Industry Leading without Profit Sharing??
#81
#82
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Whoa Whoa whoa guys, ya gotta understand how things work around here. You see, it's the AA way and there really isn't a better way to do things but the way the have been doing it for years. They know best..........
Yes I gag more and more at the things I see coming down towards us. And I thought we had a ****ty deal
Yes I gag more and more at the things I see coming down towards us. And I thought we had a ****ty deal
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Looking at the latest info from the company. Scot Kirby said they have asked for 81 seat scope. So I guess that makes it official and not rumor. He said that more regional flying = more mainline flying. He said they want to add 5 seats to the current 76 seaters and the ones they have on order. No additional aircraft though. He said ORD and CLT are examples of hubs that would not exist with out RJ's.
#84
There is no free lunch on this, LTD costs money and has to be accounted for by a reduction elsewhere in the contract.
#85
I agree. If I lose my medical, I'll spend some time trying to see if I can get it back but at some point I'd move on. I got my masters degree in adult education specifically so I could teach in a simulator program as a "Plan B".
#87
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Some thread drift...and I'll probably get massive amounts of flak for this, but if one is capable working after four years, they probably ought to start working again in a different area. I couldn't see myself collecting disability indefinitely, for an issue that prevents me from flying, but doesn't prevent me from working. I wouldn't be able to look myself in the mirror; I want to be a producer. Again, I'm talking about an otherwise fully able bodied person here.
There is no free lunch on this, LTD costs money and has to be accounted for by a reduction elsewhere in the contract.
There is no free lunch on this, LTD costs money and has to be accounted for by a reduction elsewhere in the contract.
I'm not advocating being a deadbeat or parasite, but this was previously a negotiated benefit that most never needed, but those who did, REALLY did. Considering most mainline pilots pensions have been essentially wiped out to the tune of between 60-80% and then in their mid or later 50's they find themselves in the 4 year LTD window with medical (and/or other) expenses eating most of that up and then 4 years later little or nothing left for assistance, it's a sobering position to recover from that. Finding another $150-200,000/year job isn't as easy as it sounds. I'm sure those younger either think this situation couldn't happen to them or they'd certainly be able to recover financially to pre-career financial footing, but ask someone needing it now 20 years older and I'm sure you'll get a different perspective.
Again, I certainly hope you don't experience this hideously diluted benefit, but if the company believes that after 4 years you can hold a mop at McDonalds or sit in a chair at a Walmart entrance and smile, you're good to be kicked to the curb. Every AA pilot should be saving 25% of their income unless they have a sure-fire dead-bang back-up that pays as well as what they lost. Depending on the medical issue itself, they may not be possible even if you do and everyone knows most employers will avoid saddling themselves with a 50-something worker with significant health problems.
Personally, I think you should reevaluate just how critical this lost benefit really was.
#89
So apparently I misunderstood how LTD works.. I thought it was good until age 65 unless furloughed for up to 60% of your salary with a max benefit of $8000/month. Offset after 48 months by earned income, social security or workers comp. if unable to work after 48 months, you would still receive the benefit minus offsets from social security. This isnt correct?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




