Search
Notices

How long will it last?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2020, 06:36 AM
  #171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by bababouey View Post
Chris reed isn’t the only one, but the people who post that they will be fine, but are obviously obsessed with the topic really annoy me. You may be fine, but you hope this career works out, be honest. Will my family be fine? Yes. Will they be better if AA survives? Certainly.

I think you would find that the majority of people posting doomsday scenarios on APC almost everyday, are they ones not handling it well. They use it to elicit a response that things won’t be as bad as they think or are just finding a way to cope. IMO.
nuball5 is offline  
Old 10-16-2020, 07:30 AM
  #172  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,615
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs View Post
No one else is furloughing?

Delta starts Nov 1
United took huge paycuts in form of reduced hours to stop furloughs
Even SWA says they will furlough without concessions
Except that SWA furlough threat, at least amongst the pilot group, seems pretty hollow because if we fly the published schedule in January 2021, the company will have to bring back many people who took ExTO a few months back. That's why it seems like every group is telling the company to pound sand and calling their bluff on the furlough threat.

With respect to AA making it, I'm pretty sure AA will make it. But should the unthinkable happen, I disagree with the notion that the 117,000 jobs would be lost forever. Seniority would be lost, but many jobs would be essentially reallocated to other airlines. Let's suppose a legacy carrier goes away. It would spawn a major race between the remaining 3 major carriers to fill in the void and grab as many assets as possible, and that's not taking into account ULCC's who would also step up. Pretty sure any furloughs would be cancelled pretty much everywhere and the hiring would spin up about as fast as possible.

An example of this on a smaller scale in recent history would be what ensued in Hawaii in 2008 when Aloha Airlines went out of business because they had way too much debt and no DIP financing. 61 year old airline, and one of the largest private employers in the state went out of business in literally days. The net effect, Hawaiian Air was the big winner and they absorbed many former Aloha employees, pilots included. Also, given the surge, many of those pilots had a relatively quick upgrade because Hawaiian had to fill a big void in a short order. That's what I suspect would happen should a legacy carrier go under now. No, it wouldn't be pretty, but it wouldn't be the end of the world either as most folks would land on their feet elsewhere.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 10-16-2020, 07:56 AM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by LonesomeSky View Post
American Airlines is too big to fail.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.


Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
C5Drvr is offline  
Old 10-16-2020, 09:07 AM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB View Post
777-200s are still here because they are doing cargo runs and they are trying them on new routes like jfk-lax in Nov
Sure. Are they profitable from a fleet perspective (ie keeping all the pilots paid, sims going, etc) or just on a per flight basis though? In other words do the cargo flights defray the cost of keeping them on or simply mitigate some of the cost?

I was curious they pulled the 321T off the LAX JFK runs and put the triple on it. Right now it's only for nov. We'll have to see after the Dec schedule loads what happens then. Amazingly, we used to do 12 a day between those city pairs on the 321T. It's just so hard to imagine all the business we used to do, seems like so long ago.
Name User is offline  
Old 10-16-2020, 09:20 AM
  #175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,728
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
It's just so hard to imagine all the business we used to do, seems like so long ago.
Soooo true!
biigD is offline  
Old 10-16-2020, 09:46 AM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Default

Obviously AA has been taking on huge loans to ride this thing out. Assuming they meet their goal of being cash burn neutral by the end of the year (I know DAL & UAL won’t, but probably by next summer), what would stop AA from returning the money they didn’t need to lenders? Assuming the loan terms allow that.
El Peso is offline  
Old 10-16-2020, 10:04 AM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bababouey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
Sure. Are they profitable from a fleet perspective (ie keeping all the pilots paid, sims going, etc) or just on a per flight basis though? In other words do the cargo flights defray the cost of keeping them on or simply mitigate some of the cost?

I was curious they pulled the 321T off the LAX JFK runs and put the triple on it. Right now it's only for nov. We'll have to see after the Dec schedule loads what happens then. Amazingly, we used to do 12 a day between those city pairs on the 321T. It's just so hard to imagine all the business we used to do, seems like so long ago.
yep, a 777 had as many premium seats as 321t, but we just don’t need the frequency right now. Another route is jfk-lhr, we used to have 4 times a day in the triple, now done to just one, and it rarely has more than 50 people on it, I wish this was just a bad dream.
bababouey is offline  
Old 10-16-2020, 10:50 AM
  #178  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,503
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso View Post
Obviously AA has been taking on huge loans to ride this thing out. Assuming they meet their goal of being cash burn neutral by the end of the year (I know DAL & UAL won’t, but probably by next summer), what would stop AA from returning the money they didn’t need to lenders? Assuming the loan terms allow that.
Well, this summer they sold junk bonds at 12%. I don’t know if those bonds were callable or not. I would think not though.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-for-liquidity


They also raised a billion from sales of shares and another billion from the sales of convertible bonds. But I doubt that they can buy those back - at least not the shares - until they can pay back the federal loans they took under CARES 1 since that prohibits share buyback. And since the money they borrowed under Cares1 is currently theIr cheapest source for borrowing, I don’t think they will be doing share buybacks any time soon.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 10-16-2020, 08:09 PM
  #179  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,948
Default

Does my crystal ball says AA will go through Chapter 11, reorganize, and come out the other end? Yes, fairly good odds.

Will they go to Chapter 7, liquidate, and go out of business? I doubt that.

Will another major airline buy AA? I doubt it. Anti-trust.

Will bankruptcy result in AA buying another smaller airline? Fair odds.

Then I asked you crystal ball for a hot stock tip. It went dark.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 10-17-2020, 05:09 AM
  #180  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Airbus Driver
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by biigD View Post
Nobody is hiding from bad news - we’re all professionals and have a Plan B. Whether AA liquidates or I end up a 777 CA with a smoking hot FA bouncing on my lap - the decisions I make going forward don’t change. It’s one thing to state an opinion, but you post the same doom and gloom over and over again, and that tells me a little about your motivation.

You guys are being trolled by a regional pilot flow wanna be.
AB321Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BestForward
JetBlue
13827
10-30-2023 08:44 AM
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
1
11-02-2016 05:02 PM
TonyWilliams
Hiring News
2
10-24-2008 05:55 AM
Whacker77
Regional
40
05-22-2008 03:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices