Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Industry Leading without Profit Sharing?? >

Industry Leading without Profit Sharing??

Search
Notices

Industry Leading without Profit Sharing??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2014, 06:20 PM
  #31  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
AA flies 321 transcon's with 106 seats (I think) and it seems to do OK. It certainly won't replace the 757 on SA terrain destinations, that's for sure. I hear it flies like a heavily loaded Cherokee Six with the higher U seating capacities.
Those 106 seaters are in a market by themselves, all biz class seats.
Competing with the UAL PS service..

The 321 doesn't like to go up and then once you get it there it doesn't want to come down.
Thedude is offline  
Old 09-21-2014, 08:20 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,205
Default

Originally Posted by morecowbell View Post
Why only partial? Even if you are a new hire in training, you have the biggest dog in the fight. Or are you at one of the wholly ownes? Coming from one my self a while back, I understand and agree with your thoughts.
However, the wholly owns need to be on the same page. This crap where the company is transferring the Envoy planes to PSA should never happen. What is PSA becoming...the "Mesa" of the wholly-owns?
Well...

There we have it... PSA and PDT will be used to whipsaw with AA. They want "flow", but don't realize that they just screw themselves and mainline also.

Good luck, Envoy is holding the line while others passed it. I would say that Envoy will be shut down in a couple of years.
PilotJ3 is offline  
Old 09-21-2014, 08:25 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dash8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: rabble rouser
Posts: 419
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
Well...

There we have it... PSA and PDT will be used to whipsaw with AA. They want "flow", but don't realize that they just screw themselves and mainline also.

Good luck, Envoy is holding the line while others passed it. I would say that Envoy will be shut down in a couple of years.
we have flow at pdt, not sure how we're screwing mainline when they gave it to us

and envoy is trying to hold the line by trying to strangle us in their last rejected offer to aa
dash8 is offline  
Old 09-22-2014, 01:50 AM
  #34  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: AA
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude View Post
The 321 doesn't like to go up and then once you get it there it doesn't want to come down.
Sounds like Viagra.
Surprise is offline  
Old 09-22-2014, 04:09 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,205
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
Well...

There we have it... PSA and PDT will be used to whipsaw with AA. They want "flow", but don't realize that they just screw themselves and mainline also.

Good luck, Envoy is holding the line while others passed it. I would say that Envoy will be shut down in a couple of years.
we have flow at pdt, not sure how we're screwing mainline when they gave it to us

and envoy is trying to hold the line by trying to strangle us in their last rejected offer to aa
You just don't see it. The savings PDT and PSA are giving to Parker are the ones used against AA.

They will inflate PSA and PDT, people will be stuck in pay 12/4 with the promise of flow.

Envoy flow is about reducing senior payroll while creating savings with the 12/4 cap. PSA and PDT flow is about reducing payroll but at the same time growing the airline with the illusion of career progression.

The flow is a tool for Managment, it haven't worked at envoy in the last 14 years and won't work today.

I don't know what you mean by "trying to strangle us in their last rejected offer to aa". We rejected the Bscale 3 times, while PDT and PSA accept the first offer.

PDT, PSA and Envoy are pawns in the Parker game.
PilotJ3 is offline  
Old 09-22-2014, 08:17 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Saabs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,447
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
You just don't see it. The savings PDT and PSA are giving to Parker are the ones used against AA.

They will inflate PSA and PDT, people will be stuck in pay 12/4 with the promise of flow.

Envoy flow is about reducing senior payroll while creating savings with the 12/4 cap. PSA and PDT flow is about reducing payroll but at the same time growing the airline with the illusion of career progression.

The flow is a tool for Managment, it haven't worked at envoy in the last 14 years and won't work today.

I don't know what you mean by "trying to strangle us in their last rejected offer to aa". We rejected the Bscale 3 times, while PDT and PSA accept the first offer.

PDT, PSA and Envoy are pawns in the Parker game.
Think you rejected a C scale as your already on a B scale, which is what regionals are unfortunately.

Last edited by Saabs; 09-22-2014 at 08:27 AM. Reason: spelling
Saabs is offline  
Old 09-22-2014, 11:21 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,205
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
You just don't see it. The savings PDT and PSA are giving to Parker are the ones used against AA.

They will inflate PSA and PDT, people will be stuck in pay 12/4 with the promise of flow.

Envoy flow is about reducing senior payroll while creating savings with the 12/4 cap. PSA and PDT flow is about reducing payroll but at the same time growing the airline with the illusion of career progression.

The flow is a tool for Managment, it haven't worked at envoy in the last 14 years and won't work today.

I don't know what you mean by "trying to strangle us in their last rejected offer to aa". We rejected the Bscale 3 times, while PDT and PSA accept the first offer.

PDT, PSA and Envoy are pawns in the Parker game.
Think you rejected a C scale as your already on a B scale, which is what regionals are unfortunately.
True, can't argue.
PilotJ3 is offline  
Old 09-22-2014, 12:35 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude View Post
Those 106 seaters are in a market by themselves, all biz class seats.
Competing with the UAL PS service..

The 321 doesn't like to go up and then once you get it there it doesn't want to come down.
AA's are Biz/Coach Plus/and coach.
7576FO
7576FO is offline  
Old 09-22-2014, 01:38 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
Well...

There we have it... PSA and PDT will be used to whipsaw with AA. They want "flow", but don't realize that they just screw themselves and mainline also.

Good luck, Envoy is holding the line while others passed it. I would say that Envoy will be shut down in a couple of years.


I think you are exactly right. I for one do not blame them for doing what is best for them right now, but ultimately there will be consequences that will affect them. If flow through is the main motivation it will be meaningless as more mainline flying is replaced.
Secondly, I think eventually we will see an erosion of scope from all the majors in exchange for higher pay. Again, short term thinking from those in their last decade or so who see the direction of airline flying, larger regional jets and proportionately larger mainline jets but less upward movement for both.
TRZ06 is offline  
Old 09-22-2014, 03:58 PM
  #40  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: AA
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by TRZ06 View Post
Secondly, I think eventually we will see an erosion of scope from all the majors in exchange for higher pay. Again, short term thinking from those in their last decade or so who see the direction of airline flying, larger regional jets and proportionately larger mainline jets but less upward movement for both.
I'd like to think there won't be any more scope sales. The current union leadership claims that it's non-negotiable, so they seem to understand. And the next decade will see many new mainline pilots who were negatively affected by the regional airline C-scale (B-scale seems a little generous). Of course, pilots have been known to suffer from myopia when a little money is dangled in front of them, so we'll see.

As for profit sharing, that's not a deal-breaker for me. It is theoretically possible to have industry leading pay without it. However, I would like to see some assurance that every pilot's bottom line W2 compensation is in line with his or her respective peer at United or Delta. If the company wants to contractually lock themselves in to paying at a level which would still meet or exceed what the other guys make, including their profit sharing, well then fine. But I think to do that would require a lot of complicated legal triggers to make sure it happens, or just a really high base rate.

I think it's probably easier for everyone if we have a system comparable to Delta's. Lots of money guaranteed, and if, God forbid, the company does well then we can share in that, too.

And no scope sales.
Surprise is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coto Pilot
United
0
06-19-2013 12:21 PM
Coach67
United
43
03-12-2012 08:16 PM
GreenArc
United
13
01-11-2012 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices