Two Pilot Long Haul Ops? Airbus & Cathay
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,418
While I agree we are probably quite a bit away from single pilot or pilotless, unfortunately I think we may see 2 pilot LH ops sooner than we think unless APLA can lobby on why this is a bad idea (fatigue) AND keep other airlines from doing this in our airspace.
#73
Yes, and that in no way constitutes the kind of autonomy actually needed to replace human pilots. It's a panic button, intended for the pax of an incapacitated single pilot... the certification threshold was: Better that the Alternative.
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Two Pilot Long Haul Ops? Airbus & Cathay
That wasn’t my point. I was answering the question I responded to. It is FAA approved certified and where the incapacitated pilot sits doesn’t matter because they will not be in control of the controls regardless of whether he is within reach of them.
But to your point, you can’t deny that this is a step in the direction of complete autonomy.
#75
That wasn’t my point. I was answering the question I responded to. It is FAA approved certified and where the incapacitated pilot sits doesn’t matter because they will not be in control of the controls regardless of whether he is within reach of them.
But to your point, you can’t deny that this is a step in the direction of complete autonomy.
But to your point, you can’t deny that this is a step in the direction of complete autonomy.
#76
That wasn’t my point. I was answering the question I responded to. It is FAA approved certified and where the incapacitated pilot sits doesn’t matter because they will not be in control of the controls regardless of whether he is within reach of them.
But to your point, you can’t deny that this is a step in the direction of complete autonomy.
But to your point, you can’t deny that this is a step in the direction of complete autonomy.
Bottom line there are two big obstacles...
1. Robust AI which is flexible but also somehow deterministic enough to be certifiable. We don't know how to make it, and the autonomous automobile people have essentially admitted short-term defeat.
2. Up-front cost. Yes autonomy will save airlines bank BUT somebody has to pay for the R&D and certification, and revamping the entire system including ramp, taxi, and ATC. It's probably not going to be the government... eliminating 100,000 good union jobs is not really at the top of their priority list, and neither is taking bleeding-edge gambles with public safety in the interest of corporate profits.
#77
Banned
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
I don’t think certified autonomous passenger aircraft are coming anytime soon… but self-driving cars are a red herring. Self driving cars are a vastly harder computational problem because roads are so non-standard let alone reacting to other drivers, pedestrians, animals and FOD. Airplane autonomy has a much narrower set of conditions to handle in normal ops and a vastly higher hardware budget per unit.
when airplanes fly themselves really isn’t related to when cars drive themselves.
when airplanes fly themselves really isn’t related to when cars drive themselves.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 300
Current CX 350 guy here, so this affects me directly, although I doubt I'll still be at the airline come 2025.
This has been worked on for quite some time; a number of delivery flights from Toulouse have trialed the concept. All the CX 350s have 'auto emergency descent' enabled. In a nutshell, if the cabin altitude exceeds 14000', a 15 sec countdown begins, after which the aircraft automatically commences a descent at VMO - 5 to grid MORA (+ correction for non standard temp & pressure), turns right & intercepts an approximate 3nm offset, squawks 7700, puts TCAS below, extends speed brakes, the whole lot.
So my issue is not about whether auto emergency descent will save lives if the single pilot is incapacitated, but what about the other aspects of effectively single pilot longhaul. Weather avoidance? Keeping awake during your WOCL having signed on at midnight local, when you already lose 12 nights sleep/month? A famous line from Australian Special Forces - "two is one, one is none". One pilot is no redundancy.
No doubt these sorts of things will happen eventually, but this is just a fluff piece news article to fill a void. Sure as hell won't be happening in 2025. The local regulator still thinks its 1970!
This has been worked on for quite some time; a number of delivery flights from Toulouse have trialed the concept. All the CX 350s have 'auto emergency descent' enabled. In a nutshell, if the cabin altitude exceeds 14000', a 15 sec countdown begins, after which the aircraft automatically commences a descent at VMO - 5 to grid MORA (+ correction for non standard temp & pressure), turns right & intercepts an approximate 3nm offset, squawks 7700, puts TCAS below, extends speed brakes, the whole lot.
So my issue is not about whether auto emergency descent will save lives if the single pilot is incapacitated, but what about the other aspects of effectively single pilot longhaul. Weather avoidance? Keeping awake during your WOCL having signed on at midnight local, when you already lose 12 nights sleep/month? A famous line from Australian Special Forces - "two is one, one is none". One pilot is no redundancy.
No doubt these sorts of things will happen eventually, but this is just a fluff piece news article to fill a void. Sure as hell won't be happening in 2025. The local regulator still thinks its 1970!
Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 516
Yup, exactly. Especially when the cruise pilot is most likely going to be an MPL with close to no experience in the actual plane There are plenty of emergency situations that don't involve automatic descent, and plenty of abnormal situations which can be turned into emergencies due to inexperience.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post