Search

Notices

PHX and LAX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2016 | 06:03 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by LIOG41
CLT will probably shrink if PHX shrinks...both have the same future if "shrinkage" is allowed. I don't think either will shrink, in fact it's quite the opposite.

LAX/PHX seniority who fricken knows...i don't think anyone here does until 11/18.

Btw, what kind of ETOPS training does LAA provide for the Hawaii flying out of LAX?
Why would CLT shrink if PHX shrinks? Having a hard time seeing the correlation
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 05:53 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Pitot heat, what's to eat?
Default

Originally Posted by Hueypilot
^^^ I agree ^^^

As stated before, what you see today will not be the dynamics you'll see in a year or two.

LAX, I predict, will become much more senior. I think with the retirements, a new hire will still be able to bid into LAX within a year or two, but it won't be junior like it is today.

PHX will shrink some and I've heard of a 737 base opening there, but I don't think it'll ever be very junior.

MIA will probably get slightly more senior in the short term as the LUS Floridians move down that way (flew with a captain today who plans on bidding MIA). But ultimately it'll probably remain somewhat junior.

DFW, CLT and ORD will probably remain senior WRT to international flying, fairly senior for CA seats in general, and probably middle seniority for everything else.

PHL and NYC will stay junior is my guess. BOS will stay fairly senior because of it's size and DCA will probably stay somewhat senior, again because it's a small base.
You've basically just predicted that every base will be senior in the short term except PHL and NYC which doesn't really make any sense.

My prediction (which is worth about what you paid for it)

PHL will lose some widebody flying and the remaining widebody spots will go senior. Will remain a junior base for narrowbody although it will lose some narrowbody flying as well IMHO.

CLT will remain relatively senior and will become a popular spot for LAA pilots who live in the South to bid into.

NYC will be junior due to cost of living.

MIA will continue to be junior.

DFW will go slightly more senior due to PHX pilot influx but the overall effect will be tempered by some growth both domestic and international.

LAX will remain junior in the short term due to international growth and cost of living despite many west coast LUS'ers bidding in.

ORD will remain where it is.

STL I'm not sure... don't fully understand the effect of Sup C to comment.

PHX is at the moment "very senior" due to being a bidding island. Many will jump ship to DFW or LAX, a few will bid in, and the flying will be shrunk. Overall effect is that it continues to be senior but not as senior as it appear to be now.

BOS will grow with the addition of LUS flying to the base and it will become less senior than it is, but still overall a senior base.

DCA will lose some flying but continue to be a relatively junior base due to cost of living and nature of the trips.
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 01:02 PM
  #13  
Allegheny's Avatar
"Yinzer an'at"
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Sittin at the puter
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Why would CLT shrink if PHX shrinks? Having a hard time seeing the correlation

I agree. The thing about CLT that everyone forgets is that is the lowest cost per enplaned passenger hub in the US. Charlotte Observer....

Charlotte airport spending climbs under new leadership | The Charlotte Observer

But for airlines, the increased spending means a higher cost of doing business at Charlotte Douglas. The airport projects Charlotte’s cost-per-enplaned passenger – a measure of how much it costs the airlines to fly from an airport – will rise 8 percent in fiscal 2015.

That will leave the cost-per-enplanement at Charlotte Douglas at $1.35, still the lowest for any large hub airport in the nation. That’s still far below the national average of $10.93, airport officials said.


American Airlines – by far the airport’s biggest customer, accounting for more than 90 percent of daily flights – supports Cagle’s budget request.
“Charlotte is American’s second largest hub and we welcome any improvements that make Charlotte Douglas a better travel experience for our customers,” said spokesman Davien Anderson. Orr, the former aviation director, couldn’t be reached Friday.
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 04:06 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,123
Likes: 303
Default

When CLT was having that power struggle for who would run the airport, the outgoing manager had one plea. "Just keep your connecting costs down". They know AA will pull out/reduce because it's sole purpose is to connect passengers. Similar to PIT.

PIT was costing Airways $1 mil/week because of the high cost of doing business there. That was at a time when that sort of money meant something to the airline. So, they pulled out.

Call me crazy but I would bet over time, I'm talking 10-15 years, CLT will become even more senior and DFW will get junior as the AA guys retire. There was very little draw to the Dallas area other than the cost of living and that is really starting to spike. CLT offers quite a lot - lower cost of living, diverse terrain (mountains/Ashville area), real lake front living (only one natural lake in Texas and it's no where near Dallas).
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 04:14 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,418
Likes: 120
From: Window seat
Default

DFW - great w/b flying.

CLT - w/b poor.
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 04:19 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
When CLT was having that power struggle for who would run the airport, the outgoing manager had one plea. "Just keep your connecting costs down". They know AA will pull out/reduce because it's sole purpose is to connect passengers. Similar to PIT.

PIT was costing Airways $1 mil/week because of the high cost of doing business there. That was at a time when that sort of money meant something to the airline. So, they pulled out.

Call me crazy but I would bet over time, I'm talking 10-15 years, CLT will become even more senior and DFW will get junior as the AA guys retire. There was very little draw to the Dallas area other than the cost of living and that is really starting to spike. CLT offers quite a lot - lower cost of living, diverse terrain (mountains/Ashville area), real lake front living (only one natural lake in Texas and it's no where near Dallas).

Shhhh!

CLT sucks. Hot, humid, ice in the winter, people cannot drive. Stay away!

ps it has an e...Asheville
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 04:22 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
DFW - great w/b flying.

CLT - w/b poor.
In the last month or so I've had inquiries from 3 LAA guys from DFW about the CLT area. They and many, many jumpseat riders out of MIA, LGA and JFK don't seem to care about w/b flying.
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 05:30 PM
  #18  
Arado 234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
In the last month or so I've had inquiries from 3 LAA guys from DFW about the CLT area. They and many, many jumpseat riders out of MIA, LGA and JFK don't seem to care about w/b flying.
DFW egos are a bit on the W/B side, too. Seems like all the other LAA bases somehow dislike DFW crews. After almost one year of commuting I can see why ...
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 06:15 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,418
Likes: 120
From: Window seat
Default

R57 - after 10, 15, or 20 years of commuting, often doing w/b flying, driving to work has a great attraction.

Equipment bidding shows how guys value different flying. W/b flying, and larger jets, and longer trips, gets progressively more senior.
Reply
Old 09-26-2016 | 07:46 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Default

Because there is no rhyme or reason why PHX would shrink other than rumors that random people start. The lack of infrastructure in LAX would have an effect however that is not appearing to pull the PHX flying away. Mia and lga/Jfk/Phl can easily pull Clt flying away, ESPECIALLY wide body intl flying. FYI we should all hope all bases grow.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
lovellrt
SkyWest
15768
02-25-2016 05:47 PM
rob0087
United
2
02-20-2016 08:44 AM
pilot207
Mesa Airlines
83
07-01-2014 09:03 AM
grant123
Cargo
9
01-30-2011 09:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices