Corporate Air Bleeds Purple
#52
No he hasn't. It is written into the contract that if there is a major change in the circumstances of the business (i.e. being re-classified under NLRA) that they will not take delivery of 15 of the 777s. This is a contract that both FedEx and Boeing both agreed to and signed. If the Boeing workers want to be angry at someone, maybe they should look towards Chicago.
#53
Soya,
One day, perhaps years from now, you'll look back and see you wished you had applied at Purple instead of Brown. You do know some choose Purple over Brown, right? You say you hate how purple treats people but you're seeing many more lives being ruined by layoffs at Brown. Even with higher profit margin, cash flow and market dominance.
Ask a furloughed Brown pilot if he would have rather had a pay cut and stayed on the payroll like at Purple. Ask them how they like the pilot schedules getting plussed up as they furlough. Ask them how they like their fellow IPA'ers pulling down overtime now. Ask them what they think of the wonderful union brotherhood that is supposed to protect them from rampant cost cutting to increase management bonuses. Ask yourself if folks should be laid off to increase the pay of those hired before you. But you won't.
You just want to see pain inflicted on others in the hope it will reduce your pain and increase your income. You saw DHL get kicked out the market, liked it and now you want UPS to take over the entire market. You could care less how disrupting (destroying?) another company's business would affect the lives of their employees. It's diabolical and makes me sick.
You can stop hiding behind your call for worker rights. You don't care and all of us can see that. It's just a tool in your bag to justify the call to help you improve your investments. Take your draconian Brown culture elsewhere. It's not wanted here.
One day, perhaps years from now, you'll look back and see you wished you had applied at Purple instead of Brown. You do know some choose Purple over Brown, right? You say you hate how purple treats people but you're seeing many more lives being ruined by layoffs at Brown. Even with higher profit margin, cash flow and market dominance.
Ask a furloughed Brown pilot if he would have rather had a pay cut and stayed on the payroll like at Purple. Ask them how they like the pilot schedules getting plussed up as they furlough. Ask them how they like their fellow IPA'ers pulling down overtime now. Ask them what they think of the wonderful union brotherhood that is supposed to protect them from rampant cost cutting to increase management bonuses. Ask yourself if folks should be laid off to increase the pay of those hired before you. But you won't.
You just want to see pain inflicted on others in the hope it will reduce your pain and increase your income. You saw DHL get kicked out the market, liked it and now you want UPS to take over the entire market. You could care less how disrupting (destroying?) another company's business would affect the lives of their employees. It's diabolical and makes me sick.
You can stop hiding behind your call for worker rights. You don't care and all of us can see that. It's just a tool in your bag to justify the call to help you improve your investments. Take your draconian Brown culture elsewhere. It's not wanted here.
Last edited by Gunter; 07-10-2010 at 09:09 AM.
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 397
Soya,
One day, perhaps years from now, you'll look back and see you wished you had applied at Purple instead of Brown. You do know some choose Purple over Brown, right? You say you hate how purple treats people but you're seeing many more lives being ruined by layoffs at Brown. Even with higher profit margin, cash flow and market dominance..
One day, perhaps years from now, you'll look back and see you wished you had applied at Purple instead of Brown. You do know some choose Purple over Brown, right? You say you hate how purple treats people but you're seeing many more lives being ruined by layoffs at Brown. Even with higher profit margin, cash flow and market dominance..
Yes I do. Some like Red, some like blue, Fred likes Green...
Yes I hate seeing layoffs at Brown. Never once said Brown isn't hard on it's employees or has made bad decisions. Matter of fact I have said the opposite.
Brown has triple the profits yet also the triple the labor cost. Fred is afraid that he will lose his little hiding spot under current law causing his labor cost to be in line with UPS. Cash flow is from not having 11 corporate jets, fancy crew buses ect. (Lower operating costs) Market Dominance, Hardly
Ask a furloughed Brown pilot if he would have rather had a pay cut and stayed on the payroll like at Purple. Ask them how they like the pilot schedules getting plussed up as they furlough. Ask them how they like their fellow IPA'ers pulling down overtime now. Ask them what they think of the wonderful union brotherhood that is supposed to protect them from rampant cost cutting to increase management bonuses. Ask yourself if folks should be laid off to increase the pay of those hired before you. But you won't..
You just want to see pain inflicted on others in the hope it will reduce your pain and increase your income. You saw DHL get kicked out the market, liked it and now you want UPS to take over the entire market. You could care less how disrupting (destroying?) another company's business would affect the lives of their employees. It's diabolical and makes me sick..
Why do you have in your avatar "Whats going on at UPS" when you are Purple? Why do you care other than to put down brown and spread false propaganda. Did you use to work at brown????
