Junior LUS pilots beware
08-07-2015, 06:08 AM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,448
Originally Posted by Sliceback
How do you get a median total time that has a range of 4,000 hrs(6,000 to 10,000)?
Aren't 87% of all statistics false? And the other 32% are made up?
Aren't 87% of all statistics false? And the other 32% are made up?
I don't know why people get worked up over this crap, who cares.
08-07-2015, 06:21 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: DFW A320 FO
Posts: 586
Relax. Sounds like a lone wolf (truth be told he's probably part of a very small pack) who's been fed that he's the best of the best that is having a tough time coming to grips with a seniority based world and being at the bottom. He'll figure it out eventually.
No effort will be put into placating him.
No effort will be put into placating him.
08-07-2015, 06:59 AM
#34
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by Hueypilot
EF, you of all people shouldn't be pointing fingers at others getting upset over inaccurate descriptions of their particular employee group. APF is chock full of EF novels tackling the ever-maligned Eagle flows...
Originally Posted by Hueypilot
FWIW his numbers are way off. We had 25 in my class. 27 was probably the youngest. I was 40 and was #11 out of 25 in age. Everyone had turbine PIC. The military guys had the lowest total time but even we came through the door with well over 3,000 hours and plenty of PIC and IP time.
08-07-2015, 07:01 AM
#35
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by Saabs
I see what you did there
I don't know why people get worked up over this crap, who cares.
I don't know why people get worked up over this crap, who cares.
08-07-2015, 07:06 AM
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 2,183
Originally Posted by eaglefly
I never get "upset" about what others claim about flows. I do however participate in providing another POV. Those embroiled in emotion obviously cannot diffetentiate the two tacks.
You, you're providing a service.
08-07-2015, 07:53 AM
#37
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by EMBFlyer
Ah, I see now. When others get upset about the SLI and how they're perceived as being treated poorly, they're just "emotional".
You, you're providing a service.
You, you're providing a service.
His "letter" has no real obtainable goal or point and is merely venting. I can see why it WOULD generate an emotional response as it was inflammatory though. That being the case, some will read it and move on in disregard and others will feel compelled to respond even escalating an essentially pointless exercise.
Hey, you're free to be the person you are, but IMO, too many pilots are too emotional and that's not a good trait. Another example is the reaction..........actually OVERreaction to the AAPSIC's use of "superior" in describing pre-merger AA vs. pre-merger US and not that of individual or collective pilot worth.
As long as so many of us let emotion alter our actions which is the foundation of division, management will play us like the chumps we are now and forever. But, by all means continue on.........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
