Post 2987325)
We have to keep hiring to keep up with retirements.
|
Originally Posted by SparrowBird
(Post 2988635)
out of the majors they are probably least likely to stop as there are more retirements in 2020 than both dal and ual combined. They might reduce but not stop.
APC 2020 retirement numbers: AAL: 772 DAL 549 + UAL 366 = 915 |
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 2990807)
Not quite....assuming the APC numbers are correct:
APC 2020 retirement numbers: AAL: 772 DAL 549 + UAL 366 = 915 |
Originally Posted by rcflying53
(Post 2990691)
I don’t think AA can afford to stop hiring.
that’s today’s plan anyway. |
Originally Posted by Dunkin
(Post 2990851)
Those are mandatory retirement numbers only, plenty more are bailing out early and using months of sick time in the process.
|
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 2990916)
But the early outs are happening at all the airlines, so I assume it’s a push.
|
Originally Posted by daOldMan
(Post 2990939)
American has WAY more pilots over the age 60. There are significantly more "early outs" between 60-64, so there are likely far more at AA. Look at the AA mandatory retirements for the next 5 years.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:04 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands