Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX Negotiation Update >

FDX Negotiation Update

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX Negotiation Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2014, 08:16 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
... since the "Bridge" or "Interim" contract, which we were told would not reset the negotiations clock. Remember, we were told the NMB smiles on our process, and will count the 2 years of "Mid-term Talks" or "Interim Discussions" as part of our RLA negotiations process.


We're closing in on our 4th year and 4th peak since our last real contract became amendable.


.
Besides "smiles", which is nice, we do have a little more going for us.

Two raises that we would not have had during the interim.
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:24 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
I'm not arguing with you, but ...

Why should individuals make personal sacrifices for a cause when every message from leadership conveys that things are just fine?

Our Strategic Preparedness and Strike Center is a one-room repurposed office in the already overcrowded MEC office space. If the MEC isn't serious about this, why should a rank and file member get serious?

.
This is bass ackwards thinking.

You should be asking yourself questions like, "What if we called for a strike and no one even called in sick?"

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.

This needs to be a grass roots effort. We need to show the MEC what we want starting with our individual actions.
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:26 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
Besides "smiles", which is nice, we do have a little more going for us.

Two raises that we would not have had during the interim.

Please don't say we gave up our leverage with the FDA stuff.

Your position is a play on John Kerry -

"You were for it (FDA LOA 1) before you were against it (adding CGN)."
Once again, the real point is being missed.

We are in YEAR 4 of contract negotiations!
Busboy is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:27 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
Once again, the real point is being missed.

We are in YEAR 4 of contract negotiations!
Then act like it!
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:36 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
onetime's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 777 F/O
Posts: 340
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
I'm not arguing with you, but ...

Why should individuals make personal sacrifices for a cause when every message from leadership conveys that things are just fine?

Our Strategic Preparedness and Strike Center is a one-room repurposed office in the already overcrowded MEC office space. If the MEC isn't serious about this, why should a rank and file member get serious?
.
I don't see flying what you bid, nothing more, nothing less, as a personal sacrifice. Maybe that's just me. There are times to get EXTRA, but now is not that time IMHO. We should not need union leadership to tell us that. That said, peak after a contract is signed should be a feast for all who want to partake.

As for words from leadership, they are telling us everything they want us to hear, not necessarily everything that is happening.
onetime is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:37 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
Then act like it!
I believe that was Tony's point.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:41 AM
  #27  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post

Besides "smiles", which is nice, we do have a little more going for us.

Two raises that we would not have had during the interim.

Your position is a play on John Kerry -

"You were for it (FDA LOA 1) before you were against it (adding CGN)."

I would think you could understand the difference between negotiating between Section 6 (FDA LOA) and DURING Section 6 (4 year 9 month limit to make CGN possible).


The average FedEx pilot didn't even have Pay Raise in his Top 5 CBA Improvements, but we couldn't wait for a complete CBA Negotiation to get an hourly rate increase? We've lost more in Accepted Fares abuse over the last 3 years than we gained with 2 pay bumps, and we only memorialized moving the line on our pay rates over time graph to the right, leaving a permanent gap under the slope we had.

Yes, we had leverage, and we squandered it, but that's history. Where are we today? Any closer to achieving your Top 5 CBA Improvements?
TonyC is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:44 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
Then act like it!
I am having a bake sale to raise money for an advertisement in the WSJ and my family and I are going to do some informational picketing next week at the local FDX facility. Want to donate or join me?
Busboy is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:47 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD11HOG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD11 F/O
Posts: 653
Default

.[/QUOTEAgreed. But in the future, I wish the union would hold these events at a venue the respects our second amendment rights. I have not been able to attend one yet due to Buffalo Wild Wings polices.[/QUOTE]

A perfect example of what is preventing us from getting substantial contract improvements. The idea of FedEx pilots actually taking action is ludicrous because we have continued to put ourself before the group. It's always "somebody do something, just not me." Where a lanyard? "It doesn't matter." Don't fly open time? "It fits my schedule" Come to a union function? "No, corporation Buffalo WW is against the constitution and wants to destroy the America I Love" . Rant on the internet uselessly? Ok! (This post as an example)
An object thinking of itself continues to think of itself until acted on by an outside force.
To lighten the mood: At least the vacation won't have concessions. It was listed as mostly complete.
MD11HOG is offline  
Old 05-09-2014, 08:55 AM
  #30  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by onetime View Post

I don't see flying what you bid, nothing more, nothing less, as a personal sacrifice. Maybe that's just me.

It's not just you, but it's certainly not everyone. We have guys on here bragging about bidding lines that are bought up and then adding a trip here or there to beef it up, and nobody blinks.


Originally Posted by onetime View Post

There are times to get EXTRA, but now is not that time IMHO. We should not need union leadership to tell us that.


As for words from leadership, they are telling us everything they want us to hear, ...

PiBS is still on the table.

What you should be hearing is we are very unhappy about the progress of negotiations, and we will be calling on you to demonstrate our collective displeasure. We will begin Informational Picketing to protest FedEx's intransigence and bad-faith negotiations.


But, that might hurt somebody's feelings, so enjoy your extra flying.






.
TonyC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevets
Regional
215
07-24-2013 09:46 AM
Lindy
Cargo
35
02-07-2010 12:27 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
61
03-19-2009 08:40 AM
DLax85
Cargo
14
09-17-2008 03:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices