FDX - Excess Bid 09-03 Final
04-16-2009 | 09:06 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
09-01 FCIF says 36 FO's and with 02 and 03 they got a total of 23. Perhaps a cancellation of 01 and a posting of 04 with some FO slots?
As an aside I heard that the SCP told some LCA's that a Euro-domicile is coming very soon ...like this fall? Any one else hear this?
As an aside I heard that the SCP told some LCA's that a Euro-domicile is coming very soon ...like this fall? Any one else hear this?
04-16-2009 | 09:07 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 0
From: Gear Monkey
09-01 Vacancy bid posted for 36 FOs.
09-02 Excess bid produced 9 FOs...and 09-03 Excess bid produced 14 more.
Total from excessed bids = 23; thus, theoretically speaking they still need another 13 to "fill up" the 36 on the vacancy bid.
Last edited by DLax85; 04-16-2009 at 09:08 PM. Reason: spelling
04-16-2009 | 09:15 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
I've heard the same. Paris with the existing Buses. So I guess we can expect: cancellation of 09-01, possible new HKG FO bid, Paris FDA bid, next 777 bid, possible MEM 300 excess if they park the remaining A310-200's and don't get enough movement on 777 bid to soak it up, next 757 bid which also may tempered by what happens with the remaining A310-200's. Sound roughly correct?
04-17-2009 | 02:36 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
They do not need to cnx 09-01. The 09-01 language said these opening can be changed by upcoming excess bids. All that they need to do is close 09-01 with whatever vacancies are remaining. Their trump card was well played I must grudgingly admit.
From 09-01:
Future Bids
We are currently evaluating a realignment (excess) bid that we expect to post within a week. Therefore, it’s possible that some of these vacancies will be filled through the excess process.
From 09-01:
Future Bids
We are currently evaluating a realignment (excess) bid that we expect to post within a week. Therefore, it’s possible that some of these vacancies will be filled through the excess process.
04-17-2009 | 04:13 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
They do not need to cnx 09-01. The 09-01 language said these opening can be changed by upcoming excess bids. All that they need to do is close 09-01 with whatever vacancies are remaining. Their trump card was well played I must grudgingly admit.
From 09-01:
Future Bids
We are currently evaluating a realignment (excess) bid that we expect to post within a week. Therefore, it’s possible that some of these vacancies will be filled through the excess process.
From 09-01:
Future Bids
We are currently evaluating a realignment (excess) bid that we expect to post within a week. Therefore, it’s possible that some of these vacancies will be filled through the excess process.
I think there is something in the CBA that references that postings may not be amended after issuance, only canceled. I think it is curious that they "awarded" 20 additional CA slots on 09-01 practice bid 1.
I guess we will have to watch for the FCIF, the guy who cancels bids at FDX sure has excellent job security.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
