Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Panel Splits on Raising Airline Pilot Retirement Age >

Panel Splits on Raising Airline Pilot Retirement Age

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Panel Splits on Raising Airline Pilot Retirement Age

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2017, 04:22 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Anyone with ANY experience in the airline business knows there is no such thing as "career expectations". Ask any Pan Am, Wien, Eastern, TWA, Capitol, Braniff, Midwest Express, Midway, etc. ad infinitium pilot what happened to their "career expectations".

Nothing is promised in piloting and wise pilots are prepared for the ups and downs of the career.
Packrat is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 05:01 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Always Fly With Favorite Captain
Posts: 376
Default

Originally Posted by aa010175 View Post
What's K4?
Sounds like a Dog Pound to me. Freight Dog Pound, that is.
vroll1800 is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 06:11 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed View Post
If the age is raised again, it should not result in furloughs or delayed career expectations.

Putting aside long term company financial health, expansion, mergers, etc., the most important factor in one’s career is retirements. To actually state that raising the age won’t affect career expectations shows a complete lack of understanding of the situation. The main reason the majors have been hiring like crazy for the last few years is the 5 year extension the old guys got ran out in 2014 and regular retirements began again. Additionally, raising the age might not result in furloughs now but should they come, there will be pilots on the street who would not otherwise be there because the seniors stayed and less were hired prior to the furlough.

Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed View Post
Sure, before either happens, there will be some room to play with due to demand.
Sounds like you’ve got your finger on the pulse of the entire industry’s hiring/furlough plans. Guess where the “demand” comes from that will supposedly allow some “room to play with”? Yup – the retirements you seem to think have no effect on anyone’s career.


Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed View Post
Sure, hiring phases and the economy will have cycled a few times and in that time, or hell, we might even go to single or no pilot ops, but so what.
So what? I’m not real worried about single pilot ops much less no pilot ops, but “so what”? Really? Do you bother to actually think before you start the stream of consciousness? What even is your point here?


Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed View Post
Of course this will not be popular with those nearing retirement (most of us know we what we got into and we already got a 5 year extension) or with the airlines (raise the damn pay and bennies).
“Most of us”? Who is that? The pilots hired in the last decade who didn’t have to wait on seniority and upgrades because of the age change? Guess what junior, “Most of us” where already here by then and got in when the age was 60. Take a look at any major airline’s seniority list and you’ll see most pilots were hired before the age change. Looking at many who were hired after the age change, don’t you realize that a lot of them would have been there much sooner without the age change?


“Raise the damn pay and bennies”? Another WTF statement. One of the reasons major airlines have any incentive to raise the pay/benefits is to remain competitive during periods of hiring. You think this incentive remains when an age change gives them additional pilots they weren’t planning on having available? Does the pilot group have more or less leverage during negotiations if there are an abundance of pilots on the property? Do you think it’s a coincidence that every major airline has raised pay and been hiring since the end of the 5 years from the first age change?

“5-year extension” might be how you see it, since it appears you weren’t here to live it. A lot of us didn’t want an “extension”. More like a stagnation. We didn’t want to wait an extra 5 years to hold better lines, better paying equipment, earn our high-5 for retirement, etc. Many of us didn’t (or still don’t) want to work until we’re 65. Fortunately some of us still have that choice. 20-30 years from now you might feel a bit differently about getting an “extension” to your career.

But we did and it’s done. I’m over it. But I have to speak up when it’s clear you are either attempting to revise history by downplaying this event (and possibly future changes to the age) or more likely have absolutely no clue what you’re trying to talk about.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 07:27 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 400
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
Putting aside long term company financial health, expansion, mergers, etc., the most important factor in one’s career is retirements. To actually state that raising the age won’t affect career expectations shows a complete lack of understanding of the situation. The main reason the majors have been hiring like crazy for the last few years is the 5 year extension the old guys got ran out in 2014 and regular retirements began again. Additionally, raising the age might not result in furloughs now but should they come, there will be pilots on the street who would not otherwise be there because the seniors stayed and less were hired prior to the furlough.

Sounds like you’ve got your finger on the pulse of the entire industry’s hiring/furlough plans. Guess where the “demand” comes from that will supposedly allow some “room to play with”? Yup – the retirements you seem to think have no effect on anyone’s career.

