Search
Notices

Nic ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2014, 10:04 PM
  #311  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
Otherwise, using other SLIs, could you possibly see a result that would come out "Nic like"?
i would expect it to come out "Nic. Like" so should you! relative position is how all the last sli's came out.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:09 PM
  #312  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
So your are going to tell the board to ignore that little transition agreement that you guys wanted?

Hey, here's a golden oldie for ya. You remember when you guys thought the MOU completed they TA and you would be bidding with us? That was a good one! Took a lot of ties to pay for that fine legal opinion!

Thanks cacti, you cured my insomnia. Bedtime story:

"Any change in seniority “must rationally
promote the aggregate welfare of employees in the bargaining unit.” Id. This low standard
means that so long as a Court can find some legitimate union purpose motivating a seniority
change, the union has not breached its duty of fair representation."
Yeah, we sure have lost in court a lot lately but don't ignore the reason of why we are losing, "ripeness" in our case as defined by the 9th circuit, the arbitrators will have no such worries.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:11 PM
  #313  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
i would expect it to come out "Nic. Like" so should you! relative position is how all the last sli's came out.
Oh, I thought you meant with us in an order like we were on the Nic, not the Nic type process. That was more slotting by equipment thought. If the panel does that with the staus quo, it will look nothing like the old Nic order.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:11 PM
  #314  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Btw I will reiterate, in my opinion, if the west has a seat the sli there is a better than even chance the usairways pilots will be in Nicolau order.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:11 PM
  #315  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
Yeah, we sure have lost in court a lot lately but don't ignore the reason of why we are losing, "ripeness" in our case as defined by the 9th circuit, the arbitrators will have no such worries.
They won't be worried about ripeness. That's a legal thing.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:13 PM
  #316  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
Btw I will reiterate, in my opinion, if the west has a seat the sli there is a better than even chance the usairways pilots will be in Nicolau order.
I give it less than 10 percent, west committee or not.

Either way, I'll buy the first few rounds on the day after if you're interested.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:14 PM
  #317  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
Oh, I thought you meant with us in an order like we were on the Nic, not the Nic type process. That was more slotting by equipment thought. If the panel does that with the staus quo, it will look nothing like the old Nic order.
Oh sorry misunderstood your point. Yes, I believe the usairways pilots will be in Nic order or close to it in the final sli should the west have a seat. The disparity we have today is artificially caused by usapa and I'm confident the arbitrators will see thru that. Anything less would me an endorsement of east pilot tactics by the arbitrators
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:15 PM
  #318  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Default

BTW, you have any timeline on your appeal? Haven't heard anything about it recently.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:17 PM
  #319  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
They won't be worried about ripeness. That's a legal thing.
Yup........
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:19 PM
  #320  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
BTW, you have any timeline on your appeal? Haven't heard anything about it recently.
Just waiting on 9th to order a hearing. I hear we will drop the case if we get a seat.
cactiboss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TWA4ME
American
44
07-22-2014 06:37 PM
algflyr
American
108
06-25-2014 11:03 AM
Errbus
American
233
01-30-2014 10:44 AM
R57 relay
American
222
01-17-2014 02:17 PM
cactiboss
Major
447
01-09-2012 07:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices