Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Ups

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2010 | 10:11 PM
  #111  
SeeDub's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Finally Facing Forward
Default

Originally Posted by Soyathink
...
Why not look at your Red X counterparts. You complain about UPS but look how many union jobs UPS has created since 1907? Its ok for Red X to have a mostly non union workforce except for the pilots and the pilots group doesn't care right? Maybe if there was more of a level playing field between the companies there wouldn't be a furlough. Funny how Red X drivers make far less than UPS since they are all non union but thats ok UPS managers and corporate are the "evil doers" right?

....
Just out of curiosity, How much do UPS drivers make vs FedEx Express truck drivers? vs FedEx ground drivers? I honestly don't know the answer and do want to know.

Also the issue of a level playing field is a smoke screen regarding furloughing pilots. I mean after all, UPS did clear over $2 billion in profit in 2009. I'm not sure what the forecast is for 2010 but I'll bet it's at least another $2 billion.
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 03:10 AM
  #112  
CactusCrew's Avatar
Tri-tanic operator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Doggie
Default

Originally Posted by Soyathink

Maybe if there was more of a level playing field between the companies there wouldn't be a furlough. Funny how Red X drivers make far less than UPS since they are all non union but thats ok UPS managers and corporate are the "evil doers" right?

You really do not understand corporate rhetoric or union sabre rattleing do you. Your just a pawn in the game my friend.

Total management kool-aide ...

Maybe if our uniforms were black and not brown there wouldn't be a furlough.
Maybe if our crew stairs were older and rustier, we wouldn't have to furlough.
Maybe if we paid for our own Jepps, we wouldn't have to furlough.

All of the above makes as much sense as "Maybe if there was more of a level playing field between the companies there wouldn't be a furlough"

All that quote proves is that you were paying attention at one of the required staff meetings.

MAYBE if contract openers weren't around the corner, there wouldn't be a furlough. Because UPS is the first and probably only company to COMPLETELY walk away from VOLUNTARY givebacks from a union group. When that group met 90% of the goal, the goal was changed. Yeah, this company "needed" those savings alright ...

When the FAA bill doesn't "level the playing field", can we expect more furloughs ? Maybe even a few management terminations, if they really need to save the money ....
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 03:41 AM
  #113  
Thread Starter
Gone
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
From: Gone
Default

Originally Posted by CactusCrew
UPS is the first and probably only company to COMPLETELY walk away from VOLUNTARY givebacks from a union group. When that group met 90% of the goal, the goal was changed. Yeah, this company "needed" those savings alright ...
Just curious if anyone knows if NetJets came close to the savings.
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 04:04 AM
  #114  
CactusCrew's Avatar
Tri-tanic operator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Doggie
Default

Originally Posted by FrontSeat
Just curious if anyone knows if NetJets came close to the savings.
And if they did come close, did management then say too bad, so sad ... our projections now go to 2015 and we need twice as much as we said before.

Just sayin ...
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 05:28 AM
  #115  
Gunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Soyathink


Maybe if there was more of a level playing field between the companies there wouldn't be a furlough.
UPS has a higher profit margin and their cash flow is much, much better.

This idea of yours has no merit.
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 01:17 PM
  #116  
Airbum's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 674
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by Naven
Actually we didn't have enough participation to meet the agreed to #'s. Also most of the savings came from the bottom 300 and the company couldn't give them all the agreed to time off and still run ANC. If there had been more participation across the seniority list the MOU would have still been in effect. Also it sucks to see those that didn't participate now go out of their way to increase their pay by doing vacation on days off, trading low time for high time trips, and restoring sick time by picking up way more hours than they called in sick for.
It is correct we failed to meet the agreed upon number. Am I mistaken thinking the Ila requested more time and the company said no

I have not seen any exact numbers off who gave what besides the fact 97% of the bottom 300 gave something. I don't think anyboby knows where most of the savings came from.

Yep I hate to see folks not abiding by EB guidelines also. But I M realistic enough to know that some will not. However it appears to me the vast majority of members are holding the line.
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 02:08 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
UPS has a higher profit margin and their cash flow is much, much better.

This idea of yours has no merit.
Did you know every division, every center and every department is run separately and has a profit and loss for each? If the Airline division isn't making a certian margin then they have to cut costs. The Airline did not make 2 billion in profit. Just hired pilots, age 65 passed and the worst economic times caused a "Perfect Storm". The air division was over staffed. UPS cut back everywhere in the entire company except the pilot group until now. Customers have moved from air to ground in this economy. Think of Bear Stearns and how many air letters they shipped. They don't exist anymore. I guess that was UPS' fault huh
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 02:35 PM
  #118  
SeeDub's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Finally Facing Forward
Default

Originally Posted by Soyathink
Did you know every division, every center and every department is run separately and has a profit and loss for each? If the Airline division isn't making a certian margin then they have to cut costs. The Airline did not make 2 billion in profit. Just hired pilots, age 65 passed and the worst economic times caused a "Perfect Storm". The air division was over staffed. UPS cut back everywhere in the entire company except the pilot group until now. Customers have moved from air to ground in this economy. Think of Bear Stearns and how many air letters they shipped. They don't exist anymore. I guess that was UPS' fault huh
In round numbers, do you know what the profit or loss was for the airline side of the house?
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 04:23 PM
  #119  
CactusCrew's Avatar
Tri-tanic operator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Doggie
Default

Originally Posted by SeeDub
In round numbers, do you know what the profit or loss was for the airline side of the house?

Its not about profit or loss, as the man said, it is about the margin ...


If the Airline division isn't making a certian margin then they have to cut costs.

And it wasn't LARGE enough. But then we have managers here that think if our crews request an extra meal on a long flight that it will bankrupt the company. no joke ...
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 04:35 PM
  #120  
Night_Hawk's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: F/O
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
I don't find that restriction. The 96 hours for the crewmember can be exceded with vacation and training , makes almost a non restriction. if its 89 hours they still have a twenty percent more untilization out of every pilot still on the property. They maintain that we have 300 to many now, if we end up at 2500 and they use that twenty percent we could end up at 2k. Grim.
Article 13.B.1 d

Int'l = 89.6 hrs/ domestic = 86 hrs. per pay period.

You are right about vacation and training.

I agree that it is way too much extra time available . I would call/ negotiate for a 78hr cap, but it would never pass.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SLPII
Cargo
240
02-08-2017 10:25 PM
JustUnderPar
Cargo
832
08-13-2010 05:43 PM
757mech
Cargo
24
06-07-2010 07:34 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices