Search
Notices

What now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2012, 04:37 AM
  #101  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post

Claiming his opinion is correct and seeking more of it is like commending the paper boy's smarts for delivering a paper that has the latest stock market increase and asking his advise on future investing because of it.

What now ?

Well, from what I've heard, the parties will be meeting with judge Lane prior to the 1PM Sept. 4 hearing at his request (perhaps that very morning). WHAT he is going to say to all the parties is not yet known, but it's my understanding that many want a concensual agreement and don't want this apple cart to be tipped over (you rarely get all your apples back when that happens). AMR has refiled their 1113 with "corrections" and is requesting the judge to re-rule on the motion. However, it's my understanding (but I could be wrong) that once an 1113 is denied (regardless of the reasoning), that the 1113 "process" must restart as opposed to being "continued", that being a new 14-21 day expedited process. An expedited process would allow the reintroduction of any new information to compare against the competition to ensure what is demanded is necessary and doesn't produce an unfair competitive advantage and in fact, the APA sent AMR a letter requesting just such information of their latest assessment of all the recent developments both within AMR and their plan, what's occuring at the competition relating to pilot compensation and financial evaluations of their demands in order to ensure what is being demanded is in fact, necessary for successful reorganization and all parties are being treated fairly and equitably.

AMR has requested the court to dismiss any such re-starting of the process and wants an immeadiate ruling using all past testimony and evidence as it being already argued and ruled upon. Desireable, yes, but from what I understand, that is not what the process provides for once an 1113 is rejected. To me, that would seem to imply the debtor is now re-writing bankruptcy law to their advantage. At any rate, I'd expect little likelyhood of any bombshells until Sept. 4, any meetings, the hearing and what judge Lane does.
Eagle,

Your rebuttal shows a good sense of humor and Judges do put pressure on parties to reach a consensual agreement to avoid their having to make a directive ruling. You could very well be right.

Sailing scored a couple of points on an internal debate which has continually simmered over on the Delta property as to the wisdom scope negotiations during our bankruptcy. Some advocated taking a harder line, as American has done. Sailing will point out that thus far American's direction has been less successful than that taken by the Delta MEC.

We will all be watching and hoping this turns out well for the pilots.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 04:43 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,023
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Eagle,


Sailing will point out that thus far American's direction has been less successful than that taken by the Delta MEC.
That really depends on what your definition of success is and for that part, where you sit to "enjoy" that success. My contention would be that 7ER Capt's, FPL guys are a bit happier than anyone hired after 1997 with the scope sale.
boog123 is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 05:16 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by boog123 View Post
That really depends on what your definition of success is and for that part, where you sit to "enjoy" that success. My contention would be that 7ER Capt's, FPL guys are a bit happier than anyone hired after 1997 with the scope sale.
So, when exactly did Bucking Bar and ACL and the majority of Delta pilots on this board get hired? Wasn't that after 2006 when the "scope sale" took place? I don't understand. Why would Delta hire pilots and American have 1,900 pilots on furlough? Didn't we sell our jobs away and American kept their jobs through strong scope? Something doesn't compute here. Explain.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 06:55 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,023
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo View Post
So, when exactly did Bucking Bar and ACL and the majority of Delta pilots on this board get hired? Wasn't that after 2006 when the "scope sale" took place? I don't understand. Why would Delta hire pilots and American have 1,900 pilots on furlough? Didn't we sell our jobs away and American kept their jobs through strong scope? Something doesn't compute here. Explain.
Don't know when anyone was hired. If watching 1000's of mainline jobs go to the regional doesn't compute, then I'd say your computer is F'd up.

I'll go slow for you, AA, NWA and DAL all furloughed/shrank during the downturns, right? Dal and NWA had a few thousand guys retire, thus hiring to replace those jobs. America hasn't hit that wave yet, thus....

Nice try at the deflection though.
boog123 is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 08:01 AM
  #105  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by boog123 View Post
Don't know when anyone was hired. If watching 1000's of mainline jobs go to the regional doesn't compute, then I'd say your computer is F'd up.

I'll go slow for you, AA, NWA and DAL all furloughed/shrank during the downturns, right? Dal and NWA had a few thousand guys retire, thus hiring to replace those jobs. America hasn't hit that wave yet, thus....

Nice try at the deflection though.
What deflection? AMR has 1000 furloughed... DAL has zero. Oh... I see now.. it is the RETIREMENTS... gotcha.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:23 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,023
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
What deflection? AMR has 1000 furloughed... DAL has zero. Oh... I see now.. it is the RETIREMENTS... gotcha.
So you are saying DAL has grown in the last 6 years, needing to hire? Pretty sure we have about 6% less pilots than in 2008. OK, I'll change things up for you and ALFA. Why were any pilots hired by NWA or DAL since, hmmm, 2005? Was it the rapid expansion of flying or retirements?
boog123 is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:02 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,216
Default

. double post

Last edited by Sliceback; 08-30-2012 at 11:04 PM. Reason: double post
Sliceback is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:04 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,216
Default

Originally Posted by boog123 View Post
Don't know when anyone was hired. If watching 1000's of mainline jobs go to the regional doesn't compute, then I'd say your computer is F'd up.

I'll go slow for you, AA, NWA and DAL all furloughed/shrank during the downturns, right? Dal and NWA had a few thousand guys retire, thus hiring to replace those jobs. America hasn't hit that wave yet, thus....

Nice try at the deflection though.

AA's had just under 2600 guys retire in the last 7 yrs.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 05:02 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
What deflection? AMR has 1000 furloughed... DAL has zero. Oh... I see now.. it is the RETIREMENTS... gotcha.
You're banging your head against the wall with this one, T.
slowplay is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 07:24 AM
  #110  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo View Post
So, when exactly did Bucking Bar and ACL and the majority of Delta pilots on this board get hired? Wasn't that after 2006 when the "scope sale" took place? I don't understand. Why would Delta hire pilots and American have 1,900 pilots on furlough? Didn't we sell our jobs away and American kept their jobs through strong scope? Something doesn't compute here. Explain.
Why limit 76 seat jets then? Wouldn't allowing DAL to have unlimited RJ's create more growth at the mainline from the expanded feed?
Mesabah is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices