Protocol Agreement Reached per USAPA
#111
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: A320
#112
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
If you continue much further after that, he then pulls it for you.

Always remember, ANY criticism of USAPA is "obsession".
#113
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
#114
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: A320
On another note, why do you not want a fair and equitable process for all three seniority lists in the MOU?
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
#119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
#120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
The certified bargaining representatives at the time of the merger will continue to participate up to and until one of them is declared the sole bargaining representative at which time they will inherit all duty to fairly represent all sub-segments of pilots (pre-merger groups) interests in the remaining portion of the SLI process.
5. .... until such time as one union is certified by the NMB to be the collective bargaining representative of the combined pilot craft or class. At that time, the duly-certified representative shall have exclusive authority to negotiate on behalf of the pilots with respect to the JCBA.
Why would language be added that said "with respect to the JCBA"? If the APA is certified as new new CBA, (Everyone knows that will happen), then why specify the for the JCBA? If the APA will control absolutely everything, that language would not be necessary. The M/B process will have USAPA representing the US Airways pilots for the SLI. The MOU says the SLI will be in accordance with the M/B process. That looks clear that USAPA will represent US in the SLI. Everything else other than SLI? Well that will fall to the APA. Which does raise the point of where will the dues collected go? Split somehow maybe?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