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
You have said "do not care" more than once
Yet you still defend it.
You said if I "got my way" Sorry I'm not Fred Smith. That is not my way....... He has a history but you don't see that. See the link provided that might help....
My goal is to keep people working but since your related to Freddy you wouldn't understand. Was Toddle House anygood anyhow?
From ALPA Crewroom regarding Fed Ex.
https://crewroom.alpa.org/fdx/Deskto...cumentID=19085
Again it is at:
https://crewroom.alpa.org/fdx/Deskto...cumentID=19085
Fred has threatened to pull Boeing contracts if he doesn't get his way, he has threatened the pilots if they were to strike they would be replaced. It all out there for people to see. UPS and the teamsters just want the even playing field. It wouldn't be anybodys fault but Freds if anybody loses jobs at Fed Ex. Just as the people at Boeing on the 777 how they feel if Fred cancels the contract
Fred Smith continues to try to have his cake and eat it too all at the expense of everybody else and at all cost to defeat them.
Yet you still defend it.
You said if I "got my way" Sorry I'm not Fred Smith. That is not my way....... He has a history but you don't see that. See the link provided that might help....
My goal is to keep people working but since your related to Freddy you wouldn't understand. Was Toddle House anygood anyhow?
From ALPA Crewroom regarding Fed Ex.
https://crewroom.alpa.org/fdx/Deskto...cumentID=19085
Again it is at:
https://crewroom.alpa.org/fdx/Deskto...cumentID=19085
Fred has threatened to pull Boeing contracts if he doesn't get his way, he has threatened the pilots if they were to strike they would be replaced. It all out there for people to see. UPS and the teamsters just want the even playing field. It wouldn't be anybodys fault but Freds if anybody loses jobs at Fed Ex. Just as the people at Boeing on the 777 how they feel if Fred cancels the contract
Fred Smith continues to try to have his cake and eat it too all at the expense of everybody else and at all cost to defeat them.
You have said some many things and everytime you are corrected you change the subject, 5 posts later you are reposting the same complaints. You have stated fedex ground and air will merge sooner or later. Now you say they wont.
You attack Fred Smith for working in the system and making it work to his advantage. What do you want him to do? You claim he has made statement detrimental to unions. Are these statement criminal? Are they actionable in any way. Can you prove these statements were made. Can you prove these statements are wrong? If you were CEO what would you do? Do you think your stock value would go up or down after you did it?
You have earned the distinction of being the 1st and only member on my ignore list. Bye Bye.
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 397
No he hasn't. It is written into the contract that if there is a major change in the circumstances of the business (i.e. being re-classified under NLRA) that they will not take delivery of 15 of the 777s. This is a contract that both FedEx and Boeing both agreed to and signed. If the Boeing workers want to be angry at someone, maybe they should look towards Chicago.
So every paper and news org. got it wrong. Fred was never quoted saying that ?
Revoking the special status could make it easier for drivers at FedEx's core express business to form a union and would allow them to strike -- providing a powerful negotiating tool during contract negotiations that potentially could increase the company's labor costs.
Here is a link to one of many
Labor law jeopardizes Boeing order, FedEx CEO says - MarketWatch
"If that were to happen, I can promise you that the board of directors of FedEx Corp. would reduce the amount that we invest in [FedEx Express], to the point where it was just purely a sustenance level," said Chief Executive Frederick Smith, according to a report Sunday in the Commercial Appeal of Memphis.
Smith added that the company would be forced to halt fleet and employment growth, the newspaper said.
By threatening to cancel the aircraft order from Boeing, Smith is trying to nettle the U.S. Senate into vetoing any proposed changes. The aircraft manufacturer has many allies in Congress and production lines spread out over 48 states.
The FedEx order represents about 2.7% of Boeing's total backlog of about $250 billion in orders, expected to keep the company busy for the next seven years.
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 397
Soju,
You have said some many things and everytime you are corrected you change the subject, 5 posts later you are reposting the same complaints. You have stated fedex ground and air will merge sooner or later. Now you say they wont.
You attack Fred Smith for working in the system and making it work to his advantage. What do you want him to do? You claim he has made statement detrimental to unions. Are these statement criminal? Are they actionable in any way. Can you prove these statements were made. Can you prove these statements are wrong? If you were CEO what would you do? Do you think your stock value would go up or down after you did it?
You have earned the distinction of being the 1st and only member on my ignore list. Bye Bye.
You have said some many things and everytime you are corrected you change the subject, 5 posts later you are reposting the same complaints. You have stated fedex ground and air will merge sooner or later. Now you say they wont.
You attack Fred Smith for working in the system and making it work to his advantage. What do you want him to do? You claim he has made statement detrimental to unions. Are these statement criminal? Are they actionable in any way. Can you prove these statements were made. Can you prove these statements are wrong? If you were CEO what would you do? Do you think your stock value would go up or down after you did it?
You have earned the distinction of being the 1st and only member on my ignore list. Bye Bye.
I want Fred to play fair like his competitors have to. I made those statements and provided what the ALPA has said. Could be and have been in cases. Could be and have been in cases. Can you prove that they were not???? If I were the CEO I would work with my employees on solutions. Not pay them less than their counterparts to steal business from the competition. I wouldn't hide under an unfair law to keep them from unionizing. I would let them decide. I wouldn't have 11 corporate jets. Hell why do you need 11???? My stock value would go up and I would keep people working because they would have a good attitudes and work as partners. I would demand hard work but reward with great pay. Google Jim Casey
I don't really care if you ignore me. I am providing you the proof you wanted regarding you best buddy Fred. I made those claims yep. According you the ALPA website they seem to back them up. But you claim to be ALPA .
So ignore me... I will counter you over and over if I feel its worth merit. Have fun keeping your head in the sand.
Last edited by Soyathink; 07-10-2010 at 10:50 AM.
#58
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 98
FedEx was established as an airline. Airlines are regulated by the RLA. That isn’t “hiding under the law”.
How does one “steal business” in America? Business is open to competition. Salesmen present the best case they can for their product. It is up to the consumer to see through false arguments such as “FedEx can’t strike”.
UPS and the UPS unions should focus on UPS problems.
How does one “steal business” in America? Business is open to competition. Salesmen present the best case they can for their product. It is up to the consumer to see through false arguments such as “FedEx can’t strike”.
UPS and the UPS unions should focus on UPS problems.
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
soya,
Maybe you should spend more time looking for work than arguing with pilots on a message board. Just an idea.
Of course Fred doesn't want employees to be able to unionize on a local level. It is about green. If these employees want to unionize, they have a means to do so, just like the pilots. I could care less if they unionize or not, just because I belong to a union doesn't mean I think everyone should be unionized. If they are being mistreated or underpaid, send out notices and vote in a union.
Is he using the 777 order to put pressure on some in Congress? Absolutely. Is anyone denying this? Is UPS putting political pressure to change Fedex's status? Absolutely.
Sounds also like you'd be a terrible employer. You'd give away the store and then we'd all be laid off. Fred Smith is trying to keep costs down. Isn't that his job? While keeping costs down, Fedex continually makes the "top places to work" list. Why would he want to level the playing field?
Your posts are nonsense. Go find a job
Maybe you should spend more time looking for work than arguing with pilots on a message board. Just an idea.
Of course Fred doesn't want employees to be able to unionize on a local level. It is about green. If these employees want to unionize, they have a means to do so, just like the pilots. I could care less if they unionize or not, just because I belong to a union doesn't mean I think everyone should be unionized. If they are being mistreated or underpaid, send out notices and vote in a union.
Is he using the 777 order to put pressure on some in Congress? Absolutely. Is anyone denying this? Is UPS putting political pressure to change Fedex's status? Absolutely.
Sounds also like you'd be a terrible employer. You'd give away the store and then we'd all be laid off. Fred Smith is trying to keep costs down. Isn't that his job? While keeping costs down, Fedex continually makes the "top places to work" list. Why would he want to level the playing field?
Your posts are nonsense. Go find a job
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 397
FedEx was established as an airline. Airlines are regulated by the RLA. That isn’t “hiding under the law”.
How does one “steal business” in America? Business is open to competition. Salesmen present the best case they can for their product. It is up to the consumer to see through false arguments such as “FedEx can’t strike”.
UPS and the UPS unions should focus on UPS problems.
How does one “steal business” in America? Business is open to competition. Salesmen present the best case they can for their product. It is up to the consumer to see through false arguments such as “FedEx can’t strike”.
UPS and the UPS unions should focus on UPS problems.
Business is open to competition but when one company is governed under one law and manipulates it while the other isn't and cannot then???? Read the RLA under the .gov site regarding work stoppagess. Also look when the Fed Ex Pilots threatened a work stoppage. I povided links in other thread and on this one that Fed Ex Express said if the pilots struck they would divert volume to their 40,000 trucks and lease aircraft and crews. I though they are an airline? How can they divert volume to trucks when they are an airline?
UPS and UPS unions are focusing on UPS problems, thats why the Teamsters and UPS (who would have thought that?) are fighting the Fed Ex classification together.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post