Search

Notices

AA Reserve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2015 | 05:47 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: fo
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
And yet again the APA went for pay rates and nothing more.

Aren't the AA guys tired of this crap?

At this point I'd rather vote no, and shore up all the holes in the contract come 2018/2019. Forget the large raise, I'd be much happier with parity and a real contract, not the POS commuter Green Book.
The problem with this theory is that is what should have occurred here with the jcba. No pay raise but get some key improvements to the bancruptcy green book contract addressing rsv, guaranteed days off for block holders, min calendar day, 321 pay, ltd, life insurance etc....

The problem with voting no is we still don't get any of this now and without the pay, it is just that much more you have to negotiate for in 2020. If you think APA will be ok with being 30% behind UAL and delta at that point your naive, we will just come full circle to where we are now. If the economy isn't as strong as it is now we get nothing again.

I'm just not optimistic of getting this major contract with pay and every other item in 5 years as I don't think the world economy will allow it.
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 05:49 AM
  #22  
KiloAlpha's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 0
From: AA A320
Default

Sounds aweful. I wonder how long it will take for L-US pilots to be working under the AA "rules". I used quotes because it sounds like the first rule of AA reserve club is there are no rules.
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 06:11 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Default

There are plenty of rules, 2 8 X 10 glossy color graphs, a 4 page flow chart and a 64 page Reserve User Guide

And that's just the stuff that the pilots standing reserve are given

Scheduling has a whole 'nother book of past practice and procedures that they use, and you can't see




Even with all that suck... I still only fly 20-30 hrs per month

Folks who want the $$ can usually break guarantee, and often max out
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 06:33 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 341
Default

Originally Posted by psw757
The problem with this theory is that is what should have occurred here with the jcba. No pay raise but get some key improvements to the bancruptcy green book contract addressing rsv, guaranteed days off for block holders, min calendar day, 321 pay, ltd, life insurance etc....

The problem with voting no is we still don't get any of this now and without the pay, it is just that much more you have to negotiate for in 2020. If you think APA will be ok with being 30% behind UAL and delta at that point your naive, we will just come full circle to where we are now. If the economy isn't as strong as it is now we get nothing again.

I'm just not optimistic of getting this major contract with pay and every other item in 5 years as I don't think the world economy will allow it.

I agree with your stance, by 2019 both DAL and UAL would've had new contracts which would well eclipse ours after the pay parity. We're essentially getting pay parity on a 5/6 year old contracts.

To even come close to their rates at that point we're going to have to sell a whole heck of a lot. Probably scope included. With the hard-on 2/3 of our group has for pay rates anything else just won't matter.
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 06:40 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: fo
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
I agree with your stance, by 2019 both DAL and UAL would've had new contracts which would well eclipse ours after the pay parity. We're essentially getting pay parity on a 5/6 year old contracts.

To even come close to their rates at that point we're going to have to sell a whole heck of a lot. Probably scope included. With the hard-on 2/3 of our group has for pay rates anything else just won't matter.
I just view it as the best path to correcting the contract. If we take the pay now we will be within a couple % of delta in 2019/2020 and we can really focus on the work rules rather than having to improve the whole contract again.

Scope is the last real leverage that I think we have going into 2019/20 whether we vote yes or no. It may not even be worth that much by then either depending on what happens with the regionals and if mainline takes back that flying.
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 06:59 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Default

The JCBA was never the vehicle for fixing all of that. It was defined by the MOU and limited by the conditions of the arbitration.

Voting No in 2012 got us the 1113 Term Sheet

It was the operation disintegrating that brought about LBFO2 and the 2012 CBA, then CLA, then MOU, then MTA, now JCBA

Voting No gets us arb, and Best Case, the MTA, possibly early openers in 2017( unless the AAG Board decides to "give" is the "deal" again...) and a Section 6 process constrained by the RLA and beginning with 2-3 years of talks about Parking and Passports before they even begin to discuss TheBigTicketItems.

There is a path to better, but it is not "Just Say No"

JMO, of course, validated by history
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 07:14 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
And yet again the APA went for pay rates and nothing more.

Aren't the AA guys tired of this crap?

At this point I'd rather vote no, and shore up all the holes in the contract come 2018/2019. Forget the large raise, I'd be much happier with parity and a real contract, not the POS commuter Green Book.
'

The definition of insanity.. Doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different result.

Also known as... Keep voting YES to management's first offer, while expecting Management to "do the right thing" because they respect you. Insanity.
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 07:47 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Default

I actually feel really bad for you legacy airways guys. You have no idea what you're getting into. Prolonged reserve at most airlines cause divorces, at AA it lead to suicides.

The "green book" is a gutter trash of a contract that rivals the ****tiest regionals. There is NO QOL at AA unless you're top 20% in status. What's mind boggling is that some (maybe even most, we'll find out on the 30th) are willing to trade the only leverage that we have, for not even an industry standard compensation package, instead of QOL items.

I actually don't even want to get into listing all the deficits in the contract because it's just too time consuming.
East and west guys, you're in for a shock and awe.
Welcome to hell
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 08:07 AM
  #29  
KiloAlpha's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 0
From: AA A320
Default

Why has the company implemented the 12/13 day off provision for L-US reserves, but has not implemented the requirement to check with scheduling after an assignment ends?
Reply
Old 01-16-2015 | 08:10 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
Why has the company implemented the 12/13 day off provision for L-US reserves, but has not implemented the requirement to check with scheduling after an assignment ends?
Because it doesn't exist.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dragon
Major
151
06-07-2012 03:21 PM
757Driver
Major
26
08-09-2011 05:50 AM
ryan1234
Money Talk
6
09-27-2008 07:31 AM
Riddler
Major
26
01-07-2008 03:43 PM
Hornetguy
Fractional
2
02-26-2007 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices