USAPA Withdraws
#71
WD at AWA
#73
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
#75
#76
WD at AWA
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
I seriously doubt it. I imagine that they figure if they have to start with the Nic then they need to be more aggressive because so many west guys don't bring to this merger the seats that their name is beside.
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
I agree you DID when there was a question of 3 lists but that is no longer the case. There are but 2 lists and usapa has decided to not to attend in a showing of not supporting and or honoring the arbitration result. Its of no real issue as the SLI will continue and the east is represented within the the NIC award.
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
If there is no east committee our DFR and MB rights will have been breached. Period.
The first lawyer for a DFR is being consulted on Monday.
#80
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Highly doubtful. Their proposal (the LAA committee and not APA) was based on fundementals and if anything IF only one competing model (which includes the Nic) is presented in opposition, that impacts their fundementals differently. I can only wonder if aside from a different feathering methodolgy model is selected (whether further refined or modified) that fences aren't more prevelent. From what I heard, the APA had perhaps 6-10 "models" based on various counter-positions by the other two parties. If only a Nic based competing model is now in play for the arbitrators to consider, it may require a different competing model to ensure the interests of LAA pilots are represented properly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