So what? I’m not real worried about single pilot ops much less no pilot ops, but “so what”? Really? Do you bother to actually think before you start the stream of consciousness? What even is your point here?

“Most of us”? Who is that? The pilots hired in the last decade who didn’t have to wait on seniority and upgrades because of the age change? Guess what junior, “Most of us” where already here by then and got in when the age was 60. Take a look at any major airline’s seniority list and you’ll see most pilots were hired before the age change. Looking at many who were hired after the age change, don’t you realize that a lot of them would have been there much sooner without the age change?

“Raise the damn pay and bennies”? Another WTF statement. One of the reasons major airlines have any incentive to raise the pay/benefits is to remain competitive during periods of hiring. You think this incentive remains when an age change gives them additional pilots they weren’t planning on having available? Does the pilot group have more or less leverage during negotiations if there are an abundance of pilots on the property? Do you think it’s a coincidence that every major airline has raised pay and been hiring since the end of the 5 years from the first age change?

“5-year extension” might be how you see it, since it appears you weren’t here to live it. A lot of us didn’t want an “extension”. More like a stagnation. We didn’t want to wait an extra 5 years to hold better lines, better paying equipment, earn our high-5 for retirement, etc. Many of us didn’t (or still don’t) want to work until we’re 65. Fortunately some of us still have that choice. 20-30 years from now you might feel a bit differently about getting an “extension” to your career.

But we did and it’s done. I’m over it. But I have to speak up when it’s clear you are either attempting to revise history by downplaying this event (and possibly future changes to the age) or more likely have absolutely no clue what you’re trying to talk about.
I can now see why you misinterpreted what I said in the beginning which set the tone for the rest of your fly off the handle post.

If the age is raised, it should be conditional in that it doesn't result in furloughs or delayed career expectations. Never mind the rest of the post that points to such. Better? Is context not your thing, Junior?

Before you reply, take a breath, think and don't pop a blood vessel.

Last edited by Ludicrous Speed; 06-01-2017 at 07:40 AM.
Ludicrous Speed is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 07:34 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 400
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
Anyone with ANY experience in the airline business knows there is no such thing as "career expectations". Ask any Pan Am, Wien, Eastern, TWA, Capitol, Braniff, Midwest Express, Midway, etc. ad infinitium pilot what happened to their "career expectations".

Nothing is promised in piloting and wise pilots are prepared for the ups and downs of the career.
Point taken and I am well aware of airline history. The fact remains is that there is such a thing as career expectations. There is a reason that that the term is ubiquitous in contracts and other legal documents involving seniority list mergers. Anyone with ANY experience in the airline business knows that
Ludicrous Speed is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 08:31 AM
  #36  
Row 1A
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 55
Default

Why would anyone want to continue working past 65.
I've never heard anyone from their deathbed say "I wish I would've worked more".
Get a hobby. Enjoy your family & home life. We've all traveled enough during our working lives.
Whaledrivr is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 12:59 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,479
Default

Originally Posted by Whaledrivr View Post
Why would anyone want to continue working past 65. I've never heard anyone from their deathbed say "I wish I would've worked more".
True. But with all the L/O time, at least I can head west with the satisfaction of knowing it physically impossible to have adjusted the antenna any more
METO Guido is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 02:10 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Retired
Posts: 651
Default

Originally Posted by Whaledrivr View Post
... We've all traveled enough during our working lives.
Could you please explain this to my wife?

She has grand plans. I don't want to leave the zip code.
742Dash is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 08:05 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Originally Posted by Whaledrivr View Post
Why would anyone want to continue working past 65.
I've never heard anyone from their deathbed say "I wish I would've worked more".
Your circle of contacts must be limited to the millennial crowd.

However, don't dispare, you'll get the left seat.... eventually hopefully that is, before the DARPA robot that can land an airplane doesn't replace the younger generation.
captjns is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 06:29 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,479
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
Your circle of contacts must be limited to the millennial crowd.


When I encounter millennials here and there , do I like what I see? Yes, for the most part, very much. Boomers, having qualified everything with; "play the game, don't believe in it." Who's at fault if they listened?
METO Guido is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Herc130AV8R
Military
25
03-22-2008 05:22 PM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 07:13 AM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM
Dane Bramage
Major
61
11-01-2006 08:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices