Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
American and pilots reach tentative pact >

American and pilots reach tentative pact

Search

Notices

American and pilots reach tentative pact

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:27 AM
  #21  
Not A Janitor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GAPILOT36
All the carriers your listing are low cost who aren't big enough to farm out regional flying. Who also do not hop the pond and are NOT legacy carriers.
Hmm, sounds kind of like Hawaiian, too.

United, Alaska and Hawaiian are three legacies that don't outsource 76-seat feed.
Reply
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:37 AM
  #22  
PinnacleFO's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
From: CRJ Captain
Default

Originally Posted by fullflank
This statement is disturbing. Industry standard? Companies who dont outsource 76 seats are:

SWA

AIRTRAN

UNITED

ALASKA

JETBLUE

SPIRIT

VA

What the hell are you basing "industry standard on"? US & Delta, thats all!
With the exception of United, who is about to have 76 seat jets, None of those companies have world wide networks and none of companies fly to places like Duluth, MN or AVP.
I will agree that it would be nice for all flying to be done by mainline, but American would not be any different to the airlines that are similar to it.

You cannot compare Low Cost Carriers to the Legacy airlines. If you don't like the fact that american and united will scope out 76 seat jets, go work for Jet Blue, the option is there for you. Im not bashing all i am saying is that its pretty obvious that american united and delta will be pretty similar going forward, and pay and benefits will be way better than the low cost carriers in the future.
Reply
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:47 AM
  #23  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,125
Likes: 176
Default

Originally Posted by fullflank:1290376
Originally Posted by Mason32
The company wanted 88 seats in the term sheet, and 79 in the TA. 76 is industry standard and a big win considering we're in BK.
go back to Eagle.
This statement is disturbing. Industry standard? Companies who dont outsource 76 seats are:

SWA

AIRTRAN

UNITED

ALASKA

JETBLUE

SPIRIT

VA

What the hell are you basing "industry standard on"? US & Delta, thats all!
With the exception of United who soon will also be at 76 seats, those carriers don't have high yield business passengers in South Bend, Baton Rouge, Augusta, etc that need a quick connection to get on a 777 to London.
Reply
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:52 AM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
The company wanted 88 seats in the term sheet, and 79 in the TA. 76 is industry standard and a big win considering we're in BK.
go back to Eagle.
Pack dirt. Will the pay rates even be close to Delta/United ?

Will codesharing allow them to outsource half our fleet to bigger jets than E175's ?

Did they promise us an Industry Standard contract and not to agree to anything less ?

Believe me, I'd LOVE to wrong, but I'm hearing its lipstick on the pig we rejected.
Reply
Old 11-10-2012 | 08:56 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,507
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
An AA/ US merger would create an exceptional company and a force to be reckoned with. They would be on par with delta and united. Plus, consolidation is good. It forces airfares higher, leading to higher profits, which leads to more pay for us.
You haven't been around this industry very long have you?
Reply
Old 11-10-2012 | 09:30 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

What is UA's limit?
Reply
Old 11-10-2012 | 10:57 AM
  #27  
uaav8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: 737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
What is UA's limit?
On current UA scope WRT #seats...UAL=70 seat RJ's, CAL=50 seat RJ's (larger turboprops allowed at CAL)
Highly likely though that our "top secret Agreement in Principle" might allow 76 seats.
Reply
Old 11-10-2012 | 11:23 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

AA PILOTS! I know it's fun to talk about the smaller jets. Please don't forget the very large code sharing stuff (I know you guys won't as you are the butt kickers among us). We need your strong leadership!

Your friendly neighborhood CAL pilot.
Reply
Old 11-10-2012 | 11:26 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by uaav8r
On current UA scope WRT #seats...UAL=70 seat RJ's, CAL=50 seat RJ's (larger turboprops allowed at CAL)
Highly likely though that our "top secret Agreement in Principle" might allow 76 seats.
And even a higher likelihood of my no vote.
Reply
Old 11-11-2012 | 06:54 AM
  #30  
KillingMeSmalls's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Plus, consolidation is good. It forces airfares higher, leading to higher profits, which leads to more pay for us.
Originally Posted by Grumble
You haven't been around this industry very long have you?
Yeah, that silly texaspilot76. He must not have been around the last time the airline industry deregulated and took 30 years years to consolidate to a profitable environment...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
bgmann
Regional
33
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
FDX aviator
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 11:00 AM
John Pennekamp
Major
31
02-13-2007 01:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices