Logging Heavy "Augmented" Crew Time
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 191

Anyone have a firm grasp on how to properly log all the time you are not in the seat on an augmented crew? I.E. you are a FO who is in the seat for 4 hours during cuise but not in the seat for the other 5 hours? Would you create an "other" category in your logbook much like the USAF does?
Background: 747 FO (PIC typed) on a 3 or 4 person augmented flight.
Thanks!
Background: 747 FO (PIC typed) on a 3 or 4 person augmented flight.
Thanks!

#2
Are we there yet??!!
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010

This is a damn good question. I never could get a clear answer on it but here is what I did. We had 2 Capts and 1 F/O as an augmented crew. I only logged the time I was in the seat and then in the comments section I put "Augmented Crew" and the total time.
To make it even more confusing both Capts names were on the flight plan, so how do ya log PIC on that? I still logged the time I was in the seat as PIC.
To make it even more confusing both Capts names were on the flight plan, so how do ya log PIC on that? I still logged the time I was in the seat as PIC.
#7
Are we there yet??!!
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010

I say go with the conservative approach because at this stage of the game we are not time building anymore.
#8
Are we there yet??!!
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010

Of course unless you can find some documentation that says otherwise.
#9
Are we there yet??!!
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010

Mainly because most IROs have not been checkout as Capt, only given a type rating.
Our situation was a bit different as there were two lines Capts on the flight because most of the f/os were not typed. But if 2 Capts are flying together and both are list on the flight plan as Capt, I still say you can log the time in the seat.
#10
Eats shoots and leaves...
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849

So, if you go for an interview and the interviewer notices 17 hrs in a PIC or SIC or TT columns, how do you explain that? You were not a functioning crew member for the entire 17 hrs. You may have been a required crew for the augment but not functioning the entire time.
I say go with the conservative approach because at this stage of the game we are not time building anymore.
I say go with the conservative approach because at this stage of the game we are not time building anymore.
If I'm SIC, well - I'm too damn lazy to figure out what part I was actually in the seat. I'm logging the whole flight.
If and interviewer asks - go back to my initial response. Like you said, at this stage of the game I'm not building time - just marking it!
In fairness, I haven't yet had to contend with the ultra-long haul junk - mine tend to max out at 12-14 hours, but I still just can't be bothered to care what part I'm in or out of the seat. If I'm there and I'm working, I'm logging.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post