USAPA Board Approves MOU
#31
One should not have to lose anything for proper representation. Usapa has and continues to fail to represent the west pilots. Lets face facts, it was never designed to. One look at their bylaw and it tells the story. There is ZERO oversight within usapa and they have taken away the ability to roll call, something rich in east history. This is was done for one reason and one reason only, because that roll call majority resides in Phoenix! They have set up an election system with this bogus run off for no other reason than to get a second bite at the apple in the event of voter loss. When that system fails and it DID, they just invalidate the election until they get the results they desire. Usapa is nothing short of criminals that really should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Union fraud here would no be that hard to prove. They have left a wonderful record of such deceit. The distant learning issue where only west pilots were made to pay while the east gets a pass. These are the sorts of things that need to be brought to the attention of the US attorney. Union fraud is a federal crime and several need to be placed in prison.
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
#32
Your on!! We shall know soon enough.. The mechanisms for SLI will most likely be an integral part of this NEW MOU/TA... And this Sir, will be the last nail on the Nic coffin...
#33
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
You forget two leonidas pilots negotiated this? How about the leonidas guys that were at the BPR and voted to send this out?
#34
"Stays in OUR contract"????? What Contract?? The west has their cba and the east has theirs. The SLI was NEVER consummated due to lack of a common CBA. Now WE face a NEW merger, with a whole different set of circumstances. This requires a whole NEW TA...What is the basis for YOUR assumption??
#35
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
"Stays in OUR contract"????? What Contract?? The west has their cba and the east has theirs. The SLI was NEVER consummated due to lack of a common CBA. Now WE face a NEW merger, with a whole different set of circumstances. This requires a whole NEW TA...What is the basis for YOUR assumption??
#36
#38
Really...Last time I checked MY cba it only contained east pilot names and sen. #s. If the Nic is in fact in MY contract, wy are you not bidding east metal??
#39
#40
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
From Silver
4 The primary focus of the parties’ summary judgment filings is whether the Transition
5 Agreement is “binding” on USAPA. According to USAPA, it is “not ‘contractually’ bound
6 by any of ALPA’s agreements,” including the Transition Agreement. (Doc. 160 at 10). But
7 the West Pilots, as well as US Airways, cite a variety of authority supporting the position that
8 the “decertification of ALPA and the certification of USAPA did not change the binding
9 nature of the Transition Agreement.” (Doc. 164 at 7). The West Pilots and US Airways are
10 correct
5 Agreement is “binding” on USAPA. According to USAPA, it is “not ‘contractually’ bound
6 by any of ALPA’s agreements,” including the Transition Agreement. (Doc. 160 at 10). But
7 the West Pilots, as well as US Airways, cite a variety of authority supporting the position that
8 the “decertification of ALPA and the certification of USAPA did not change the binding
9 nature of the Transition Agreement.” (Doc. 164 at 7). The West Pilots and US Airways are
10 correct
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post