Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Industry Leading without Profit Sharing?? >

Industry Leading without Profit Sharing??

Search

Notices

Industry Leading without Profit Sharing??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2014 | 02:56 PM
  #51  
Hueypilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: B737
Default

I don't think that our management is just "giving away money" just for the heck of it. I think they are trying to sew up all the labor contracts so they can get on with the business of finishing the merger. If we're still two airlines floundering around trying to figure out contracts and other stuff, we can't possibly get organized well enough to compete with DAL and the others.

I've heard from a few others that Parker and Kirby are keen on wrapping up the JCBA stuff pretty quick...if so, that's smart. Spend a little more now so they can turn AA into a thoroughbred competitor. I think the issue about scope was being bounced around by Kirby just to see what the reception would be...maybe the pilots would be receptive? I think once we answer with a resounding "NO", they'll try to wrap up the contract and give us pay similar to Delta.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 04:01 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by Piklepausepull
And we will put the same in our new contract......

Imagine the possibilities!!!!!!!!

How high can we go.......................................
Not high at all if every pilot group negotiates the same deal.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 07:54 AM
  #53  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
Is anyone else concerned that Parker & Co are giving away money left and right? It's a complete departure from past times. With SWA, JetBlue, Spirit, and Frontier gearing up in various markets of ours, plus managements idea to burn a cool billion in stock buybacks, I'm worried we'll be the next United.

I don't mean to sound so negative, but our competitors are increasing ASM's while increasing loads while we are flat and declining.
He's not giving away money. He's investing it in his employees.... Do you think you can have a good product with completely unmotivated employees?
Doesn't it demotivate you to know you are making up to 30% less than your competitors for doing the same job? No profit sharing, etc?
There are costs in merging companies, but in the end hopefully the product will be worth more than the parts.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 10:20 AM
  #54  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: A320 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
He's not giving away money. He's investing it in his employees.... Do you think you can have a good product with completely unmotivated employees?
Doesn't it demotivate you to know you are making up to 30% less than your competitors for doing the same job? No profit sharing, etc?
There are costs in merging companies, but in the end hopefully the product will be worth more than the parts.
Actually, no not really. Money has always been a poor motivator when you're talking big picture stuff.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't anticipating that 2016 raise, but I worked just as hard and cared just as much for the operation when I was a commuter F/O. I'd bet a lot of us could say that.
Reply
Old 09-26-2014 | 12:50 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
Actually, no not really. Money has always been a poor motivator when you're talking big picture stuff.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't anticipating that 2016 raise, but I worked just as hard and cared just as much for the operation when I was a commuter F/O. I'd bet a lot of us could say that.
Well inline,
If a more than 50% can say that, then stand by for a pay cut, cause if the SAME job can get done at the SAME level for half the pay, then really what right does mgmt have agreeing to spend the extra 50% on your services.

If you work just as hard and care just as much for 1/2 the pay, why give you any raise at all?

Many things motivate employees, but $$$$$ has got to be 2 out of the top three.
LUV
Reply
Old 09-27-2014 | 06:23 AM
  #56  
Bad-Andy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Recalled....
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
Actually, no not really. Money has always been a poor motivator when you're talking big picture stuff.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't anticipating that 2016 raise, but I worked just as hard and cared just as much for the operation when I was a commuter F/O. I'd bet a lot of us could say that.
Not sure where you get that statement, but it simply is not true. While money, in and of itself, may not be a great motivator, it is a direct indication of one the most powerful motivator -- equity. Study after study shows that a sense of fairness or equity (paying me what I'm worth, in comparison to job skills and to my counterparts) is a workplace motivator.

To say that you worked equally as hard or cared for the operation as a commuter F/O is either untrue (you are deluding yourself) or you are an anomaly (which is entirely possible, in which case, I admire your work ethic). Study after study shows that pay equity directly affects motivation which directly impacts operational efficiency. These are not correlations, they are cause-and-effect relationships.

But don't take my word for it, do a search on Google Scholar (select peer-reviewed papers only to avoid the unchecked lunacy that some people write) and read some of the scientific papers on workplace motivation, pay, and equity. Here is a link to a few of the papers about money, motivation, and the airline industry: money motivation airline - Google Scholar.

In heavily unionized industries, money is THE motivator for most people. Want proof? Look at how many people turn straight to the compensation system when we get a T/A and vote accordingly...
Reply
Old 09-27-2014 | 03:16 PM
  #57  
PRS Guitars's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 4
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
Actually, no not really. Money has always been a poor motivator when you're talking big picture stuff.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't anticipating that 2016 raise, but I worked just as hard and cared just as much for the operation when I was a commuter F/O. I'd bet a lot of us could say that.
Money matters. Not in how good of a job I do, but definitely in terms of how much I work. For example, on first year pay, I'm not ever trying to pick up extra trips. It's just not worth it at $40 per hour. Similarly, if I am ever fortunate enough to make $250k or more a year, I'm not going to pick up extra trips when The government is taking 40 cents on the dollar or whatever the government is taking from me at that time (probably over 50 by then). Rather, I'll fly as little as possible and focus on QOL. In between those two stages of life, I'll work my butt off.
Reply
Old 09-28-2014 | 04:35 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: 767 capt
Default

Scot Kirby in DFW said that the company is willing to offer meaningfully more economic value then the MOU calls for and do it quicker. More days off? More money? We will see. and give up what? Scope. be careful!
Reply
Old 09-28-2014 | 06:06 AM
  #59  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Did Scot actually say Scope, or are you just guessing that's what he wants?
Reply
Old 09-28-2014 | 06:19 AM
  #60  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: 767 capt
Default

No he didn't say scope. I just hope we don't fall into that trap!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coto Pilot
United
0
06-19-2013 12:21 PM
Coach67
United
43
03-12-2012 08:16 PM
GreenArc
United
19
01-11-2012 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices