Search
Notices

Thoughts on Bailouts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2020, 08:18 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv View Post
Dobbs,
Im not mgmt and it's almost impossible to structure a company to survive no to little revenue fro 1-6months. Your proposal to just stockpile Billions and Billions of profits in cash accounts is not something that capitalist companies do. They have a BOD who manage the company to make as much profit as possible. If they have extra they can reinvest in stuff, grow, pay people more, increase a dividend or buy back shares in the company. The mgmt and BOD have to decide the best use of the money and each has positives and negatives. Because certain companies refuse to repatriate their profits from other countries (like Apple etc) and have huge cash balances outside the US, that is a function of the US tax code and not good corporate governance.
I agree with you in regards to not surviving without revenue, duh!
Dobbs18 is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 09:51 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slick111's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 742
Default

I've been reading that the city of Las Vegas, (and state of Nevada) is, for all practical purposes, shut down.

So just out of curiosity, I checked on flights to Vegas tomorrow. We have 11 mostly empty flights tomorrow going from Dallas to Vegas. We have 8 mostly empty flights going to Vegas from LAX. Four from Chicago to Vegas. And Miami is showing 3 mostly empty flights to Vegas. I didn't bother the check other "hub to Vegas" flights.

Who's not making the easy decision to pair down these flights?
Slick111 is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 11:14 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,095
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111 View Post
I've been reading that the city of Las Vegas, (and state of Nevada) is, for all practical purposes, shut down.

So just out of curiosity, I checked on flights to Vegas tomorrow. We have 11 mostly empty flights tomorrow going from Dallas to Vegas. We have 8 mostly empty flights going to Vegas from LAX. Four from Chicago to Vegas. And Miami is showing 3 mostly empty flights to Vegas. I didn't bother the check other "hub to Vegas" flights.

Who's not making the easy decision to pair down these flights?
I'm not sure but I'm guessing they are probably going to be canceled for April.
Name User is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 11:18 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111 View Post
So just out of curiosity, I checked on flights to Vegas tomorrow. We have 11 mostly empty flights tomorrow going from Dallas to Vegas. We have 8 mostly empty flights going to Vegas from LAX. Four from Chicago to Vegas. And Miami is showing 3 mostly empty flights to Vegas. I didn't bother the check other "hub to Vegas" flights.

Who's not making the easy decision to pair down these flights?
Going to 50% of this flying (ie, 5 vs 11 flights) would still be PLENTY of lift. Do a morning flight, midday flight, evening flight and a late night flight or whatever lines up best + 1 more even. The gas, landing fees, pilot and crew costs... the net income per flight has got to be terrible (before even paying for the airplane and company staff that are sitting around as huge fixed overhead)
dynap09 is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 03:48 PM
  #45  
Eating A Gruben
 
sanicom3205's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,065
Default

The amount of gas I burned today alone, with almost no passengers, would pay my salary for a year. Gonna make furlough that much harder to stomach
sanicom3205 is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 04:59 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Buzzlightyear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 569
Default

Originally Posted by Cicada View Post
Last time, when the banks were collapsing into themselves, they were getting told to merge with others, or go out of business.
Dont be surprised to see some forced marriages of the weakest carriers into others. You could easily see JBlue, Alaska and others get forced marriages with larger carriers as a requirement of a bailout. It could get that bad.
No. The arranged mergers were because of counter party risk. Each party was matched with their partner based on their CDO contracts. This came about after each party refused to take losses on these contracts. Airlines have no counter party risk and majors aren’t dependent on the others as a function of business.
Buzzlightyear is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 07:32 PM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Ashes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 64
Default

...because of course the raccoons and the high-functioning sociopaths are out in force on this, looking to get their private losses socialized and their private gains locked in....
Ashes is offline  
Old 03-19-2020, 07:53 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Default

I’m kinda done hearing about the buybacks. The more I learn about the cash on hand vs assets vs debt vs stock price, the more I think those complaining about the buybacks just don’t get it, and don’t want to.

But I get that the public is going to run with it.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 03-20-2020, 05:39 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Andrew_VT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 584
Default

Wow that was an incredible article. Everyone should read that.
Andrew_VT is offline  
Old 03-20-2020, 10:11 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JulesWinfield's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,240
Default

Originally Posted by sanicom3205 View Post
The amount of gas I burned today alone, with almost no passengers, would pay my salary for a year. Gonna make furlough that much harder to stomach
Yes. I don't get it at all. The entire industry is taking crazy pills. It's almost like they're trying to inflate their losses to get more bailout money or something, and then hammer us on the backend to take more leave and furloughs. It's sickening.

Originally Posted by highfarfast View Post
I’m kinda done hearing about the buybacks. The more I learn about the cash on hand vs assets vs debt vs stock price, the more I think those complaining about the buybacks just don’t get it, and don’t want to.

But I get that the public is going to run with it.
You don't see a problem with taking on debt and investing that into artificially inflating stock prices and then asking for government money when something happens to lower the value of that stock?
JulesWinfield is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedOverWhite
Corporate
8
05-02-2016 12:22 AM
Hound
Cargo
93
08-15-2014 05:32 PM
jmcclellan
Major
6
10-09-2009 03:31 AM
FXDX
Cargo
3
08-07-2007 07:58 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
14
04-25-2007 09:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices