Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
USAPA Board Approves MOU >

USAPA Board Approves MOU

Search
Notices

USAPA Board Approves MOU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2013, 01:45 PM
  #81  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut View Post
UPS and Southwest both have independent unions and those pilots are doing very well for themselves.
And yet they aren't completely dysfunctional. Says a lot about the east.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 01:55 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
What would a lawsuit from 3000 east pilots do to the airline? You taught us how. As of today you have a Federal Court judgement FOR the union saying they could change section 22.

I don't think it will matter. Hopefully those in charge will see a way around this mine field.
Very interested in what you think an east law suit would be about. What would the claim be? That you got back and arbitration decision and didnt like it so you will sue?? Really curious on this. Now with all due respect to you and your position you CAN change sec 22 you just cant change something that was awarded by arbitration to something that completely disadvantages the minority is all.

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 02:09 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver View Post
Very interested in what you think an east law suit would be about. What would the claim be? That you got back and arbitration decision and didnt like it so you will sue?? Really curious on this. Now with all due respect to you and your position you CAN change sec 22 you just cant change something that was awarded by arbitration to something that completely disadvantages the minority is all.

WD at AWA
That a new union has the right to renegotiate any section of the contract they inherited.

You are defining DFR, thing is, you won't be the one that gets to do that. A judge will. And it doesn't look like that will be done before a merger with AA.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 02:29 PM
  #84  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
That a new union has the right to renegotiate any section of the contract they inherited.

You are defining DFR, thing is, you won't be the one that gets to do that. A judge will. And it doesn't look like that will be done before a merger with AA.
What union are you going to sue?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 02:55 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
That a new union has the right to renegotiate any section of the contract they inherited.

You are defining DFR, thing is, you won't be the one that gets to do that. A judge will. And it doesn't look like that will be done before a merger with AA.
Ok now i see how the signals are getting crossed. A union has that right but there is a small piece that you are leaving out. That section of the agreement was sent to an arbitrator to decide and that decision was rendered. Now this new union wishes to now try and change what has already been decided and the changes they want are to the grave disadvantage of the other party. The courts really want this to end and the fast way is to give usapa what they want have the company accept then file an injunction to stop it and bring a hybrid against LCC and monetary damages and be done with it.

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 03:04 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

Wiskey,
You said "Hey if the company didn't fear being sued you would have now wouldnt you?" Not exactly sure what you mean but again, I assure you that the company does not fear being sued. The company does not fear ANYTHING that the the pilots can ever threaten- not from you and not from us. (Just look at this report on how our retirement ended up in the PBGC- a common criminal would be more cautious.) These are not normal citizens like you and I. They do not care if what they are doing is morally wrong. They do not care if you are miserable, crazy- bankrupt, divorced, sick, as long as you safely, cheaply fly the plane. They do not live by the same rules and the sooner we realize this the better off we will be- and maybe we can find that "inner peace" that you speak of.
US Airways Pilots First to Investigate PBGC-Trusteed Pension - Forbes
The company is not worried about 1700 disgruntled pilots. What difference does the pesky legal system make when you have deep pockets? We do agree on one thing. It is all about money and y'all ain't got enough of it - neither do we. Basically I agree with this article by Ted Reed.
US Airways Pilots, After Long Wait, Want Payoff From AMR Merger - TheStreet

Sadly, as long as the RLA is in effect, both sides must agree to a negotiated settlement. Our contracts NEVER EXPIRE- they only become amendable. We can all go down kicking and screaming- but the company will run out the clock. Your 1700 pilots and their law suits might be a problem for USAPA but you are no threat to the company. Surely you do realize this.
justjack is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 03:13 PM
  #87  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by justjack View Post
. Your 1700 pilots and their law suits might be a problem for USAPA but you are no threat to the company. Surely you do realize this.
Do you think the 1700 west pilots law suits are a threat to the apa?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 03:19 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

could be- but I doubt that it will work out that way, Cacti. Anybody's guess, which is why there's no point in speculation. We will soon see.
justjack is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 03:20 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

You know I have always said that everybody has a price. No cut to anyone involved. It's just human nature. I think that the East pilots would have moved off of DOH if Parker had offered enough. I think the West would have moved off of the NIC if Parker had offered enough. Money takes the sting out of most things- they have it, we need it. (particularly after years of wandering in the desert) And they all know this.
justjack is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 03:37 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

Cacti, If I were in charge over at the APA, I would make darn sure that ANY merger language would include a way to NEVER, EVER get tangled up in the East/West dispute. Otherwise, no merger. It seems to me that they are well aware of the *******storm this has been USAirways. We have all certainly given them an education as to what they would be in for- just on this site alone. They would be idiots to get involved with this toxic mess.
justjack is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
texaspilot76
Major
151
10-13-2012 03:13 AM
GW258
Mergers and Acquisitions
270
09-30-2012 07:48 AM
Cactusone
Major
494
04-13-2012 09:43 AM
vagabond
Union Talk
0
12-23-2007 07:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices