Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Cargo Cut-out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2011, 05:20 PM
  #1  
8 and counting
Thread Starter
 
Aribusdude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Airbus 300 CAPT
Posts: 12
Default Cargo Cut-out

Although I am very upset at the FAA wording and basic write-off of cargo pilot's in the new rules, let's hold the phone. It occurres to me the devil is in the details. Before we go off half loaded, consider that if we do participate in the new rules we may make this job uncommutable. Can you say....move to MEM!!! I have not read the rules...isn't there 300 odd pages? I'll let the scheduling SIG guys tear it up. I think we can do better by staying out and negotiating with the Company. I suspect our current contract meets much of the new rules. I have no desire to be limited to 3 hub turns if that is in the new rules. I'm just feeling good at the 3rd night. No thanks to working 3 on 3 off etc. Wish we still had the week on/week off 6 day trips. Hate working the 3rd week penalty trip. Let's get all the facts from the document before we slit our own throats.
Aribusdude is offline  
Old 12-26-2011, 06:22 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trigg41's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 113
Default

What about the guys that live in Memphis. I would like the 3 on 3 off deal. That week of hub turns is nuts!
trigg41 is offline  
Old 12-26-2011, 06:27 PM
  #3  
Nice lookin' tree, there!
 
frozenboxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD-11, old man
Posts: 2,198
Default

Originally Posted by Aribusdude View Post
Although I am very upset at the FAA wording and basic write-off of cargo pilot's in the new rules, let's hold the phone. It occurres to me the devil is in the details. Before we go off half loaded, consider that if we do participate in the new rules we may make this job uncommutable. Can you say....move to MEM!!! I have not read the rules...isn't there 300 odd pages? I'll let the scheduling SIG guys tear it up. I think we can do better by staying out and negotiating with the Company. I suspect our current contract meets much of the new rules. I have no desire to be limited to 3 hub turns if that is in the new rules. I'm just feeling good at the 3rd night. No thanks to working 3 on 3 off etc. Wish we still had the week on/week off 6 day trips. Hate working the 3rd week penalty trip. Let's get all the facts from the document before we slit our own throats.
All good points.
fbh
frozenboxhauler is offline  
Old 12-26-2011, 07:36 PM
  #4  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default Far 117

I've read most of it (granted at a very fast pace and did not get all the details). This is what I can tell you - with the exception of the extension to 16 hours during an "Operational Emergency" the new rules look a lot like our current contract! And, the 3 on 3 off is not a player if you have the opportunity to get 2 hours rest between duty periods - so it would not change our week of hub turning.


Standard disclaimer - I am not a lawyer or expert on interpreting the FAR's but I have slept at a Holiday Inn before
MaxKts is offline  
Old 12-27-2011, 05:18 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SeeDub's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Finally Facing Forward
Posts: 216
Default

I agree with Airbusdude. The cutout may be a blessing in disguise.
SeeDub is offline  
Old 12-27-2011, 05:43 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CloudSailor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,055
Default

I also agree airbusdude, although I have not read Part 117 in its entirety. One big thing I did catch, if I am right, is that transportation to/from hotel will count as duty time. That will affect layover hotels in a big way. I personally enjoy downtown/scenic layovers. Staying in a nice area that can be explored is a huge benefit. Staying right by the airport with the standard chain restaurants, not so great, IMO.
I agree that from the FedEx perspective our CBA already covers many safety issues from Part 117, although obviously not all. Hopefully we an use this as a negotiating platform a Albie pointed out so well in that other thread.
For those of you who live in Memphis, I'm sorry .
CloudSailor is offline  
Old 12-27-2011, 06:49 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by CloudSailor View Post
I also agree airbusdude, although I have not read Part 117 in its entirety. One big thing I did catch, if I am right, is that transportation to/from hotel will count as duty time. That will affect layover hotels in a big way. I personally enjoy downtown/scenic layovers. Staying in a nice area that can be explored is a huge benefit. Staying right by the airport with the standard chain restaurants, not so great, IMO.
I agree that from the FedEx perspective our CBA already covers many safety issues from Part 117, although obviously not all. Hopefully we an use this as a negotiating platform a Albie pointed out so well in that other thread.
For those of you who live in Memphis, I'm sorry .
local ground transportation is not "duty" like today, but if the ground times are excessive and you had a min layover it could result in being "counted" as to not get you your 8 hours.

At our company, we have a minimum 10:15 domestic layover already and 12-14 international so this should not cause much problem except for some exceptionally short international layovers in which case the beenfit of being downtown, even today, is not a big deal to me in those cases.

from the regs explanation:

Carriers will be required to provide their crew with a 10-hour rest opportunity prior to commencing a duty period that includes flying. While the 10-rest period may include the amount of time it takes to get to or from a flightcrew member’s house or hotel room, the actual amount of time required for a sleep opportunity may not be reduced below 8 hours

lots more reading required by our scheduling pros before we do anything stupid,in the end though one level of safety should be one level of safety ! no carrier should get a pass or be able to hold a decision like this out as bargaining fodder. Science based rules, that were largely based on comments from cargo pilots and those that need the nighttime protections is criminal that we are even having this discussion.

I for one am taking it to my congressman and we all need to be doing that and fight this in the public eye. IMHO.
4A2B is offline  
Old 12-27-2011, 07:17 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

Originally Posted by 4A2B View Post

At our company, we have a minimum 10:15 domestic layover already.

You may want to check our contract.

  1. A domestic rest period shall be scheduled for not less than 9 hours (8 hours when the following duty period consists entirely of deadhead to base), and shall operationally be not less than 8 hours.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 12-27-2011, 08:01 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 62
Default

Originally Posted by CloudSailor View Post
I also agree airbusdude, although I have not read Part 117 in its entirety. One big thing I did catch, if I am right, is that transportation to/from hotel will count as duty time. That will affect layover hotels in a big way. I personally enjoy downtown/scenic layovers. Staying in a nice area that can be explored is a huge benefit. Staying right by the airport with the standard chain restaurants, not so great, IMO.
I agree that from the FedEx perspective our CBA already covers many safety issues from Part 117, although obviously not all. Hopefully we an use this as a negotiating platform a Albie pointed out so well in that other thread.
For those of you who live in Memphis, I'm sorry .
What are you "sorry" about, Cloud?
Purpltail is offline  
Old 12-27-2011, 08:18 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
You may want to check our contract.

  1. A domestic rest period shall be scheduled for not less than 9 hours (8 hours when the following duty period consists entirely of deadhead to base), and shall operationally be not less than 8 hours.
this is what mine says

3. Domestic Crew Planning Limitations
Crew Planning limitations shall apply until 48 hours prior to showtime of a trip or series of trips, except that such limitations do not apply to a sequence of trips that includes an optional assignment (e.g., make-up, trip trade, volunteer or draft). Trips constructed and revisions that occur after that time shall be governed by Section 12.C.4. through C.6., as applicable.
a. Layover Minimum
A layover preceding duty as an operating pilot shall be scheduled for at least 10:15 hours. A layover preceding deadhead duty may be scheduled to a minimum of 8 hours.

you are probably quoting the operational rules, not pre planning or bid packs.
4A2B is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
jungle
Cargo
110
11-08-2010 09:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Major
24
02-03-2008 08:59 PM
CargoBob
Major
58
01-15-2007 08:20 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
1
05-21-2006 09:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices