Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
USAPA coast amendment fails >

USAPA coast amendment fails

Search

Notices

USAPA coast amendment fails

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2014 | 03:47 PM
  #21  
stamps's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Airbus FO / C-17 AC
Default

post deleted

Last edited by stamps; 03-18-2014 at 04:08 PM.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 04:09 PM
  #22  
A321's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stamps
So, for a new hire who isn't interesting in jumping into this p*ssing match but is very interested in the progress of the integration, what's the bottom line?
Let's see if I can summarize this.

USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).

APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.

The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).

However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.

This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.

US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines

Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 04:32 PM
  #23  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Usapa will be gone and control nothing. The Mou you voted on was set up for the apa to takeover:

Mou paragraph 5:
"US Airways, and is successors, if any, shall continue to recognize and treat with USAPA as representatives of the pilots employed by US Airways until another representative for the pilot craft or class is certified by the National Mediation Board (the "NMB")."
This is why USAPA is suing to have a Merger Protocol Agreement that preserves our Merger Committee and it's respective leadership, which will as now be limited to four officers.


Originally Posted by A321
Let's see if I can summarize this.

USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).

APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.

The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).

However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.

This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.

US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines

Correct.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 04:38 PM
  #24  
stamps's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Airbus FO / C-17 AC
Default


Let's see if I can summarize this.

USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).

APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.

The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).

However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.

This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.

US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines

Thanks. Hate to ask such an obvious question, but that was helpful.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 05:09 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stamps
Thanks. Hate to ask such an obvious question, but that was helpful.
He told you complete bs. Usapa agreed to have a single union and as usual are going back on their word . This about the east screwing the west, they are terrified the west is given a voice.
PS. A federal judge in az told them they could not participate once we were a single carrier
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 05:36 PM
  #26  
Thread Starter
Meh...
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Nunya
Default

A321,
East and west will be run over roughshod by the APA. The issue for US pilots is the pecking order of our side.

Your point is not lost on any west pilot. As a west pilot, I do not consider the APA to be a white knight, but rather a dark horse.

Originally Posted by A321
Let's see if I can summarize this.

USAPA and APA agreed to an MOU for the merger before the merger. Part of the MOU said that the two would agree to a "seniority integration protocol" agreement (essentially a document as to how seniority list discussions were going to go IF the merger happened).

APA insisted that they have the ability to unilaterally change language in the MOU after they become the single union (could be this year)... and USAPA didn't like this... it took away the US pilot's ability to adequately oversee seniority integrations.

The MOU also stated that the seniority lists would come together in a "fair and equitable" manner, per McCaskill-Bond legislation (which was written to prevent another TWA/AA staple job).

However, the wolf in sheep's clothing is that the McCaskill-Bond legislation is thrown out the window once the two pilot groups have one union (presumably APA) and the union's internal merger policy supersedes. An internal merger policy can be changed at any time...you can see where this is going.

This is how it has been explained to me. Someone correct me if I am wrong.

US Airways And American And The Elephants In The*Room - Aviation Articles and Commentary - Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines

Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 05:52 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

Any guesses to what will happen with the new hires after the merger? With AA hiring at the same time how will that factor in? Everyone assumes that the folks hired after the Dec merger close date will be slotted in by DOH but is that a certainty, or is APA looking to staple pretty much everyone on the US side below their own folks?

Any thoughts on if this integration will even go thru at all? They ran the east-west separate for years, closing in on a decade. Heck if this merger hadn't of happened, would they have kept east-west separate forever? Almost seems that way.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:17 PM
  #28  
stamps's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Airbus FO / C-17 AC
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
He told you complete bs. Usapa agreed to have a single union and as usual are going back on their word . This about the east screwing the west, they are terrified the west is given a voice.
PS. A federal judge in az told them they could not participate once we were a single carrier
So you're saying that the "evil empire" (east/USAPA), who cared so much about protecting their relative seniority that they were willing to decertify ALPA, renig on binding arbitration, and operate as a separate pilot group for a lower hourly rate than west pilots, "agreed to have a single union" (APA) and thereby no substantial influence in the pending seniority integration?

I'm new and probably clueless, but that dog don't hunt. What did I miss?

Last edited by stamps; 03-18-2014 at 06:18 PM. Reason: Grammar
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 06:57 PM
  #29  
CanoePilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fosters
Any guesses to what will happen with the new hires after the merger? With AA hiring at the same time how will that factor in? Everyone assumes that the folks hired after the Dec merger close date will be slotted in by DOH but is that a certainty, or is APA looking to staple pretty much everyone on the US side below their own folks?

Any thoughts on if this integration will even go thru at all? They ran the east-west separate for years, closing in on a decade. Heck if this merger hadn't of happened, would they have kept east-west separate forever? Almost seems that way.
That's a possibility, the "snapshot date" was never decided on and there are rumors there may not even be a snapshot date.
Reply
Old 03-18-2014 | 10:22 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stamps
So you're saying that the "evil empire" (east/USAPA), who cared so much about protecting their relative seniority that they were willing to decertify ALPA, renig on binding arbitration, and operate as a separate pilot group for a lower hourly rate than west pilots, "agreed to have a single union" (APA) and thereby no substantial influence in the pending seniority integration?

I'm new and probably clueless, but that dog don't hunt. What did I miss?
That dog don't hunt? Maybe you should read the mou and then Silvers findings. The east has done nothing but harm themselves from not freezing their retirement to booting alpa, nothing has changed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
morecowbell
American
250
09-08-2016 03:05 AM
just me
Cargo
9
02-21-2011 09:13 AM
Sandhawk
Major
159
06-30-2009 11:44 AM
cactiboss
Major
87
10-03-2008 02:24 PM
ChickenFlight
Regional
2
09-11-2008 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices