757/767 reserve pay

Reply Subscribe

Page 4 of 12

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-25-2013, 10:07 AM

#31

pinseeker

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2006

Posts: 1,820

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyC

I agree.

So, explain to me why the MEC Chairman and Council 22 Officers have told us that litigation would be probable.

So are you against the LOA and for a single bidpack that would pay NB rates unless you touch a 767, or are you just trying to find a way to poke at the people who you think got you recalled? People litigate things every day, and surprisingly enough, both sides think they are right. How's that FDA LOA that you supported working out?

03-25-2013, 10:08 AM

#32

TonyC

Organizational Learning 

Joined APC: Nov 2005

Position: Directly behind the combiner

Posts: 4,948

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinseeker

You can deny it all you want, but your actions scream a different story.

Thank you for your meaningful contribution to the dialogue.

.

03-25-2013, 10:11 AM

#33

TonyC

Organizational Learning 

Joined APC: Nov 2005

Position: Directly behind the combiner

Posts: 4,948

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinseeker

People litigate things every day, ...

Pilot unions don't.

Maybe you should take a look at the Railway Labor Act.

.

03-25-2013, 10:19 AM

#34

4A2B

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: May 2009

Posts: 556

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyC

So, explain to me why the MEC Chairman and Council 22 Officers have told us that litigation would be probable.

Did you email or call him to let him explain it to you?

03-25-2013, 10:23 AM

#35

TonyC

Organizational Learning 

Joined APC: Nov 2005

Position: Directly behind the combiner

Posts: 4,948

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4A2B

Did you email or call him to let him explain it to you?

I e-mailed my Local Council officers -- I described the response in another post.

I did not e-mail the MEC Chairman. He still hasn't answered my last e-mail to him.

I have not gotten an explanation yet.

.

03-25-2013, 10:39 AM

#36

Gunter

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2006

Posts: 3,931

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyC

That sounds unprofessional of him. He should respond.

I'm glad you brought the issue here so we could also ask for answers.

Not saying I agree, but I do think issues deserve to be aired.

03-25-2013, 11:25 AM

#37

pinseeker

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2006

Posts: 1,820

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyC

Thank you for your meaningful contribution to the dialogue.

.

Thank you Tony. I do think questioning your motives is a meaningful contribution, just as you think questioning the MEC's or LEC 22's motives contribute to the 767 LOA dialogue.

03-25-2013, 11:28 AM

#38

pinseeker

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2006

Posts: 1,820

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyC

I feel your pain. I remember when the MEC was going to vote on whether to end the bridge contract after one year and my block rep wouldn't answer any of my e-mails.

03-25-2013, 01:06 PM

#39

Gunter

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2006

Posts: 3,931

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinseeker

I feel your pain. I remember when the MEC was going to vote on whether to end the bridge contract after one year and my block rep wouldn't answer any of my e-mails.

That rep should be held accountable.

03-25-2013, 02:09 PM

#40

IslanderDriver

Slaving away

Joined APC: Dec 2007

Position: Gear Mover

Posts: 433

"I don't care about the 767 LOA, I'm not going to bid it anyways."
Quote from fellow crewmember when asked if they'd read the LOA yet.
Hope this isn't the normal attitude of those "not going to bid it anyways".