What's old is new; AA de-banking DFW
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 340
American Shifts for Smoother Schedules at DFW
When every hour has a bank of departing flights is an airport really still running with a banked schedule?
DFW operates nine departure banks today, covering departures from 5a to 11p. Starting next spring the carrier will shift to 13 departure banks across the same timeframe.
A traveler today might connect at DFW, arriving in a wave that touches down just after 9a. Assuming everything goes well, they pass in and out of the terminal in under an hour. It is a massive flow of people, and it usually mostly works. But it is not easy, nor is recovery when something goes awry.
The old schedule has a mind-boggling 110 departures scheduled in the 9am hour and a similar number of arrivals. That drops to 52 in the new plan. At the same time, previously underutilized hours (11a, 1p, 3p, 5p, 9p) with fewer than a dozen scheduled departures will now each see more than 40 flights under the new schedule.
[...more...]
When every hour has a bank of departing flights is an airport really still running with a banked schedule?
DFW operates nine departure banks today, covering departures from 5a to 11p. Starting next spring the carrier will shift to 13 departure banks across the same timeframe.
A traveler today might connect at DFW, arriving in a wave that touches down just after 9a. Assuming everything goes well, they pass in and out of the terminal in under an hour. It is a massive flow of people, and it usually mostly works. But it is not easy, nor is recovery when something goes awry.
The old schedule has a mind-boggling 110 departures scheduled in the 9am hour and a similar number of arrivals. That drops to 52 in the new plan. At the same time, previously underutilized hours (11a, 1p, 3p, 5p, 9p) with fewer than a dozen scheduled departures will now each see more than 40 flights under the new schedule.
[...more...]
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 446
Likes: 147
It means more pay, fewer MICs, fewer lost bags. Better for pilots, better for passengers. Costs the company money in the short-term. Finally some investment in the future, it's about time.
#5
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 343
Likes: 26
From: B777 CA
Znotins did this at IAH when he was here. The reliability of the hub shot up and the airport operations team took the credit. It resulted in a lot of lost revenue though and the recovery post Covid resulted in more traditional banks being added as passenger traffic warranted. I guess my point here is the success that will follow this strategy will depend on the metric chosen to highlight. From the pilot perspective, I believe you will see it as a positive.
#6
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 446
Likes: 147
Znotins did this at IAH when he was here. The reliability of the hub shot up and the airport operations team took the credit. It resulted in a lot of lost revenue though and the recovery post Covid resulted in more traditional banks being added as passenger traffic warranted. I guess my point here is the success that will follow this strategy will depend on the metric chosen to highlight. From the pilot perspective, I believe you will see it as a positive.
#7
Thanks for the insight! I agree; stoked to see more moves to make us better, more competitive, more profitable.
#8
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 331
Likes: 2
It worked awesome. When they went back to the banks several years ago, it was borderline dangerous. You could hear the FTW Center controllers getting overwhelmed with vectors and speed changes. It was also a mess on the ground.
Not my monkeys anymore but less bunched up DFW traffic can only help when I fly into there or the adjacent airports.
ETA: It’s not more banks, it’s continuous flow at a manageable rate.
#9
#10
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 446
Likes: 147
In the medium/long term it improves reliability, customer experience, and mishandled bag rate.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



