Jumpseat Battle Brewing
#381
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 175
Then stop whining on a message board and do something about it if you feel it is not fair, not equal, getting bent over, and claiming victim status. Going on and on and on and on and on, here on this forum, isn't a good look for you or Republic pilots.
Cheers and have a good day, I know I am.
Cheers and have a good day, I know I am.
#382
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: Guppy
Posts: 761
Then stop whining on a message board and do something about it if you feel it is not fair, not equal, getting bent over, and claiming victim status. Going on and on and on and on and on, here on this forum, isn't a good look for you or Republic pilots.
Cheers and have a good day, I know I am.
Cheers and have a good day, I know I am.
You've taken one message outside of the context of a larger back-and-forth with one person.
Enjoy your day.
Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
#383
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: Jumpseat
Posts: 92
Everybody relax. The argument/uproar at AA was republic initiated ban on AA pilots getting any sort of priority on republic operated American Eagle aircraft. As an AA pilot, I would be equal priority (time of check in) with a Delta/UAL/FedEx/Spirit pilot on an American Eagle aircraft. Other than the *********s here, everyone wants republic to get this priority.
It’s an issue with the republic pilots, their management and AA management.
The heartburn comes from them deciding to take it out on the uninvolved AA pilots.
It’s an issue with the republic pilots, their management and AA management.
The heartburn comes from them deciding to take it out on the uninvolved AA pilots.
#384
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: Jumpseat
Posts: 92
AA management isn’t honoring the agreement.
AA pilots had nothing to do with this and supported the RAH pilots in their quest to get the agreement enforced.
Out of the blue RAH decides to punish the AA pilots.
Say what you want but if this same situation happened to UA or DL pilots you would feel the same way AA pilots do.
AA pilots had nothing to do with this and supported the RAH pilots in their quest to get the agreement enforced.
Out of the blue RAH decides to punish the AA pilots.
Say what you want but if this same situation happened to UA or DL pilots you would feel the same way AA pilots do.
Before this while disaster started i don’t think the issue of RAH flying for all 3 legacies was even brought up. It was only after a 700 post thread of insanity where it was debated.
AA pilots and the APA have fully supported the RAH pilots in their endeavor up to this point. We never wanted to place them at the end of the priority list.
I’m not sure how they ended up in their current predicament but i know for a fact it wasn’t bc APA or AA pilots in general wanted them there.
AA pilots and the APA have fully supported the RAH pilots in their endeavor up to this point. We never wanted to place them at the end of the priority list.
I’m not sure how they ended up in their current predicament but i know for a fact it wasn’t bc APA or AA pilots in general wanted them there.
filler/ten
#386
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Position: Sitting
Posts: 223
Same here. I've always flown planes and thought the airline pilot thing would be fun to give a try. I'm realizing it's not my thing and I'm heading back into my old field.
#387
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: Jumpseat
Posts: 92
stop wasting your breath sanicom, they have their own definition of reciprocal that fits their narrative and that's that. Well APA walked away from the table as they should, if this gets bad we all know who will come out on top, I hate to say that but it's true, I've seen it first hand, maybe not this exact situation but whenever a regional tries to flex its muscle against a major airline it usually doesn't end well for the regional. And for the record I was the regional guy when this happened, thankfully I moved on bc a regional should be nothing more than a stepping stone to move on from, and I didn't lose a wink of sleep over it...but hey rah rah rah unions, yeah!
Former EDV pilot here, now at AA...I remember this and having to battle AA once we opened up a NYC base too. AA would not give us unlimited JS privileges on their flights back in the day, meaning, if 1 other guy listed and got on via the JS, even if it was a seat in the back, an EDV pilot could not get on the aircraft! It was ridiculous. So we simply returned the favor and only aloud an AA pilot on our metal if he/she was the only one to get on via a JS listing. They changed their policy real quick. AA JS is so backwards compared to the rest of the industry, it has only gotten a little better since the merger, thankfully I live in base(former USAir base) and don't have to sweat this crap on a weekly basis. I agree with the RAH pilots on this one too, a couple of AA god complex pilots are making us look real bad.
#388
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 589
man that’s some good old digging there...and I brought this very same scenario back up on this thread...damnit I said I wouldn’t post on this again....but we weren’t asking for a higher tier or to put above ANYONE, OAL, NON-exclusive, or wtf ever else category y’all want to make up. We said hey if there is an empty seat on your plane can you please fill it. They agreed and that was that. We literally said if we are the last ones at the gate and you have no one else to board can we have a seat...not the same story here but I hope you can take solace in the fact that I have been on the other side before and STILL think you guys are wrong here...i re-read the post I was posting in and I didn’t quite understand then what y’all were seeking, I still do think AA’s OLD way of JSs was ass backwards and we do have some god-complex pilots here but both have been fixed or mostly fixed over time. Y’all do what you feel is right, we did at EDV at the time and it worked, however again it was not asking for priority over ANY pilot no matter who they flew for.
Last edited by Dobbs18; 05-05-2021 at 06:32 PM. Reason: Added content
#389
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: Jumpseat
Posts: 92
man that’s some good old digging there...and I brought this very same scenario back up on this thread...damnit I said I would post on this again....but we weren’t asking for a higher tier or to put above ANYONE, OAL, NON-exclusive, or wtf ever else category y’all want to make up. We said hey if there is an empty seat on your plane can you please fill it. They agreed and that was that. We literally said if we are the last ones at the gate and you have no one else to board can we have a seat...not the same story here but I hope you can take solace in the fact that I have been on the other side before and STILL think you guys are wrong here...
#390
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: Jumpseat
Posts: 92
man that’s some good old digging there...and I brought this very same scenario back up on this thread...damnit I said I wouldn’t post on this again....but we weren’t asking for a higher tier or to put above ANYONE, OAL, NON-exclusive, or wtf ever else category y’all want to make up. We said hey if there is an empty seat on your plane can you please fill it. They agreed and that was that. We literally said if we are the last ones at the gate and you have no one else to board can we have a seat...not the same story here but I hope you can take solace in the fact that I have been on the other side before and STILL think you guys are wrong here...i re-read the post I was posting in and I didn’t quite understand then what y’all were seeking, I still do think AA’s OLD way of JSs was ass backwards and we do have some god-complex pilots here but both have been fixed or mostly fixed over time. Y’all do what you feel is right, we did at EDV at the time and it worked, however again it was not asking for priority over ANY pilot no matter who they flew for.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post