Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Two Pilot Long Haul Ops? Airbus & Cathay >

Two Pilot Long Haul Ops? Airbus & Cathay

Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Two Pilot Long Haul Ops? Airbus & Cathay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2021, 06:06 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,418
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
What about freight trains? What’s holding back humanless freight trains from roaming the continental U.S.?
pilots are quite a bit more expensive than train conductors/engineers. (I flew with a pilot who used to be a train engineer. They don’t make much and have very few rest rules compared to FAR117.) And a train can move more than a plane.

While I agree we are probably quite a bit away from single pilot or pilotless, unfortunately I think we may see 2 pilot LH ops sooner than we think unless APLA can lobby on why this is a bad idea (fatigue) AND keep other airlines from doing this in our airspace.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 06-20-2021, 05:17 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,106
Default

Still a long ways off but will come to cargo first.
Profane Kahuna is online now  
Old 06-20-2021, 06:26 AM
  #73  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,292
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
It’s designed for an incapacitated pilot.
Yes, and that in no way constitutes the kind of autonomy actually needed to replace human pilots. It's a panic button, intended for the pax of an incapacitated single pilot... the certification threshold was: Better that the Alternative.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-20-2021, 08:23 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default Two Pilot Long Haul Ops? Airbus & Cathay

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yes, and that in no way constitutes the kind of autonomy actually needed to replace human pilots. It's a panic button, intended for the pax of an incapacitated single pilot... the certification threshold was: Better that the Alternative.

That wasn’t my point. I was answering the question I responded to. It is FAA approved certified and where the incapacitated pilot sits doesn’t matter because they will not be in control of the controls regardless of whether he is within reach of them.

But to your point, you can’t deny that this is a step in the direction of complete autonomy.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 06-20-2021, 10:25 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,273
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
That wasn’t my point. I was answering the question I responded to. It is FAA approved certified and where the incapacitated pilot sits doesn’t matter because they will not be in control of the controls regardless of whether he is within reach of them.

But to your point, you can’t deny that this is a step in the direction of complete autonomy.
Unless, of course, the incapacitated pilot is slumped over the controls…
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Old 06-20-2021, 12:36 PM
  #76  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,292
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
That wasn’t my point. I was answering the question I responded to. It is FAA approved certified and where the incapacitated pilot sits doesn’t matter because they will not be in control of the controls regardless of whether he is within reach of them.

But to your point, you can’t deny that this is a step in the direction of complete autonomy.
A small step. Almost every technical improvement today is step in that direction. I've never said it won't happen, just that people who don't have systems or computer backgrounds tend to think it's coming sooner than it really is. Also people who don't understand government, regulators, and politics.

Bottom line there are two big obstacles...

1. Robust AI which is flexible but also somehow deterministic enough to be certifiable. We don't know how to make it, and the autonomous automobile people have essentially admitted short-term defeat.

2. Up-front cost. Yes autonomy will save airlines bank BUT somebody has to pay for the R&D and certification, and revamping the entire system including ramp, taxi, and ATC. It's probably not going to be the government... eliminating 100,000 good union jobs is not really at the top of their priority list, and neither is taking bleeding-edge gambles with public safety in the interest of corporate profits.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-20-2021, 01:06 PM
  #77  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

I don’t think certified autonomous passenger aircraft are coming anytime soon… but self-driving cars are a red herring. Self driving cars are a vastly harder computational problem because roads are so non-standard let alone reacting to other drivers, pedestrians, animals and FOD. Airplane autonomy has a much narrower set of conditions to handle in normal ops and a vastly higher hardware budget per unit.

when airplanes fly themselves really isn’t related to when cars drive themselves.
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 06-20-2021, 01:11 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

How did things turn out with Air France when they let the only competent pilot leave the flight deck?
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 06-20-2021, 01:12 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by Eudaimonia View Post
Current CX 350 guy here, so this affects me directly, although I doubt I'll still be at the airline come 2025.



This has been worked on for quite some time; a number of delivery flights from Toulouse have trialed the concept. All the CX 350s have 'auto emergency descent' enabled. In a nutshell, if the cabin altitude exceeds 14000', a 15 sec countdown begins, after which the aircraft automatically commences a descent at VMO - 5 to grid MORA (+ correction for non standard temp & pressure), turns right & intercepts an approximate 3nm offset, squawks 7700, puts TCAS below, extends speed brakes, the whole lot.



So my issue is not about whether auto emergency descent will save lives if the single pilot is incapacitated, but what about the other aspects of effectively single pilot longhaul. Weather avoidance? Keeping awake during your WOCL having signed on at midnight local, when you already lose 12 nights sleep/month? A famous line from Australian Special Forces - "two is one, one is none". One pilot is no redundancy.



No doubt these sorts of things will happen eventually, but this is just a fluff piece news article to fill a void. Sure as hell won't be happening in 2025. The local regulator still thinks its 1970!
I'm curious to know if the aircraft determines whether or not there is structural damage and hence descending at VMO/MMO -5 or current airspeed or does that not matter?

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
160to4 is offline  
Old 06-20-2021, 03:27 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
How did things turn out with Air France when they let the only competent pilot leave the flight deck?
Yup, exactly. Especially when the cruise pilot is most likely going to be an MPL with close to no experience in the actual plane There are plenty of emergency situations that don't involve automatic descent, and plenty of abnormal situations which can be turned into emergencies due to inexperience.
morerightrudder is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blastboy
Cargo
42
04-11-2007 04:27 PM
CRJ-200
Major
7
08-13-2006 05:12 PM
byrdseyeviewinc
Cargo
4
06-14-2006 04:42 PM
fireman0174
Major
4
05-24-2006 08:44 AM
Savannahguy
Cargo
9
03-02-2006 12:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices