Ups
#111
...
Why not look at your Red X counterparts. You complain about UPS but look how many union jobs UPS has created since 1907? Its ok for Red X to have a mostly non union workforce except for the pilots and the pilots group doesn't care right? Maybe if there was more of a level playing field between the companies there wouldn't be a furlough. Funny how Red X drivers make far less than UPS since they are all non union but thats ok UPS managers and corporate are the "evil doers" right?
....
Why not look at your Red X counterparts. You complain about UPS but look how many union jobs UPS has created since 1907? Its ok for Red X to have a mostly non union workforce except for the pilots and the pilots group doesn't care right? Maybe if there was more of a level playing field between the companies there wouldn't be a furlough. Funny how Red X drivers make far less than UPS since they are all non union but thats ok UPS managers and corporate are the "evil doers" right?
....
Also the issue of a level playing field is a smoke screen regarding furloughing pilots. I mean after all, UPS did clear over $2 billion in profit in 2009. I'm not sure what the forecast is for 2010 but I'll bet it's at least another $2 billion.
#112
Maybe if there was more of a level playing field between the companies there wouldn't be a furlough. Funny how Red X drivers make far less than UPS since they are all non union but thats ok UPS managers and corporate are the "evil doers" right?
You really do not understand corporate rhetoric or union sabre rattleing do you. Your just a pawn in the game my friend.
Total management kool-aide ...
Maybe if our uniforms were black and not brown there wouldn't be a furlough.
Maybe if our crew stairs were older and rustier, we wouldn't have to furlough.
Maybe if we paid for our own Jepps, we wouldn't have to furlough.
All of the above makes as much sense as "Maybe if there was more of a level playing field between the companies there wouldn't be a furlough"
All that quote proves is that you were paying attention at one of the required staff meetings.
MAYBE if contract openers weren't around the corner, there wouldn't be a furlough. Because UPS is the first and probably only company to COMPLETELY walk away from VOLUNTARY givebacks from a union group. When that group met 90% of the goal, the goal was changed. Yeah, this company "needed" those savings alright ...
When the FAA bill doesn't "level the playing field", can we expect more furloughs ? Maybe even a few management terminations, if they really need to save the money ....
#113
Thread Starter
Gone
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
From: Gone
Just curious if anyone knows if NetJets came close to the savings.
#114
#115
#116
Actually we didn't have enough participation to meet the agreed to #'s. Also most of the savings came from the bottom 300 and the company couldn't give them all the agreed to time off and still run ANC. If there had been more participation across the seniority list the MOU would have still been in effect. Also it sucks to see those that didn't participate now go out of their way to increase their pay by doing vacation on days off, trading low time for high time trips, and restoring sick time by picking up way more hours than they called in sick for.
I have not seen any exact numbers off who gave what besides the fact 97% of the bottom 300 gave something. I don't think anyboby knows where most of the savings came from.
Yep I hate to see folks not abiding by EB guidelines also. But I M realistic enough to know that some will not. However it appears to me the vast majority of members are holding the line.
#117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
#118
Did you know every division, every center and every department is run separately and has a profit and loss for each? If the Airline division isn't making a certian margin then they have to cut costs. The Airline did not make 2 billion in profit. Just hired pilots, age 65 passed and the worst economic times caused a "Perfect Storm". The air division was over staffed. UPS cut back everywhere in the entire company except the pilot group until now. Customers have moved from air to ground in this economy. Think of Bear Stearns and how many air letters they shipped. They don't exist anymore. I guess that was UPS' fault huh

#119
Its not about profit or loss, as the man said, it is about the margin ...
If the Airline division isn't making a certian margin then they have to cut costs.
And it wasn't LARGE enough. But then we have managers here that think if our crews request an extra meal on a long flight that it will bankrupt the company. no joke ...
#120
I don't find that restriction. The 96 hours for the crewmember can be exceded with vacation and training , makes almost a non restriction. if its 89 hours they still have a twenty percent more untilization out of every pilot still on the property. They maintain that we have 300 to many now, if we end up at 2500 and they use that twenty percent we could end up at 2k. Grim.
Int'l = 89.6 hrs/ domestic = 86 hrs. per pay period.
You are right about vacation and training.
I agree that it is way too much extra time available . I would call/ negotiate for a 78hr cap, but it would never pass.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



