Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX-contract improvements next negotiations >

FDX-contract improvements next negotiations

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX-contract improvements next negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2008, 08:35 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

How's about anything over $46K goes towards my new boat payment.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 09:25 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownGirls YUM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by skypine27 View Post
2. Remove the company's provision for assigning trips to reserve pilots out of levelling order by using the 50 TAFB and the "It fits his schedule better, sorry" excuse. I have personally seen this concession totally negate our leveling system more than once.
This is a big one. I see it ALL THE TIME. I've been on both ends of this stick.

In the last month I sat reserve, two guys were assigned trips that should have been assigned to me. One was for no good reason other than I heard they said "it fit better." The other, they moved a day on another guy instead of assigning to me.

In other months, I've been assigned trips that should have gone to someone else when I had heaps of leveling. I was quoted the above provision when I asked about it.

I've also had R-days moved on me to assign trips to me when there were others who could have covered them.

Other things we could do to improve scheduling that are low-cost/no-cost;

-Allow a pilot to pick up another pilots R-days, just like we can do with trips.

-Enforce the provision allowing us to move R-days. Contract says no "unreasonable" request will be denied. That's pile of bovine excrement. I had single R-day move from the front to the back of a block of R-days repeatedly denied with 6 guys on reserve covering 3 flights with nothing in open time (3 max indicated) in a place with only one spare aircraft.

-Relax rules on trading R-days for trips. I recently had a pilot willing to trade a one-day trip for two of my R-days. VIPS would not even allow entry of the trade saying that a pilot can only trade an entire block of R-days for a trip. No crew rest issues, no conflicts, nothing. The company ultimately lost on this one as I had to bump on an R-day to get landings for the same trip!!! Doesn't make any sense at all and wouldn't cost the company anything to allow.

My guess is that improving reserve rules is a pipe dream since reserve generally goes junior in this company. Past actions by the Mustache Mafia would indicate low priority for fixing anything that applies mostly to the junior folk. Proof otherwise would be a pleasant surprise.
BrownGirls YUM is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 09:48 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Now, I'm really confused....

Didn't I read on this forum that reserve was going senior. Because they can scam the system. Or, is it only the carryover reserve lines that go senior?

And, when you talk about not fixing anything for the "junior folk"...Aren't many of the "junior in their seat" widebody captains actually quite senior "systemwide"? You can(or used to able to) go from a very senior 727 S/O, to a very junior MD11 F/O, in one bid. So, who are the Mustache Mafia not looking out for? You as a senior S/O...Or, you as a junior F/O?

I just don't think this JUNIOR vs. SENIOR, they're out to get us argument, holds water.
Busboy is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 09:53 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

And, the reserve section of work rules at FDX has arguably had the most improvements of any section in the contract. Doesn't anyone remember when reserve used to be 24/7, with a 1 hour callout?
Busboy is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 10:02 AM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
Now, I'm really confused....

Didn't I read on this forum that reserve was going senior. Because they can scam the system. Or, is it only the carryover reserve lines that go senior?

And, when you talk about not fixing anything for the "junior folk"...Aren't many of the "junior in their seat" widebody captains actually quite senior "systemwide"? You can(or used to able to) go from a very senior 727 S/O, to a very junior MD11 F/O, in one bid. So, who are the Mustache Mafia not looking out for? You as a senior S/O...Or, you as a junior F/O?

I just don't think this JUNIOR vs. SENIOR, they're out to get us argument, holds water.

I might be able to help out. Some reserve goes very senior, R-24 with C/O. Some goes Junior, RA. But the bottomline is the last guy on the list will be on reserve for quite a while. Especially with Age 60 and the proliferation of O&B lines.

Reserve is better then when we flew Falcons but that does not mean that it can't get better. That also dosen't mean scheduling should play favorites.

But R-24 really does suck, they hose me every month. Don't know why I keep going back!

Last edited by FDXLAG; 02-04-2008 at 10:08 AM.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 11:49 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USNFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD10 FO
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by BusDawg View Post
SkyPine, Interesting point on MPDP not matching up with vacation and sick time. I think BC and his posse did a good job overall. I wonder how that got past them. The uniform allowance should at the least be adjusted to allow a person to replace their leather jacket from time-to-time. My jacket is getting pretty busted up. I'm guessing it will cost more than $150 to replace.
You still think they did a Good Job?

How are your trips and quality of life since the lines have been optimzed?

Do you realize you probably lost about 2 yrs worth of seniority/seat progression as a result of this. That's two years less Captains pay.

Did you know that BC signed a "secret letter" during negotiations that said it was ok for the company to optimize.

Other than a 3% cost of living raise and a 1% increase to your B fund, what did you as an A300 FO really get?
USNFDX is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 01:43 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

delete delete
Gunter is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 04:37 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Micro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Drinking from the fire hose
Posts: 305
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
And, the reserve section of work rules at FDX has arguably had the most improvements of any section in the contract. Doesn't anyone remember when reserve used to be 24/7, with a 1 hour callout?
Yeah, I remember it but that's no excuse for how the reserve guys are scheduled, and certainly no excuse for selling the reserves down the river on this contract!!!! I wrote the NC, under BC, about ALL these reserve problems and they blew it off (probably in favor of their "grid"). BC and his gang made the reserves worse!!!
Micro is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 04:55 PM
  #99  
Line Holder
 
nitefr8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by PicklePausePull View Post
First order of business is remove ALPA!

Then we can work on repairing all the damage done by DW and the ALPA "reps."
Remove the current MEC members, then the MEC officers first. Then you can talk about removing ALPA if that doesn't solve the problem.

What I'd submit though is that if you fail to find support for your position, then you're out of step with the crew force -- even if you're right.
nitefr8r is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 06:38 PM
  #100  
Line Holder
 
BusDawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: BOHICA
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by USNFDX View Post
You still think they did a Good Job?

How are your trips and quality of life since the lines have been optimzed?

Do you realize you probably lost about 2 yrs worth of seniority/seat progression as a result of this. That's two years less Captains pay.

Did you know that BC signed a "secret letter" during negotiations that said it was ok for the company to optimize.

Other than a 3% cost of living raise and a 1% increase to your B fund, what did you as an A300 FO really get?
I'm not a BC/NC apologist but I will stick with my "overall good job" comment. Granted, I stand reserve in Memphis so I have not experienced those optimized lines. I know folks who have had massive heartburn with BC. After they flew a trip with him and had conversations over a beer, they were way more comfortable with what we got in 2006. Not the best contract but that is what this thread is about. How can we improve it? Limiting the optimizer was on my list. I voted for the contract so I won't slam BC and his crew. I will look for improvements on the next one.
BusDawg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ellen
Regional
193
09-21-2007 06:11 PM
Ellen
Regional
11
08-29-2007 06:12 AM
ryane946
Major
5
07-24-2007 01:51 PM
Flycast
Cargo
24
07-07-2007 01:13 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices