Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS Managers/labor law >

UPS Managers/labor law

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS Managers/labor law

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2010, 05:10 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,696
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post

You are right in that this type of situation is regulated by the individual States decision on whether or not they will be a right to work state.
Not so much. Federal law, RLA, supersedes state law (right to work). Doesn't matter if it is a right to work state or not.

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
As for your common sense question; if it were me in the judges or arbitrators seat, it would seem to me that it would be unreasonable for the company to furlough pilots then claim that they were in an emergency situation because of lack of crews.
Reminds me of the guy that kills his parents and then begs for the mercy of the court because he is an orphan
767pilot is offline  
Old 03-03-2010, 10:11 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot View Post
Not so much. Federal law, RLA, supersedes state law (right to work). Doesn't matter if it is a right to work state or not.

767,

You kind of chopped up my paragraph. When I said "this type of situation," I was referring to union shops in general, not your UPS situation. I apologize for the lack of clarity:

[Quote From New K]

"What is allowed by Taft are union shops where the company hires an individual and then afterward, they must join the union (or, at least pay dues) within 30 days or their employment start date. You are right in that this type of situation is regulated by the individual States decision on whether or not they will be a right to work state." [End Quote]

Just to keep the record straight, I believe the only points I have been making was that 1.) there is no such thing as a closed shop anymore, 2.) what your union has negotiated in your CBA does matter & 3.) past practices allowed by your union will be taken into consideration by the decision-maker if it ever comes to that.

As for your analogy, that in todays times may unfortunately be a true case, I think that is a perfect example. You guys are in good shape if that were ever to happen. If I were the IPA, I'd be filing papers the second your managers were flying a minute more than what they were before the furloughs (if they happen). Once again, good luck.

New K

Last edited by newKnow; 03-03-2010 at 10:24 PM. Reason: I reserve the right to leave all misspelled words in there, because sometimes you just don't care....
newKnow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SLPII
Cargo
231
02-08-2017 10:25 PM
JustUnderPar
Cargo
796
08-13-2010 05:43 PM
weatherman
Cargo
9
02-15-2010 02:36 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices