Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Thoughts from an AA mechanic >

Thoughts from an AA mechanic

Search

Notices

Thoughts from an AA mechanic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2012 | 06:36 AM
  #41  
Csy Mon's Avatar
Retired.
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 7
From: Retired
Default

Not much of a choice here: We will get fornicated up the tailpipe either way but Parker brings more lube to the table with furlough protection, pay increases, better scope and hopefully long term bliss.

As for APA selling out for 30 shekels, BS. APA has done a good job for the members the last 90 days, and with 7K signatures so far, the members are behind APA every step of the way.

Anybody going with Horton and his 1113 has sh!t for brains..
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 06:37 AM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
I appreciate the fact that I'm missed . I do enjoy the discourse that takes place here. My predictions are these:

1. The company will in fact retain the exclusivity period and will present a POR that will be accepted by the majority of creditors.
Possible. But those creditors will have to plan on AA coming out of BK with the pilots at least (and likely the F/A's and FSC's/mechanics) with no labor contracts and operating under a chaotic term sheet environment. VERY unstable business plan for a creditor, if you ask me.

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
2. The APA after attempting to sell out the membership for 30 pieces of silver will return to the table. While they truly have no interest in spending the next 10-15 years in court debating seniority integration issues, they do want to better the deal. I'm all for that if it results in a stronger and more competitive AA!
How long has the current managment sold out ALL the employees (and creditors and shareholders) ?

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
3. Mr. Parker plan is a house of cards built on fake promises that won't stand the test of time. The real danger here is that the APA succeeds in collecting their 30 pieces of silver and the rest of us pay for it a few years remove when the combined identity re-entered BK for the third time.

4. I do believe Mr. Parker alternate POR when presented this fall will be rejected by the majority of the creditors committee. See my "house of cards" comment above.
Well............here we are AGAIN, Tom. I will make my 4TH REQUEST that you explain how and why AMR's business plan for the future is superior to what U might offer. Specifically, what "fake promises" are you referring to and why those fake promises are inferior to can kicking and limping along ?

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
5. The ultimate irony for US will be the merger of AA and B6 thus forever sealing US's status as an also-ran.
Who's been selling YOU this fake promise, Tom ?

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
Eaglefly is correct, neither Mr. Horton or Brundage would spend any time here. But I'm a pilot who's a diehard AAer, and I won't be cowed by the emotional comments posted here.
No one is trying to "cow" you Tom, only highlighting what the OVERWHELMING majority of AA pilots believe. The "No Confidence" petition proves that. The only prediction I'll make here is that if one day the pilots of this airline ever have the right to strike, you'll be the first to cross the picket line. In spirit, you already have.

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
All the "fantasy merger" talk that has consume this forum is laughable. The APA will not be determining the future of AA or any other airline in the near or distant future.
Seems many outside sources don't think it's such a fantasy. In fact, I hear things might be taking place to further it along the street of reality.
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 06:38 AM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
You're right, I don't know what the heck I was thinking. For a second there I could have sworn that AA's rates in either scenario are well above US's. Maybe we all woke up in the twilight zone.
Only focusing on pay rates again. Tsk, Tsk............
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 06:40 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tsuda
Tomahawk brings up an interesting point. If AA does merge with USAir, is a bankruptcy in the newly merged company's future? Not trying to hate, I just don't trust management any more.
Parker would then only place himself (and the new corporation) in the same weak position that AA is currently in. Don't fall for irrational fear tactics by those with another agenda.
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 06:46 AM
  #45  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
I respectfully disagree. I'd be for a merger with DAL, NWA(pre-DAL merger) or UA any day compared to US. Heck, I would have even be open to a US merger prior to the link up with AWA.

But, mergers have never been nor ever will be up to us pilots. APA wants to believe it can determine the future of an airline which is a pure ego and fantasy play that subjects the AA pilot group to untold pain well into the next decade if Mr. Parker has his way.

