Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
Dead heading does not count against your 16 hours >

Dead heading does not count against your 16 hours

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Dead heading does not count against your 16 hours

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2008, 11:19 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 103
Default Dead heading does not count against your 16 hours

Just got word from scheduling that I can knowingly exceed my 16 hour duty day as long as my LAST SCHEDULED LEG is a must-ride dead head. (You know, the dead heads built into your schedule that I get paid for and being flown under 121.) I can't sit at the airport on reserve for more than 16 hours, but I can sit on a plane!! Something does not sound right here...
flyvne1971 is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 02:31 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UpThere's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Looking out the window
Posts: 148
Default

Don't quote me on this because I don't have my FOM or contract on me, but I believe there is some provision that allows the 16 hour duty limitation to be exceeded by like an hour or something if it's a DH back to domicile.
UpThere is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 02:46 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

I would not do this. If you are getting paid to DH, you are on duty. You are not allowed to be on duty more than 16 hrs because you will not have had adequate rest in the preceding 24 hrs.

I don't know if all companies call it this, but you could "limo", but then you're on your own time, off the clock, not getting paid, and you'd have to find your own way home.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 03:27 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Why do you guys have such a hard time understanding this concept? The 16 hours pertains to flight duty as a required crewmember. If you are DH in the back you are not a required crewmember, but rather just some poor schmoe with a crappy work contract. The FAA and FARs don't care about you unless you are acting as a required crewmember. If the DH was the first leg of your day it would start your 16 hour clock for flight duties.

Your contract should protect you from having to work 16+ hours, but the FAA/FARs don't in this case.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 03:47 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BLott4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: C56X
Posts: 146
Default

This happened to us all the time when I was at Mesa, of course our contract back then did not protect us. You're right, DH is not req'd crewmemember time, your rest doesn't start until the DH completes, but you can legaly DH, just can't fly. That is the legal definition, not your contractual one.
BLott4 is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 05:21 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by UpThere View Post
Don't quote me on this because I don't have my FOM or contract on me, but I believe there is some provision that allows the 16 hour duty limitation to be exceeded by like an hour or something if it's a DH back to domicile.
I can see that I guess.. but my DH was to out of Domicle. It was written in my schedule as a result of a broken plane.
flyvne1971 is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 05:24 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld View Post
Why do you guys have such a hard time understanding this concept? The 16 hours pertains to flight duty as a required crewmember. If you are DH in the back you are not a required crewmember, but rather just some poor schmoe with a crappy work contract. The FAA and FARs don't care about you unless you are acting as a required crewmember. If the DH was the first leg of your day it would start your 16 hour clock for flight duties.

Your contract should protect you from having to work 16+ hours, but the FAA/FARs don't in this case.
Originally Posted by BLott4 View Post
This happened to us all the time when I was at Mesa, of course our contract back then did not protect us. You're right, DH is not req'd crewmemember time, your rest doesn't start until the DH completes, but you can legaly DH, just can't fly. That is the legal definition, not your contractual one.

It hit me like a ton of bricks! I finally get it. Thanks!!
flyvne1971 is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 07:25 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

does anyone have a link to a copy of the whitlow letter? I'd like to see where it states in there that duty is only duty when you're a required crewmember.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 07:31 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65 View Post
does anyone have a link to a copy of the whitlow letter? I'd like to see where it states in there that duty is only duty when you're a required crewmember.
Wrong again my friend. Crewmember's duty day involves any work related duties. Flight duty involves actually flying the plane. You are definetly working if you are on a DH, but it is not flight duty. You can't log time more than 16 hours after your first job related activity. You most certainly can be performing job related duty, like a DH, more than 16 hours after showing for work.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 03:45 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65 View Post
does anyone have a link to a copy of the whitlow letter? I'd like to see where it states in there that duty is only duty when you're a required crewmember.
Here it is:

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/.../treichler.rtf

There's another one that deals with deadheading (and a few other situations) in more detail, with some examples: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...03/johnson.rtf

You should be able to find your answers (or at least more fodder for argument ;) ) between the two.

Last edited by NoyGonnaDoIt; 12-31-2008 at 03:52 AM.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
ortrucker39
Aviation Law
10
12-29-2008 06:07 PM
N6724G
Regional
96
12-14-2008 04:48 AM
MrBigAir
Aviation Law
21
11-06-2008 08:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices