SO - Where's the SLI?
06-21-2016, 04:16 PM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Originally Posted by AAFlagship
So much for honoring the confidentiality agreement........
From beginning to end the whole arbitration process is to stew the frogs slowly and incrementally.
The confidential comment period is for leaks. It's part of the process.
06-21-2016, 04:56 PM
#32
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by AAFlagship
So much for honoring the confidentiality agreement........
The legacy of the AAPSIC's whack revisal may just be its purpose (and possible success) of demonstrating just how the Nicolau upsets the ability to craft the most fair and equitable list given the complex pre-merger realities present in this SLI. If any model should bear even a close resemblance to the final product, my bet would be on the AAPSIC's original proposal with of course, the obvious disagreement noted here.
06-21-2016, 04:58 PM
#33
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
From beginning to end the whole arbitration process is to stew the frogs slowly and incrementally.
The confidential comment period is for leaks. It's part of the process.
The confidential comment period is for leaks. It's part of the process.
06-21-2016, 05:01 PM
#34
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 40
Originally Posted by eaglefly
If true, it shouldn't surprise anyone. As Nicolau so aptly stated, the various proposals rarely meet the fair and equitable standard. Since AAPSIC's revised proposal was "whack" and most certainly the East's was nuts and of course the West's was Kookoo for Cocoa Puffs, I still stand by my original belief that the Nic will not be used in pure form (although segments of it may be apparent) and none of the three models will be adopted.
The legacy of the AAPSIC's whack revisal may just be its purpose (and possible success) of demonstrating just how the Nicolau upsets the ability to craft the most fair and equitable list given the complex pre-merger realities present in this SLI. If any model should bear even a close resemblance to the final product, my bet would be on the AAPSIC's original proposal with of course, the obvious disagreement noted here.
The legacy of the AAPSIC's whack revisal may just be its purpose (and possible success) of demonstrating just how the Nicolau upsets the ability to craft the most fair and equitable list given the complex pre-merger realities present in this SLI. If any model should bear even a close resemblance to the final product, my bet would be on the AAPSIC's original proposal with of course, the obvious disagreement noted here.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