Interestingly enough, his cutthroat ways of dividing employee groups is given a pass. What's up with that?
APA isn't running any merger, only assisting its occurance and doing so at a time that would be more advantageous to pilots as opposed to current management. The merger will occur anyway, but if under the control of the same management that is doing what it's currently doing, after the disasterous 1113 ramifications, it will then be "groundhog day" and the merger then will offer no job protections and we can add mass furloughs to the list...............and to boot, those who survive will have even worse compensation. Nope, the U merger isn't the best plan for me, but if I have to put my trust and hope in either Parker or Horton, I'll take my chances with Parker and at least SOME chance of avoiding being fed to the wolves (repeatedly).

7000 AA pilots apparently feel the same way.

Last edited by eaglefly; 05-07-2012 at 07:10 AM.
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 06:48 AM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
I'll have to strongly disagree your thought process is way off. You seem to forget the Billions of $ that Parker will bring to this party, billions that a standalone amr won't have access to. Goldman Sachs is already on board, why do you think that is?
I see your clouding the issue with facts again, cacti.
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 06:51 AM
  #47  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
The even sadder development is just how much the APA is being played by Mr Parker all the while thinking they're "in control".

You wake in the morning and realize you threw in you lot with a guy dealing in fool's gold.

The west folks see the dance of the sugar plum fairy and visions of a new tomorrow. The East guys will wonder why they got ganged upon and we poor AAer's....well, we'll deserve it!
I guess that just shows how bad things really are. If the overwhelming majority of the pilots (and in fact ALL unionized labor) are willing to take this chance, the alternative must be truly monsterous. If it is really that bad, is that something the creditors REALLY want to roll the dice with going forward and pass a point that they can't get a "do over" ?
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 07:00 AM
  #48  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hickspilot
aside from all the profanity what specifically is he mad about? i watched the video but i fail to see what he is losing besides a pension. how big of a hit is this?
Yes, after a short period of time he could barely hold a thought long enough to complete a sentence, so it's tough to tell. Seems to me he's just someone who believes he's simply been pushed too far and "lost it". It does go to show how much stress the employees of this airline are under. The recent F/A breakdown was likely another example, at least in part due to the present situation. One has to ask just how far the psychological envelope is being pushed here and if there will be more meltdowns. Additionally, one really has to wonder that if the economic desires that are being demanded be realized, just what foundation remains in the future to re-build what AA has lost (actually given away) ?

Clearly though, the airline has an obligation to have this person evaluated for anger management, alcohol/drug issues and overall state of psychological well-being. Considering his position involves safety and human lives, it would be irresponsible for a company to be aware of this video and not take appropriate action. Godspeed to him.

Last edited by eaglefly; 05-07-2012 at 07:44 AM.
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 07:06 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Enterprise
Why don't you go write a follow up article for Manno's masterpiece. You can tell the world how smart you guys are and how stupid everyone else is. Amazing how everyone else can have it so wrong and not see how sticking with this failed management team and getting raped by their term sheets are "in our best interest".
It's interesting he clings so tightly to it, yet 3 times I've asked him to explain its benefits to us vs. what U might offer and 3 times the crickets chirped loudly. If the answer is that there is no firm information to compare yet, then one would think the only real data you have to evaluate Horton's future plan vs. Parker's is on past performance. Putting the last decade of that back-to-back clearly puts Parker in the "least risk" catagory, if you ask me.

Soon, Parker is likely to reveal his specific plan, but AMR's seems to remain mostly "confidential". What IS known so far hasn't impressed anyone except a specific few, Tomahawk apparently being one.
Reply
Old 05-07-2012 | 10:07 AM
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
DAL and UAL want this AA/US merger to happen more than AA wants it, and Wall Street is on the same page because yes it will help DAL/UAL more than it helps AA. AA/US combo would be nothing more than a convienient(but costly) way of chopping US down to nothing.
They want it because it will help the remaining "big 3" have the pricing power to make money consistently. Horton's plans to substantially cut amr employees pay/benefit will make it harder for ual/dal to compete and as a result stagnate wages/profits. 3 mega carriers will bring stability not seen since before deregulation.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PearlPilot
Your Photos and Videos
12
08-21-2010 09:04 AM
forgot to bid
Hangar Talk
21
04-25-2010 10:21 AM
FXDX
Cargo
3
08-07-2007 07:58 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
14
04-25-2007 09:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices