Search

Notices

AA Interviews

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2026 | 09:43 AM
  #131  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 323
Likes: 211
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
I’ve seen more gear down flaps 15 at 6000’ from new hires than senior captains when I was an FO.

But I blame the training department more than them. They get programmed to do that in the sim world in a controlled environment where they are in a position where glidepath at roughly 1 dot to drop the gear and go flaps 15 makes sense. Or discouraged to use or not shown flaps 10 is usually more than enough to hold 170-180 knots while descending down on the path when flaps 5 can’t hold it so they drop the gear and flaps 15 it instead at 5000’.
There is this movement from certain cka that say if you go flaps 3 on the bus you have to put the gear down.
Reply
Old 01-01-2026 | 11:48 AM
  #132  
Not a fed just going home
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 122
Likes: 61
Default

I know guys that have been flying jets for over a decade but based on company circumstances never got to the left seat. Should we keep him out because he worked at companies without movement?

I understand the concern for inexperienced people getting on though. Maybe we find a middle ground. Tougher training, stricter standards for new hires, fly a trip with a ckp before end of probation and shown the door if not up to it?

There's no perfect answer but arbitrarily placing a PIC requirement, college degree, or anything else is imperfect. At least this extends your "interview" to a full year of actually working and we can part ways if you're an idiot, duschebag, or post your paystub on social media.
Reply
Old 01-01-2026 | 06:03 PM
  #133  
Codeshare the pain away
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 311
Likes: 159
From: one DUI away from running the airline
Default

This is a tired old argument. Just like the military vs not.

I’ve seen guys with 0 TPIC and 1501 total time fly an awesome jet, and I’ve seen guys with 10,000 hours 121 PIC do dumb sh!t. I’ve seen guys as a brand new PIC do dumb sh!t and I’ve seen brand new CA/FO save their partner from the mercy of FOQA and ASAP.

There isn’t really a quantifiable requirement you can put on paper that is 100% whether or not someone will be a good pilot or not. What does make or break them though is whether they are trainable, have a good attitude, and you don’t want to stab or report them after a 4 day trip.
Reply
Old 01-01-2026 | 09:02 PM
  #134  
BrazilBusDriver's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 542
Likes: 72
Default

Originally Posted by SkyGodKing
There is this movement from certain cka that say if you go flaps 3 on the bus you have to put the gear down.
Sounds like someone needs to RTFM. How do you teach if you don't know the material?
Reply
Old 01-02-2026 | 03:23 AM
  #135  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 323
Likes: 211
Default

Originally Posted by BrazilBusDriver
Sounds like someone needs to RTFM. How do you teach if you don't know the material?
Cka positions are given of like prizes here.
Reply
Old 01-02-2026 | 04:46 AM
  #136  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 370
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by SkyGodKing
Cka positions are given of like prizes here.
Very true. The 787 Check Pilot cadre has many former management/union officials. Many have never flown the airplane and are made check pilots. Cross your fingers they let you know what you need to know. A while back we had some that had never used HF radios. It is a boys club.

so many are about to retire. It will get worse. What they need to do is implement the new contract provision where the student is trained by the line pilot. Odds are that Pilot will have tons more experience than the pilot that does simulator training and OE. This will also decrease the number of blocked for OE trips. For myself I would consider that job. I have no desire to teach in the simulator. I also refuse to kiss a$$ to get the job.

Reply
Old 01-02-2026 | 08:11 AM
  #137  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 323
Likes: 211
Default

A minimum of 500 PIC hours should be required for any CKA position, with the exception being for new aircraft types. Given the number of 787 captains, it seems reasonable to find qualified CKAs.
Reply
Old 01-02-2026 | 08:16 AM
  #138  
JulesWinfield's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 279
Default

Originally Posted by Varks
Very true. The 787 Check Pilot cadre has many former management/union officials. Many have never flown the airplane and are made check pilots. Cross your fingers they let you know what you need to know. A while back we had some that had never used HF radios. It is a boys club.

so many are about to retire. It will get worse. What they need to do is implement the new contract provision where the student is trained by the line pilot. Odds are that Pilot will have tons more experience than the pilot that does simulator training and OE. This will also decrease the number of blocked for OE trips. For myself I would consider that job. I have no desire to teach in the simulator. I also refuse to kiss a$$ to get the job.
What’s worse than check airman who can’t even hold the airframe, is the fact that they cherry pick the best trips before they hit PBS. Absolutely criminal.
Reply
Old 01-02-2026 | 10:16 AM
  #139  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 323
Likes: 211
Default

Is it true that a specific post-merger hire, who previously held a position of influence and has since left position, is now a 777 Check Airman?

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
What’s worse than check airman who can’t even hold the airframe, is the fact that they cherry pick the best trips before they hit PBS. Absolutely criminal.
It's disgusting a cka who probably couldn't hold a certain trip as an fo is now doing captain IOE on said trip. Absolutely disgusting that apa just sits back and allows it because it also helps their good old boy system.

What's even worse is that there are fewer CKA positions because of the new contract and the FO instructors. Consequently, those with actual expertise are relegated to the less desirable work (sim training), while these new CKAs get the best perks of a job that is in decline.
Reply
Old 01-02-2026 | 10:28 AM
  #140  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 127
Likes: 10
From: B737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
I’ve seen more gear down flaps 15 at 6000’ from new hires than senior captains when I was an FO.

But I blame the training department more than them. They get programmed to do that in the sim world in a controlled environment where they are in a position where glidepath at roughly 1 dot to drop the gear and go flaps 15 makes sense. Or discouraged to use or not shown flaps 10 is usually more than enough to hold 170-180 knots while descending down on the path when flaps 5 can’t hold it so they drop the gear and flaps 15 it instead at 5000’.
i got debriefed on a LC for using flaps 10 because (its not in the AOM profile) lol CKP said gear down/15 is the correct way… So theres that
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Av8tor0773
Regional
8
10-15-2019 01:25 PM
Aviationluver
Career Questions
4
07-12-2017 08:25 PM
MovinUp
JetBlue
126
05-01-2017 06:32 PM
Brand X
Regional
5
09-23-2014 01:56 PM
Slewiair
Major
1
03-04-2007 08:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices