Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Protocol Agreement Reached per USAPA >

Protocol Agreement Reached per USAPA

Search

Notices

Protocol Agreement Reached per USAPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2014 | 11:29 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
If you want to use 2005 then by all means propose it!!
No worries, it will be done. Along with the history of the east pilots and the discriminatory actions of USAPA against the their minority group.

Remember, support a fair and equitable process; support the APA.
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 11:39 AM
  #112  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
No worries, it will be done. Along with the history of the east pilots and the discriminatory actions of USAPA against the their minority group.

Remember, support a fair and equitable process; support the APA.
I think you're close to pulling the string in Purp's back causing him to repeatedly and mindlessly parrot, "Bwaak.....obsession, obsession.......Bwaak' Bwaak".

If you continue much further after that, he then pulls it for you.

Always remember, ANY criticism of USAPA is "obsession".
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 11:46 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
No worries, it will be done. Along with the history of the east pilots and the discriminatory actions of USAPA against the their minority group.

Remember, support a fair and equitable process; support the APA.
The law has been followed so far. We'll just have to see if that trend continues.
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 11:53 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
The law has been followed so far. We'll just have to see if that trend continues.
No worries, it is very likely contract and labor law will be followed going forward- USAPA doesn't have a chance of winning their case in DC court.

On another note, why do you not want a fair and equitable process for all three seniority lists in the MOU?
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 12:17 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
No worries, it is very likely contract and labor law will be followed going forward- USAPA doesn't have a chance of winning their case in DC court.

On another note, why do you not want a fair and equitable process for all three seniority lists in the MOU?
Why do propose something other than the law that was written for SLI?
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 12:37 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
Why do propose something other than the law that was written for SLI?
Please explain, we do not understand you.
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 01:50 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
Please explain, we do not understand you.
Ask Martay, Fergay, and Koontay to explain it to you. Then go with the exact opposite of what they tell you.
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 02:13 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
Ask Martay, Fergay, and Koontay to explain it to you. Then go with the exact opposite of what they tell you.
You're not making any sense.
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 02:29 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
You're not making any sense.
If you don't have a tie they will not explain it to you.

Leonidas, LLC Liberty Necktie Contribution
Reply
Old 05-07-2014 | 02:32 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
The certified bargaining representatives at the time of the merger will continue to participate up to and until one of them is declared the sole bargaining representative at which time they will inherit all duty to fairly represent all sub-segments of pilots (pre-merger groups) interests in the remaining portion of the SLI process.
It's funny, the MOU doesn't say that. If you look on page two, paragraph 5 it says the following:

5. .... until such time as one union is certified by the NMB to be the collective bargaining representative of the combined pilot craft or class. At that time, the duly-certified representative shall have exclusive authority to negotiate on behalf of the pilots with respect to the JCBA.


Why would language be added that said "with respect to the JCBA"? If the APA is certified as new new CBA, (Everyone knows that will happen), then why specify the for the JCBA? If the APA will control absolutely everything, that language would not be necessary. The M/B process will have USAPA representing the US Airways pilots for the SLI. The MOU says the SLI will be in accordance with the M/B process. That looks clear that USAPA will represent US in the SLI. Everything else other than SLI? Well that will fall to the APA. Which does raise the point of where will the dues collected go? Split somehow maybe?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wiskey Driver
American
6
02-28-2014 01:23 PM
newcfii
Regional
16
01-14-2014 07:32 AM
Snarge
United
57
02-12-2013 06:33 AM
cactiboss
Major
198
11-03-2012 01:52 PM
Brocc15
Major
942
05-25-2012 05:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices