PRIA Training Incomplete
07-29-2023, 05:21 PM
#11
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,470
Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yes. It shouldn't be a problem with ULCC #2 because they already screened you and you can just tell them why you left if they ask and it should make sense to them.
If you ever apply to a legacy, then it will be a flag for them. You should be able to explain it away, backed up by the timing assuming that you start at ULCC #2 quickly (as opposed to eight months later).
If it were me, much under age 60, I'd probably stick it out and get the type. That way you also have less of an air gap in the event #2 stops hiring, or something bad happens with the industry, which we all know can develop in a matter of days or even minutes. Depends on your personal situation though.
If you ever apply to a legacy, then it will be a flag for them. You should be able to explain it away, backed up by the timing assuming that you start at ULCC #2 quickly (as opposed to eight months later).
If it were me, much under age 60, I'd probably stick it out and get the type. That way you also have less of an air gap in the event #2 stops hiring, or something bad happens with the industry, which we all know can develop in a matter of days or even minutes. Depends on your personal situation though.
07-29-2023, 05:46 PM
#12
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Originally Posted by dera
The biggest risk is if he then washes out from ULCC #2. That would be borderline career ending event, as on paper it would look like a back-to-back 121 failure.
07-29-2023, 08:50 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Desk
Posts: 235
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
All records are supposed to go into PRD at this time. You should be able to view it. They have to go into the database within 30 days of being generated. Title 49 USC 44703 sets forth what is recorded into the PRD, it's the same data as PRIA.
By curiosity, I looked at mine and there's nothing in there other then my info and type if I recall correctly.
I thought everything from previous employers to FAA check rides transferred to that PRD database.
07-29-2023, 09:17 PM
#14
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
Originally Posted by Charlie Waffles
Older guy here, currently in a 121 training program, in Sim, have another 121 job lined up. I have lots of time and types so I’m not super interested in finishing current training. So does the company HAVE to mark incomplete? If so in this case is it really a big deal or not?? And yes I will try to leave early and be transparent on a positive note but we all know it’s a mixed bag with Chief Whoever
Thanks
Thanks
https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/...AC_120-68J.pdf
From AC120-68J, note that:
2.6.2 The Pilot’s Role in the PRD Process. The pilot is responsible for ensuring his or her employment history is accurate and for granting consent to reviewing entities. The pilot also controls the PRD accuracy and dispute function regarding employer-generated records in their PAR.
1. 2.6.2.1 Employment History. Before granting consent to a reviewing entity, pilots must ensure their employment history is accurate and lists all operators who employed them as a pilot for the last 5 years in accordance with § 111.310. This includes employers where a pilot may have begun training, but did not finish. Keep in mind that previous employers may have entered records related to a pilot regardless if the pilot listed them in their history.
1. 2.6.2.1 Employment History. Before granting consent to a reviewing entity, pilots must ensure their employment history is accurate and lists all operators who employed them as a pilot for the last 5 years in accordance with § 111.310. This includes employers where a pilot may have begun training, but did not finish. Keep in mind that previous employers may have entered records related to a pilot regardless if the pilot listed them in their history.
07-30-2023, 01:11 PM
#15
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
Advisory Circular AC120-68J covers the basics, and should be reviewed.
https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/...AC_120-68J.pdf
From AC120-68J, note that:
https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/...AC_120-68J.pdf
From AC120-68J, note that:
Excellent information John! Much appreciated Thanks 👍
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
