Search

Notices

Occupational date

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2015 | 05:15 PM
  #51  
Hueypilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: B737
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Just a thought, but shouldn't the proposals in play dictate the potential methodology considerations for your segment of pilots, especially that by your own committee? To wit, when does your longevity component start.......when you could have attended new-hire indoc or when you did attend new-hire indoc ?

On the LAA side, a thousand furloughees chose to exercise their contractual right to defer recall because they could and in their understanding, it too didn't matter. The AE flows weren't even given a choice of attending their assigned indoc class, others decided that for them for their benefit, not the flows.
This has been touched upon by others commenting recently. At LUS, they hired you into an indoc class. There was no pool. It was possible to defer, but that was something someone had to work out when called.

Once at indoc, seniority started on that day (as did your pay anniversary), and seniority within the class was further defined by age. The older, the more senior.

On day one, they passed out a sheet that had base assignments and class dates. Since seniority was already established, the class date one chose didn't matter. In fact, it was fairly common that all things being equal, the more senior guys in the class often chose the later class dates, since pay was guaranteed at 85 hours in training and that often gave people 1-2 weeks off in between indoc and the start of ground school with pay.

Fast-forward two years, and now APA is hinting that they would like to apply the OCC (LAA) model of determining seniority retroactively to all pilots hired after the POR (i.e., after December 9, 2013). So the guys who were hired at LUS and wound up being more senior in their class (like myself), who exercised that seniority to pick a base and/or class date that gave them time off or gave them a base they wanted, will now be penalized...all due to a contract that didn't exist at the time.

I can see how there's some legal authority to do that to people hired after the JCBA (and it still sucks), but I don't see how that's legal to retroactively apply that standard to a group of people that had absolutely zero expectation of said process being applied to them...in fact, during indoc, the training department stated that new hire seniority dates would likely be adjusted to DOH for everyone, rather than the archaic and overly complicated OCC system.
Reply
Old 12-18-2015 | 02:18 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hueypilot
This has been touched upon by others commenting recently. At LUS, they hired you into an indoc class. There was no pool. It was possible to defer, but that was something someone had to work out when called.

Once at indoc, seniority started on that day (as did your pay anniversary), and seniority within the class was further defined by age. The older, the more senior.

On day one, they passed out a sheet that had base assignments and class dates. Since seniority was already established, the class date one chose didn't matter. In fact, it was fairly common that all things being equal, the more senior guys in the class often chose the later class dates, since pay was guaranteed at 85 hours in training and that often gave people 1-2 weeks off in between indoc and the start of ground school with pay.

Fast-forward two years, and now APA is hinting that they would like to apply the OCC (LAA) model of determining seniority retroactively to all pilots hired after the POR (i.e., after December 9, 2013). So the guys who were hired at LUS and wound up being more senior in their class (like myself), who exercised that seniority to pick a base and/or class date that gave them time off or gave them a base they wanted, will now be penalized...all due to a contract that didn't exist at the time.

I can see how there's some legal authority to do that to people hired after the JCBA (and it still sucks), but I don't see how that's legal to retroactively apply that standard to a group of people that had absolutely zero expectation of said process being applied to them...in fact, during indoc, the training department stated that new hire seniority dates would likely be adjusted to DOH for everyone, rather than the archaic and overly complicated OCC system.



This would be the way to do it!

Would benefit everyone on the LAA side as well. (Plus, we were told to expect this method once things were ironed out.)

I never would have imagined some crazy retroactive JCBA garbage-not in a million years.
Reply
Old 12-18-2015 | 05:39 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: DFW A320 FO
Default

Before everyone gets too wound up, all this is in the JCBA and it should be no surprise it's going this way. But....

Pay is based on "classification date" not "occupational date". OD is seniority on the pilot's list and CD is for pay. Typically they're the same for LAA but they could adjust OD for LUS (or LAA ftm) to order the list without screwing with CD (as they should) and therefore pay steps.

One thing is for certain though, DOH would sure as hell be more simple moving forward and few will ever understand "why?".
Reply
Old 12-18-2015 | 10:15 AM
  #54  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 210
Likes: 1
From: 737
Default

The classification date is bogus.
Read the email from APA from yesterday you turkeys.
Don't get me started on the LAX guy either, but apparently LUS is going away
Reply
Old 12-20-2015 | 06:12 PM
  #55  
Hueypilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: B737
Default

DOH would be eons simpler. It's almost as if LAA goes out of its way to find the most complex solution.
Reply
Old 12-21-2015 | 05:21 AM
  #56  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 210
Likes: 1
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Hueypilot
DOH would be eons simpler. It's almost as if LAA goes out of its way to find the most complex solution.
Not true. You need to understand more about seniority list integration and the inner folds of the working.
Reply
Old 12-26-2015 | 07:33 PM
  #57  
New Hire
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

I was part of the 21Jul15 indoc class at DFW, we had the distinction of being the first class to have all of the LUS training done at DFW (we also had a 64 year, 11 month old Envoy flowthrough but that's a different story).

On day 2 or 3 we split off from our LAA brothers and sisters to a different room and the 12 of us "chose" our 190 training dates. We asked the folks present, the MD80/190 Fleet Manager (LUS pilot) and the training guy (former PHX training guy), what the New American uses for seniority and they said 21JUL, our DOH. The youngest guy in the class got the class that started four days after indoc and the senior folks sat at home for up to 8 weeks. Hahaha.

Obviously, we were under the JCBA, and I guess I should have read it cover to cover by day 3 but I hadn't. I'm more worried that the training people and fleet manager didn't know the correct answer as of Jul15. I didn't even know this was an issue until the email a few weeks ago. That being said, I'm happy to be here and I'm sure this will be just the first issue over a long career.
Reply
Old 01-04-2016 | 11:28 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry
I agree with this sentiment as well.

Unfortunately, looks like the union is trying to hose the LUS guys.

I would be pleased as punch if they would make the OCC date the same as the hire date for everyone-that would be fair and would benefit everyone as far as pay goes.

Maybe that is what they intend. I just got an altogether different message from that email.

And that's exactly what we were told was happening on the LAA side while we were in indoc. on the LUS side!
Reply
Old 01-04-2016 | 11:29 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry
[/B]

This would be the way to do it!

Would benefit everyone on the LAA side as well. (Plus, we were told to expect this method once things were ironed out.)

I never would have imagined some crazy retroactive JCBA garbage-not in a million years.

This is the first union I've ever paid to attack me. Good times.
Reply
Old 01-04-2016 | 12:05 PM
  #60  
Child of the Magenta
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by iamhungus
I was part of the 21Jul15 indoc class (we also had a 64 year, 11 month old Envoy flowthrough but that's a different story).
What? Why in the world would they allow someone within 1 month of retirement to flow to American. Also, the better question is, why in the world would he want to? Indoc isn't exactly a vacation.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ShyGuy
Regional
412
06-05-2011 02:16 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
jet320
Hiring News
4
06-12-2008 07:12 AM
jet320
Foreign
4
05-27-2008 01:38 PM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
2
01-01-2006 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices