FDX- 2B or not 4A2B
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
...the Company shall furlough pilots in reverse order of system seniority as listed on the Master Seniority List. All pilots holding a seniority number at the time of furlough shall be subject to the provisions of Section 23 regardless of their employment status at that time...
#22
Darn that pesky CBA:
...the Company shall furlough pilots in reverse order of system seniority as listed on the Master Seniority List. All pilots holding a seniority number at the time of furlough shall be subject to the provisions of Section 23 regardless of their employment status at that time...
...the Company shall furlough pilots in reverse order of system seniority as listed on the Master Seniority List. All pilots holding a seniority number at the time of furlough shall be subject to the provisions of Section 23 regardless of their employment status at that time...
WARNING: Do not confuse FH with the facts in the CBA, he'll probably take some sort of unpredictable action against some unsuspecting f/o?
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Darn that pesky CBA:
...the Company shall furlough pilots in reverse order of system seniority as listed on the Master Seniority List. All pilots holding a seniority number at the time of furlough shall be subject to the provisions of Section 23 regardless of their employment status at that time...
...the Company shall furlough pilots in reverse order of system seniority as listed on the Master Seniority List. All pilots holding a seniority number at the time of furlough shall be subject to the provisions of Section 23 regardless of their employment status at that time...
Of the bottom 300 crewmembers...Only about 15 are HKG F/Os''s. I would think if a furlough actually happened, they'd fill some of those slots in the excess. The rest would be SIBA'd. So, HKG wouldn't be a player in a decision.
I think the secret negotiating notes and recollections of intent, from the folks that were sitting at the table when this crap was put in the CBA, is going to be more of a factor. And we all know how management negotiators have recollected the intent in past hearings.
But who knows? That's why most times one side, and many times both parties, are afraid to go to arbitration. The decisions can sometimes be surprising to everyone. It could still be settled before a decision.
Last edited by Busboy; 08-10-2009 at 12:33 PM.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Todays message.
An additional session is set for October 1-2 for additional management testimony and ALPA rebuttal testimony. We will keep you apprised of the progress of this arbitration, but this is unfortunately a lengthy process. A final resolution will be unlikely until sometime next year.
An additional session is set for October 1-2 for additional management testimony and ALPA rebuttal testimony. We will keep you apprised of the progress of this arbitration, but this is unfortunately a lengthy process. A final resolution will be unlikely until sometime next year.
#30
I could be wrong, but wasn't PC sitting at that table on (our side of the table) when the intent was created for 42ab? I would love to HEAR that testimony.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post