Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
APA officially in negotiations with ALPA >

APA officially in negotiations with ALPA

Search

Notices

APA officially in negotiations with ALPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2025 | 03:10 PM
  #151  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 1,155
Default

Originally Posted by ClncClarence
No. Normal dues are 1%. During Section 6 they went up to 1.5%.

Because of the dues holiday, the effective rate for 2025 will be somewhere around 0.5%.
Ok, thanks. I had heard there was a higher rate in section 6, but didn't realize the 'normal' rate was an even 1%. That is pretty low. .5 is super low - what's the reasoning behind that?

I don't think anyone is ignorant of/arguing the fact that ALPA 'charges' a higher % than APA does, even with consistent refunds. (Yes, 1.85% is the current 'norm'. It was 1.9% until 6-8 years ago). IF y'all decide to rejoin ALPA, I hope y'all demand a permanently lower rate than even 1.5%, as a condition of bringing a 20% increase in membership with you.
Reply
Old 10-07-2025 | 04:48 PM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,114
Likes: 291
Default

A 0.5% increase in dues means $500/$100,000 earned. I dunno about y'all but arguing over $1000-$2000/yr in extra dues money is literally inconsequential at the end of the day - it's a rounding error on our W2s. Will that extra money get us a better contract? Who knows.

The $ paid is so little difference that I don't think that is something that should be talked about, because pilots are cheap and we'll do the absolute cheapest thing possible to our detriment (I am living proof).

Just IMO.
Reply
Old 10-07-2025 | 06:40 PM
  #153  
Config 3
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 191
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Ok, thanks. I had heard there was a higher rate in section 6, but didn't realize the 'normal' rate was an even 1%. That is pretty low. .5 is super low - what's the reasoning behind that?
The long and short is that APA suspended dues while the merger committee is doing its thing. Dues are not collected until there is some sort of resolution or the APA’s reserves reach $50M.

We have not paid dues since May or June…I can’t remember without checking paystubs.
Reply
Old 10-07-2025 | 06:59 PM
  #154  
biigD's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 127
Default

Name User is right - I don't know why we're discussing dues money. Seems like that's missing the big picture. I'd like to see a vote.
Reply
Old 10-08-2025 | 03:36 AM
  #155  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 86
Default

Originally Posted by tallpilot
AA pays 1%. I believe we've established DL and UA pay 1.5%. Smaller ALPA shops that I've worked for are 1.85%+.

It will be interesting to see if they can get it all the way down to 1%.

Are these dues also taken from retirement contributions?
401k funds are dues exempt, including any "spill" cash received once over the DC limits.
Reply
Old 10-08-2025 | 04:58 AM
  #156  
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
Bent over by buybacks
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 519
Default

Originally Posted by biigD
I'd like to see a vote.
There will only be a vote if APA and ALPA merger negotiators reach an agreement on dues, property, staffing, etc. I'm sure APA will want to have a guy as ALPA officer right off the bat. I kind of doubt there is going to be any agreement on those items. APA will overplay their hand, and ALPA will dig in. Just my opinion.
Reply
Old 10-08-2025 | 08:26 AM
  #157  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,847
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
There will only be a vote if APA and ALPA merger negotiators reach an agreement on dues, property, staffing, etc. I'm sure APA will want to have a guy as ALPA officer right off the bat.
That would only make sense, for a voluntary merger (vice revolt/decert scenario). Not sure why ALPA would have an issue, if the legacy APA rep(s) are that bad they'll lose their next election or get recalled. The good news would be they'd have some objective oversight from national in the meantime.
Reply
Old 10-08-2025 | 08:40 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 252
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
That would only make sense, for a voluntary merger (vice revolt/decert scenario). Not sure why ALPA would have an issue, if the legacy APA rep(s) are that bad they'll lose their next election or get recalled. The good news would be they'd have some objective oversight from national in the meantime.
I tend to agree with you, ALPA was pretty generous with FedEx. A successful agreement here also paves the way to bring Southwest and UPS into the fold later. Those are all positives for ALPA national. The biggest question in my mind is if APA wants this or if it's all a show to waste time and in the end say, we tried but couldn't make it work. Time will tell.
Reply
Old 10-08-2025 | 08:45 AM
  #159  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 341
Likes: 91
Default

Originally Posted by tallpilot
I tend to agree with you, ALPA was pretty generous with FedEx. A successful agreement here also paves the way to bring Southwest and UPS into the fold later. Those are all positives for ALPA national. The biggest question in my mind is if APA wants this or if it's all a show to waste time and in the end say, we tried but couldn't make it work. Time will tell.
It’s also a question whether the APA membership wants this. As a fence sitter, I’m all for a vote so we can put this to bed. But I am very skeptical as to whether it would pass a membership vote. Frankly, I’d be very surprised if it did.
Reply
Old 10-08-2025 | 09:43 AM
  #160  
Friendless
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 282
Likes: 32
Default

Originally Posted by dsevo
It’s also a question whether the APA membership wants this. As a fence sitter, I’m all for a vote so we can put this to bed. But I am very skeptical as to whether it would pass a membership vote. Frankly, I’d be very surprised if it did.
I don’t think there will be enough yes voters to outweigh the non-voters that get counted as no votes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jerryleber
=> United Contract 2022
61
09-02-2022 11:51 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
heykerrdog
Union Talk
16
10-27-2014 05:58 PM
superduck
Union Talk
420
06-20-2011 10:00 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices