Search

Notices

Atlas Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2021 | 08:17 AM
  #18371  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 466
Likes: 58
Default

Originally Posted by Kurat
Are there updated avionics on the 767 fleet? Standardized or hodgepodge?

Also curious about 747's.......
The old joke that is actually the truth is that our 767 fleet was completely standard…until we got the second plane. It remains that way. No updated avionics.

They have had LDS(Large Display System - https://www.l2aviation.com/products/LDS ) conversions “scheduled” several different times, and every time we get to the planned start date for the conversions it gets pushed a year. I think it’s happened 3 times now. I suspect it will get pushed again based on what I’ve heard from some in MX.
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 08:20 AM
  #18372  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 466
Likes: 58
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8
Just work on the CPATs and try to have them finish before training once you get access to them. You have plenty of time for call outs flows and profiles.
How many days are they doing for systems ground school? When I went through on the 747 we had 1.5 days of systems ground school. It was basically completely self study then have 1.5 days with an instructor to ask questions. Pretty ridiculous. Hopefully they’ve changed it.

When I went to the 767 we had 2 weeks of systems ground school.

The differences between the programs are night and day.
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 08:42 AM
  #18373  
Setspeed's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 399
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by Egg320
Its so good to hear that, the firehose treatment is really bad. Is there anything you would recommend I look at for the 747 with regards to flows, profiles, call outs etc? I realize it has been said there is enough time when you get there but just wondering if it’s worth getting a head start.

As far as selection of the aircraft you want to fly, how accommodating are they? Ideally I want the 747 first followed by the 777 but could they turn around and just say we want you on the 737 or 767? Not the end of the world I guess as you can change in 18 months I believe but I presume don’t say in an interview that ‘You won’t accept the 767 or 737’

Thanks for the help.
If you don’t have much time they’ll put you on 737. >2500 hours seems like they’re willing to take your request into consideration. 747 is Atlas’s bread and butter so that seems to be the most popular spot to end up.

Also, there’s no need to work on profiles and call outs before you get to training. You’re bound to learn the wrong thing somewhere along the way if you try to find something online and it’s better if you just wait til you’re here.
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 08:53 AM
  #18374  
Egg320's Avatar
Jet Jockey Junkie
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: F.O.
Default Gateway travel

I’m just over 6000 plus with about 3000 121 time and 2600 TPIC from King Airs. I would take what I’m offered but hopefully get a widebody and that’s mainly because it’s quite a big difference in salary and flying a 747 is an itch I just have to scratch.

I know they pay for the commute and hotel etc but why would they be willing to commute you from say Honolulu to JFK obviously within the US but a large distance but not say Brisbane on the east coast of Australia to LAX, not really that much extra flight time.

I loved living in the US but just wondering why you can’t do international gateway especially as they fly to HK, Sydney, Singapore and probably even Brisbane etc.?
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 10:59 AM
  #18375  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Default

I would refrain from studying anything until you have interviewed and have a CJO with an aircraft assignment. With regard to International Gateway, probably not valuable to the company to offer it contractually. But it could be offered in the future. International fares can be a bit more volatile than domestic which may be another factor.
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 12:23 PM
  #18376  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Egg320
I’m just over 6000 plus with about 3000 121 time and 2600 TPIC from King Airs. I would take what I’m offered but hopefully get a widebody and that’s mainly because it’s quite a big difference in salary and flying a 747 is an itch I just have to scratch.

I know they pay for the commute and hotel etc but why would they be willing to commute you from say Honolulu to JFK obviously within the US but a large distance but not say Brisbane on the east coast of Australia to LAX, not really that much extra flight time.

I loved living in the US but just wondering why you can’t do international gateway especially as they fly to HK, Sydney, Singapore and probably even Brisbane etc.?
It is the way Gateway Travel is covered contractually and since we have bases and not home basing. The best way to work it is pick a gateway city far from the base that will consistently have high ticket prices and then if that ticket is cheaper then day Brisbane to base, they will be happy to book it….
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 12:38 PM
  #18377  
CRJJ's Avatar
Line Holder
5 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 166
From: B747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by HPIC
How many days are they doing for systems ground school? When I went through on the 747 we had 1.5 days of systems ground school. It was basically completely self study then have 1.5 days with an instructor to ask questions. Pretty ridiculous. Hopefully they’ve changed it.

When I went to the 767 we had 2 weeks of systems ground school.

The differences between the programs are night and day.
That's 1.5 more hours than what you get on the 73 haha.
2 weeks must be nice!.
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 01:45 PM
  #18378  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,044
Likes: 62
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by HPIC
How many days are they doing for systems ground school? When I went through on the 747 we had 1.5 days of systems ground school. It was basically completely self study then have 1.5 days with an instructor to ask questions. Pretty ridiculous. Hopefully they’ve changed it.

When I went to the 767 we had 2 weeks of systems ground school.

The differences between the programs are night and day.
The formal systems training is still the cbt, but the SITs teach you a ton of systems too, so I'd say just over a week total.
It's plenty.
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 02:45 PM
  #18379  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 466
Likes: 58
Default

Originally Posted by dera
The formal systems training is still the cbt, but the SITs teach you a ton of systems too, so I'd say just over a week total.
It's plenty.
I was referring to just classroom time, not SITs. Sounds like it’s still the same.

The 767 program has all the same CBT’s, but then about 2 weeks of classroom systems training as well. The 747 program was designed and approved when the vast majority of pilots coming in the door were current/qualified in the 747 or at least a ton of time in widebodies already. It never evolved from there as experience levels plummeted. They just tack on additional sims/class at the end of training when there’s a specific problem to address. For instance…It was only a few years ago they added a 4 hour session with nothing but landings after your type ride…and that was only because of, as I recall, about $12mil in damage done in about a year from hard landings. Half of that was on a single -8 in, I believe, Quito.
Reply
Old 11-06-2021 | 09:01 PM
  #18380  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,044
Likes: 62
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by HPIC
I was referring to just classroom time, not SITs. Sounds like it’s still the same.

The 767 program has all the same CBT’s, but then about 2 weeks of classroom systems training as well. The 747 program was designed and approved when the vast majority of pilots coming in the door were current/qualified in the 747 or at least a ton of time in widebodies already. It never evolved from there as experience levels plummeted. They just tack on additional sims/class at the end of training when there’s a specific problem to address. For instance…It was only a few years ago they added a 4 hour session with nothing but landings after your type ride…and that was only because of, as I recall, about $12mil in damage done in about a year from hard landings. Half of that was on a single -8 in, I believe, Quito.
In my experience, it is an easier training program than what regionals have. I felt it was designed for pilots who have never flown glass or FMS before. My regional and 135 training programs were much more challenging than Atlas.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astropilot92571
Hiring News
11
05-24-2025 04:48 PM
AAL763
Atlas/Polar
112
12-10-2016 04:13 PM
ProceedOnCourse
Hiring News
23
08-16-2009 06:40 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices