Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX QA Observations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2014, 02:19 PM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
3pointlanding's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 307
Default

I forgot. I do work for FedEx
3pointlanding is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 02:25 PM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Unknown Rider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by 3pointlanding View Post
Max
To answer your question
No I am not a FedEx pilot nor have ever been one
I flew for brand x and worked in the ALPA local grievance and I did spend several weeks walking the line
I do not work for or with management
I do not have anything to do with ASAP, or the QA program. I do not know how the QA program is run other than what I read on this forum but it is obvious the union is not happy with it and I have only been trying to pass along my knowledge and correct misconceptions since I do have a lot of experience with IOSA, the FAA, IOSA, and the CMOS. Obviously I failed

Happy now?


So here's another question. How is it that you quote from the FedEx FOM and SMS manual if you are not a FedEx employee?
Unknown Rider is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 02:36 PM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
3pointlanding's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 307
Default

Did you know that the company sends the manuals to and IOSA AO and the CMO has copies of all the manuals approved and accepted?
3pointlanding is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 03:17 PM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by 3pointlanding View Post
Did you know that the company sends the manuals to and IOSA AO and the CMO has copies of all the manuals approved and accepted?
I'm not sure you answered the question? Please post link where these manuals are available?
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 03:24 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Unknown Rider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by 3pointlanding View Post
Did you know that the company sends the manuals to and IOSA AO and the CMO has copies of all the manuals approved and accepted?
Answer a question with a question- yep, I know that tactic. How about you answer a question with a straight answer, else we'll know you for the imposter you are.
Unknown Rider is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 05:13 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MeXC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default

Originally Posted by 3pointlanding View Post
I forgot. I do work for FedEx
Edited for content
MeXC is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 06:54 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,193
Default

Tony - Well Done

On the other hand, the veracity and credibility of other main participant in this thread is shot

Let's all move on to other, more useful, topics

Last edited by DLax85; 08-03-2014 at 07:07 PM.
DLax85 is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 07:46 PM
  #158  
gets every day off
 
Nitefrater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Retired MD11 Capt
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by 3pointlanding View Post
Did you know that the company sends the manuals to and IOSA AO and the CMO has copies of all the manuals approved and accepted?
The point that seems to escape you is that while many of your points are likely true, they are also completely and utterly irrelevant to the majority of posters here.

IOSA is a program of IATA, which is itself a "Trade Association" of airline management. FedEx has joined the IATA frat. I haven't. Neither have you. As an airline management trade association, IATA has certain goals and agendas. IATA is not a friend of labor. Their goals and agendas are frequently at odds with those of the people their member airlines employ. (e.g. see IATA's "liberalization" policy). IATA's policies are in no way, shape or form, regulatory. They do, however, lobby for regulations in line with their goals and agenda.

The pilots employed by FedEx also have a "trade association" (ALPA), who also doesn't have regulatory authority. They also lobby for regulations in line with their goals and agendas.

In this regard, IATA and ALPA are at the same level of the regulatory arena (tho the playing field can by no means be construed as being "level").

To rehash some background: One of the pillars of an effective SMS, ASAP, was held up by FedEx management for over a year over the issue of whether ASAP reports could be used for discipline. The FAA doesn’t think this is a good idea, ALPA doesn’t think this is a good idea, IATA doesn’t think this is a good idea. AFAIK, FedEx management is the ONLY entity involved with ASAP who thinks this is a good idea. FedEx management apparently is of the opinion that ANY information that is known, by whatever means, can and should be grist for the discipline mill. Despite eventually coming to an agreement on the use of ASAP data, we have multiple anecdotal reports of ASAP data being used by FedEx management in manners proscribed by the agreement.

Now, FedEx decides to buy in to one of IATAs frat rules (a “QA” subset of SMS), but they chose to do so without seeking the buy-in of their pilot group, despite the general consensus, even within IATA, that such a buy-in is essential to the best effectiveness of a QA program. FedEx previously tried a QA program (LOSA), but it was administered by an outside vendor, and apparently didn’t give FedEx what they really wanted in a QA program. What might this be, you ask? (discipline?)

FedEx builds their own QA program, one that uses Check Airmen as the observers. Check Airmen who were interviewed by and selected by management, and who draw an additional stipend from management for performing CA duties. Who can be fired by management at management’s whim. To supplement this observer corps, they interview and select a cadre of First Officers, advertising the position as a management apprenticeship. For this apprenticeship they are also paid, by management, an additional payment rumored to be in the neighborhood of the value of 30 pieces of silver. They tell the crew force that the observers are NOT there to observe the crew (but they HAVE to be in the cockpit). They will write reports that the crew will not see, (indeed, the crew doesn’t even see the questions the observers are answering). The crew is told that the reports will be deidentified, by unidentified personnel who are selected and paid by management, And that the reports will never be used for any form of discipline. Does anyone in the crew force believe this? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? And then they insult our concerns with a tone-deaf joke about “black helicopters.”

The bottom line is that the majority of the crew force at FedEx doesn’t give a rat’s a$$ about an IATA program, that in the FedEx iteration, seems to serve management’s goals at our expense. Perhaps, in some future unicorn and rainbow universe, if FedEx management started giving a rat’s a$$ about the goals and agendas of MY “trade association”, I’d start caring about (some of) the goals and agendas of their “trade association”
Nitefrater is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 09:19 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 260
Default

And nope, they don't have to ride in the cockpit...and until there is a MOU on this program, like LOSA, they can enjoy their international catering in the back....
HKFlyr is offline  
Old 08-03-2014, 09:20 PM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 260
Default

nice post NF and Tony, by the way...

And I agree, time to move on, remember, never argue with an idiot...or wrestle a pig...
HKFlyr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
vagabond
Cargo
83
07-14-2010 07:27 AM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
61
03-19-2009 08:40 AM
CloudSailor
Cargo
18
05-19-2008 10:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices