Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
USAPA Board Approves MOU >

USAPA Board Approves MOU

Notices

USAPA Board Approves MOU

Old 01-05-2013, 04:06 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew View Post
Speculating now....But perhaps the AOL guys were told to play nice, or find another playground?? The NDA will lift soon, and the FACTS shall surface..
I would think seniority wouldn't be addressed in this MOU/ta besides saying it will follow MB protocols but only after jcba. This is the only logical way to go. The problem here is the east and usapa attempt at harming the west, by pushing the issue down the road it ensures usapa is gone and with it the "problem"
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:11 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

The TA/Nic can be NEGOTIATED modified jointly by the Co./Union. This NEW TA supersedes the previous one. Therefore a NEW process has taken place..
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:14 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
I would think seniority wouldn't be addressed in this MOU/ta besides saying it will follow MB protocols but only after jcba. This is the only logical way to go. The problem here is the east and usapa attempt at harming the west, by pushing the issue down the road it ensures usapa is gone and with it the "problem"
You may be correct. However, following MB protocols seems to imply a NEW process...
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:16 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew View Post
The TA/Nic can be NEGOTIATED modified jointly by the Co./Union.
Well the nic can be modified by the company and usapa bargaining for a new list. Now does this not imply that the nic. Is currently the list in our contract?
This NEW TA supersedes the previous one. Therefore a NEW process has taken place..
That can only be true if the new ta specifically replaces the nic. I very much doubt that.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:17 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew View Post
You may be correct. However, following MB protocols seems to imply a NEW process...
Right, do you remember who forced us to become a single pilot group?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:22 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew View Post
False accusations without proof AKA " Defamation of character/ Slander" can carry a hefty price..Look in to it before you go over the cliff...
Please point to what is false if you can.

Usapa has NOT handled west grievances
Usapa DID overturn a valid election to get the result they wanted when they lost.
Usapa DID negotiate a deal that kept them from paying the DL while west had to pay!

So if you got a suit I suggest you try your absolute best to make it, I would LOVE to be sued by usapa as my counter suit would secure my future. Go ahead make my day.

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:31 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver View Post
Please point to what is false if you can.

Usapa has NOT handled west grievances
Usapa DID overturn a valid election to get the result they wanted when they lost.
Usapa DID negotiate a deal that kept them from paying the DL while west had to pay!

So if you got a suit I suggest you try your absolute best to make it, I would LOVE to be sued by usapa as my counter suit would secure my future. Go ahead make my day.

WD at AWA
My advise to YOU is free of charge. However, legal council may cost you a mint!! Claiming fraudulent activities by YOUR union is a serious charge..Don't pick a fight that you might regret..
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:37 PM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
stamps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Airbus FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 71
Default

We are all dumber for having read this exchange. I award you no points. May god have mercy on your soul
stamps is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:42 PM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by stamps View Post
We are all dumber for having read this exchange. I award you no points. May god have mercy on your soul
It's like a wreck, u can't help but look.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:43 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
Because the TA requires a single contract to use the list.

From Silver
Littleboy is completely clueless. He thinks that usapa and the company can enter into an agreement that disadvantages the smaller group and that is what the court said. This child lives in a world where his expectations have been managed so well that he actually believes what he writes.

The company knows its the quickest route to being sued and its evident in the companies letter to the NMB. I say let him continue along the path of delusion and when reality hits him it will be like being hit with a 2x4 across his crown.

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
texaspilot76
Major
151
10-13-2012 03:13 AM
GW258
Mergers and Acquisitions
270
09-30-2012 07:48 AM
Cactusone
Major
494
04-13-2012 09:43 AM
vagabond
Union Talk
0
12-23-2007 07:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices