USAPA coast amendment fails
#22
USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).
APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.
The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).
However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.
This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines
#23
Flies With The Hat On
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Usapa will be gone and control nothing. The Mou you voted on was set up for the apa to takeover:
Mou paragraph 5:
"US Airways, and is successors, if any, shall continue to recognize and treat with USAPA as representatives of the pilots employed by US Airways until another representative for the pilot craft or class is certified by the National Mediation Board (the "NMB")."
Mou paragraph 5:
"US Airways, and is successors, if any, shall continue to recognize and treat with USAPA as representatives of the pilots employed by US Airways until another representative for the pilot craft or class is certified by the National Mediation Board (the "NMB")."
Let's see if I can summarize this.
USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).
APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.
The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).
However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.
This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines

USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).
APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.
The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).
However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.
This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines

#24
Let's see if I can summarize this.
USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).
APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.
The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).
However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.
This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines
#25
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
He told you complete bs. Usapa agreed to have a single union and as usual are going back on their word . This about the east screwing the west, they are terrified the west is given a voice.
PS. A federal judge in az told them they could not participate once we were a single carrier
PS. A federal judge in az told them they could not participate once we were a single carrier
#26
Thread Starter
Meh...
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Nunya
A321,
East and west will be run over roughshod by the APA. The issue for US pilots is the pecking order of our side.
Your point is not lost on any west pilot. As a west pilot, I do not consider the APA to be a white knight, but rather a dark horse.
East and west will be run over roughshod by the APA. The issue for US pilots is the pecking order of our side.
Your point is not lost on any west pilot. As a west pilot, I do not consider the APA to be a white knight, but rather a dark horse.
Let's see if I can summarize this.
USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).
APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.
The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).
However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.
This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines

USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).
APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.
The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).
However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.
This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines

#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Any guesses to what will happen with the new hires after the merger? With AA hiring at the same time how will that factor in? Everyone assumes that the folks hired after the Dec merger close date will be slotted in by DOH but is that a certainty, or is APA looking to staple pretty much everyone on the US side below their own folks?
Any thoughts on if this integration will even go thru at all? They ran the east-west separate for years, closing in on a decade. Heck if this merger hadn't of happened, would they have kept east-west separate forever? Almost seems that way.
Any thoughts on if this integration will even go thru at all? They ran the east-west separate for years, closing in on a decade. Heck if this merger hadn't of happened, would they have kept east-west separate forever? Almost seems that way.
#28
He told you complete bs. Usapa agreed to have a single union and as usual are going back on their word . This about the east screwing the west, they are terrified the west is given a voice.
PS. A federal judge in az told them they could not participate once we were a single carrier
PS. A federal judge in az told them they could not participate once we were a single carrier
I'm new and probably clueless, but that dog don't hunt. What did I miss?
Last edited by stamps; 03-18-2014 at 06:18 PM. Reason: Grammar
#29
Any guesses to what will happen with the new hires after the merger? With AA hiring at the same time how will that factor in? Everyone assumes that the folks hired after the Dec merger close date will be slotted in by DOH but is that a certainty, or is APA looking to staple pretty much everyone on the US side below their own folks?
Any thoughts on if this integration will even go thru at all? They ran the east-west separate for years, closing in on a decade. Heck if this merger hadn't of happened, would they have kept east-west separate forever? Almost seems that way.
Any thoughts on if this integration will even go thru at all? They ran the east-west separate for years, closing in on a decade. Heck if this merger hadn't of happened, would they have kept east-west separate forever? Almost seems that way.
#30
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
So you're saying that the "evil empire" (east/USAPA), who cared so much about protecting their relative seniority that they were willing to decertify ALPA, renig on binding arbitration, and operate as a separate pilot group for a lower hourly rate than west pilots, "agreed to have a single union" (APA) and thereby no substantial influence in the pending seniority integration?
I'm new and probably clueless, but that dog don't hunt. What did I miss?
I'm new and probably clueless, but that dog don't hunt. What did I miss?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



