Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Excess FDX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2008, 03:47 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
magic rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 909
Default

So if a pilot is excessed backwards, those receiving passover pay because of that pilot's previous seat position no longer receive passover?
magic rat is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 04:01 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by magic rat View Post
So if a pilot is excessed backwards, those receiving passover pay because of that pilot's previous seat position no longer receive passover?
Can't see it any other way. Call MaryNelle if you want the final word.
Gunter is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 05:41 AM
  #23  
Trust but Verify!!
 
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD11 CRA
Posts: 684
Default

"For you to want to remove that privilege because the contract doesn't have firm language is just plain mean."

What would you say about pilots with at least 25 years in at FedEx, that made WB Capt 5 years earlier due to Age 60, now forcing everyone else to go backwards because they don't want to take the retirement we negoitiated for them?
FreightDawgyDog is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 05:43 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
I wish I knew if any 727 FOs will be excess down to the 727 SO seat. It depends on how much of a bubble the company wants in the SO seat. Does the company want any bubbles or do they want even manning?
I agree with your analysis. I think company wants level manning (especially in HKG), but if they're stuck with a bubble then they'll want it in their least costly seat. Doubt if many 72FO's will go down to SO; I think many of the senior guys will jump ship like you say and the more junior FO's will consider going to ANC (if they can hold it). So the bottom guys should be safe; however, if they do go down to SO, they'll just be sitting reserve and never getting called because we'll still be fat in that seat (no furloughs). Even if they decide to have another excess, the 72SO seat will only get fatter. That is unless some are crazy enough to bid HKG...SG
Some guy is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 05:48 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by Some guy View Post
So the bottom guys should be safe; however, if they do go down to SO, they'll just be sitting reserve and never getting called because we'll still be fat in that seat (no furloughs). Even if they decide to have another excess, the 72SO seat will only get fatter. That is unless some are crazy enough to bid HKG...SG
You make a good case for living in domicile. Now that's just plain mean!
Jetjok is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:17 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by FreightDawgyDog View Post
"For you to want to remove that privilege because the contract doesn't have firm language is just plain mean."

What would you say about pilots with at least 25 years in at FedEx, that made WB Capt 5 years earlier due to Age 60, now forcing everyone else to go backwards because they don't want to take the retirement we negoitiated for them?
2 wrongs don't make a right.
Gunter is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:22 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JollyF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 318
Default Good Question

Originally Posted by FreightDawgyDog View Post
"For you to want to remove that privilege because the contract doesn't have firm language is just plain mean."

What would you say about pilots with at least 25 years in at FedEx, that made WB Capt 5 years earlier due to Age 60, now forcing everyone else to go backwards because they don't want to take the retirement we negoitiated for them?
I've flown with several dudes the past few months who are in that situation, except they've been here over 30 years and plan to stick around to "get one more type rating" in the 777. YGBSM right? They are'nt getting just one more type rating, they are taking a pass on the best retirement remaining in the industry and screwing the junior guys in the process so they can work at 1/2 pay. I'm sorry, I just don't get it.

In answer to your question, I really don't know what to say. I hate to talk about in the jet because my blood pressure gets too high. I had one of these guys tell me "don't worry, you're getting the same deal I am." How's that? By waiting an extra 3-4 years to upgrade and than choosing to work past 60 so I can earn what I would have had things not changed. It's fuzzy math at best, and the bottom line is these guys are just being greedy.

Period, Dot, EOS....
JollyF15 is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:27 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 424
Default

Jolly,
I agree with you 100%!

My question is why are we excessing from the 727/So position. It is the lowest paying job in the company and now we are giving the opportunity for guys that essentially work for free (J Lewis and friends) to move into wide body captain positions? I realize 727 Seconds are overmanned, but don't you think every position will be after the -10 excess?

This excess bid for any position other than the DC-10 is ridiculous...
nightfreight is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:35 AM
  #29  
Trust but Verify!!
 
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD11 CRA
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
2 wrongs don't make a right.
Understood. I didn't say I agreed with the first point. I was just wondering how you would characterize someone with a full retirement actually forcing others to sacrifice for them if you thought a poster making suggestion was being mean! I think his point was if FedEx and ALPA had not allowed this to begin with the problem we face now would be less severe. I really can't imagine these over 60 guys thinking they are coming back to the same job they left. It's not like everyone below them getting screwed for their sake will wave welcome banners when they hit the line again. I think there will be a lot of slam clicking on layovers very soon and new watering holes for those who were on the losing end of this whole deal.
FreightDawgyDog is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:38 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by JollyF15 View Post
I've flown with several dudes the past few months who are in that situation, except they've been here over 30 years and plan to stick around to "get one more type rating" in the 777. YGBSM right? They are'nt getting just one more type rating, they are taking a pass on the best retirement remaining in the industry and screwing the junior guys in the process so they can work at 1/2 pay. I'm sorry, I just don't get it.

In answer to your question, I really don't know what to say. I hate to talk about in the jet because my blood pressure gets too high. I had one of these guys tell me "don't worry, you're getting the same deal I am." How's that? By waiting an extra 3-4 years to upgrade and than choosing to work past 60 so I can earn what I would have had things not changed. It's fuzzy math at best, and the bottom line is these guys are just being greedy.

Period, Dot, EOS....
I agree.

BTW, they really don't buy the garbage they are floating about "it will be good for you too". They know it sucks.
Gunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Laxrox43
Cargo
77
06-05-2008 08:28 AM
Overnitefr8
Cargo
51
04-16-2008 12:33 PM
Gunter
Cargo
21
04-12-2008 07:08 PM
viperdriver
Cargo
9
01-04-2008 01:45 PM
angry tanker
Cargo
20
07-10-2007 03:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices