Should we be concerned for our future?
#501
Narrative fails:
The “F U Russia” UK soldiers who died to a man on Snake Island?—- uh, Ukraine came out and admitted they were actually just captured.
“The Ghost of Kiev” fighter ace footage? - uh, actually that was from a video game. There was no GOK.
“Picture of a stud-ly, photogenic heroic actor/comedian/President of UK” (that you posted) leads the fight in Kiev?——NYT reports that photo came out in May of 2021 (LAST YEAR) The suggestion is most of the videos were from last year as well.
US does this all the time (sometimes for good reasons). Read “Where Men Win Glory” about the Pat Tillman cover up —- talk about a heroic SOB who’s story was buried just to cover the brass’s ass. The follow up stories to the Jessica Lynch POW incident was another story of massive propaganda.
So yeah. Don’t “trust your own eyes”, because pictures and video are insanely 1. Highly persuasive and 2. Easy to manipulate/distort.
#502
Banned
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Interesting I bet you where not saying that when our cities where burning down. NATO has become a joke. If the United States quit funding it it would collapse. These NATO countries have no interest in their self preservation, if they did they would meet their obligations to fund NATO. NATO is useless.
#503
In major shift for Europe, Germany to spend $113B on defense
By EMILY SCHULTHEIS and LORNE COOKan hour ago
BRUSSELS (AP) — Germany announced Sunday it was committing 100 billion euros ($113 billion) to a special armed forces fund and would keep its defense spending above 2% of GDP from now on. It was one of the most significant shifts in European security policy in decades, brought on by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.The announcement by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, which came hours after Germany announced it would send weapons and other supplies directly to Ukraine, underscored how Russia’s war in Ukraine was rewriting Europe’s post-World War II security policy
And NO, absent US troops intervening which Biden has said is NOT going to happen, NATO-exUS could not defeat the Russian Army. The European armies less the US couldn’t defeat the Serb army in Yugoslavia, and they’ve gone downhill in quantity and quality since then.
That’s reality. I know you don’t like it. I don’t like it or I wouldn’t be griping about it, but that doesn’t change reality.
#504
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 18
Despite what the MSM, CIA, RINOs, and the former party of peace and tolerance want you to believe, Russia only has an interest in the ethnically Russian areas of Ukraine. This non-sense has been going on since 2014 when the CIA successfully supported a "student" revolution that removed the Ukrainian president and installed "our" guy. (They also tried to do the same thing to ethnically Russian areas of Georgia in 2008, but the Russians managed to put that one down.) Once that happened war broke out in the Eastern areas of Ukraine that lead to an unofficial Russian intervention (again, not like the CIA has never done the same thing). During that intervention the Russians shot down MH17. There has been a "ceasefire" for some time now, but they have been basically been at war ever since 2014.
Back to today. Over the weekend the Russian supported rebel forces in Eastern Ukraine said they were going to start fighting again, and I think today Russia officially recognized the breakaway regions. Vlad knows he has the west by the balls because we keep electing leftist politicians who don't understand physics or reality, and go "green" by enriching tyrants (such as Vlad himself) in places that don't exist because the the T.V hasn't told us about them. You are about to start paying for your ESG scores and all that non-sense. TBH, we need something like oil at $150/barrel and the Starbucks groupies to not be able to afford their lattes anymore to wake this country up. This is the only thing that will do it. Too many of us grew up in too much comfort, ignorance, and insulation from reality. Best to get it over with now.
Back to today. Over the weekend the Russian supported rebel forces in Eastern Ukraine said they were going to start fighting again, and I think today Russia officially recognized the breakaway regions. Vlad knows he has the west by the balls because we keep electing leftist politicians who don't understand physics or reality, and go "green" by enriching tyrants (such as Vlad himself) in places that don't exist because the the T.V hasn't told us about them. You are about to start paying for your ESG scores and all that non-sense. TBH, we need something like oil at $150/barrel and the Starbucks groupies to not be able to afford their lattes anymore to wake this country up. This is the only thing that will do it. Too many of us grew up in too much comfort, ignorance, and insulation from reality. Best to get it over with now.
#505
Banned
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Actually, THIS NATO:
https://youtu.be/ijMNq54kEj4
https://youtu.be/KuNP88kbMlk
https://youtu.be/4XbBnFxjls4
https://youtu.be/ijMNq54kEj4
https://youtu.be/KuNP88kbMlk
https://youtu.be/4XbBnFxjls4
https://youtu.be/2Cm8Su-bbmw
https://youtu.be/Vpwkdmwui3k
#506
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,200
Likes: 814
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Some of you guys act like there arevonly 2 choices: not care and do nothing or kit up and go to war.
That's ridiculous logic. We SHOULD care and we SHOULD help Ukraine. But absolutely ZERO US forces should be in the fight or supporting te fight. Scoff at sanctions all you want but they can be effective if there is broad buy in and if done correctly. We should be supplying lethal and no lethal aid as well. If Russia attempts to occupy Ukraine there will be an insurgency....... Obviously there are other ways to help as well. Again - no US Service member should ever be in the line of fire. All of the isolationist, anti-NATO rhetoric is myopic and will harm us in the medium to long term.
That's ridiculous logic. We SHOULD care and we SHOULD help Ukraine. But absolutely ZERO US forces should be in the fight or supporting te fight. Scoff at sanctions all you want but they can be effective if there is broad buy in and if done correctly. We should be supplying lethal and no lethal aid as well. If Russia attempts to occupy Ukraine there will be an insurgency....... Obviously there are other ways to help as well. Again - no US Service member should ever be in the line of fire. All of the isolationist, anti-NATO rhetoric is myopic and will harm us in the medium to long term.
I'd be OK with very limited, very LO, SOF/OGA involvement on the ground... basically to acquire info or perform specific objectives which can't be had any other way. Several good reasons to keep that clandestine of course.
#507
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,200
Likes: 814
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Had Germany done this even two or three years ago it might have made a difference in deterrence and may in the future, but as anyone who has ever fought in one will tell you, wars are a come-as-you-are affair, and this will make little if any difference in the fighting capacity of the Bundeswere or Luftwaffe in the short term.
#508
Never thought he could - or would - roll up all of Eastern Europe. This attack is already triggering the sort of reaction that will make that more difficult. Armchair soldiers debate tactics. Professionals look at logistics. You and I understand that.
#509
The only thing that didn't age well was that I said Russia wouldn't invade the rest of the Ukraine. A lot of people admit to getting that one wrong, in large part because, when the Brandon regime comes out and says that something will happen, it's quickly plays out to be false. Think covid/omicron and "a winter of sickness and death".
The rest of the statement holds true. Interventionist foreign policy, and leftist domestic policy have left our supplies of energy under the control of tyrants like Vladimir Putin. He still has us, and the entire west by the balls, and knows all he has to do is shoot oil to $150 and beyond and crush our economy. So far prices have backed off from that initial spike, and that's a good thing, but we'll see what tomorrow brings. As long as the hawks don't get their way and initiate WWIII by directly intervening, maybe this whole thing ends with just enough pain in energy prices that the 'green' energy fantasy is forgotten for good and we spend the upcoming years developing our production and accepting the fact that we need nuclear power. The Europeans are already learning that lesson in a big way after shutting down reactors to appease a 16 year old girl, and now are trying to be tough with Russia while begging them to not turn off the gas supply. Clown world.
The rest of the statement holds true. Interventionist foreign policy, and leftist domestic policy have left our supplies of energy under the control of tyrants like Vladimir Putin. He still has us, and the entire west by the balls, and knows all he has to do is shoot oil to $150 and beyond and crush our economy. So far prices have backed off from that initial spike, and that's a good thing, but we'll see what tomorrow brings. As long as the hawks don't get their way and initiate WWIII by directly intervening, maybe this whole thing ends with just enough pain in energy prices that the 'green' energy fantasy is forgotten for good and we spend the upcoming years developing our production and accepting the fact that we need nuclear power. The Europeans are already learning that lesson in a big way after shutting down reactors to appease a 16 year old girl, and now are trying to be tough with Russia while begging them to not turn off the gas supply. Clown world.
#510
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
I wonder if these harsh sanctions are exactly what Putin had hoped for. Easy to sell your citizens to all out war with the West when they’ve sanctioned your entire country into financial ruin. This has some Germany after World War I vibes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



