FDX - MD-11 Disputed pairings JUN15
06-01-2015 | 01:57 PM
#15
Thread Starter
Organizational Learning
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
You are correct. Under Domestic rules, I can finagle the scheduled flight time with a minimum of 10 consecutive hours of rest, if that pairing is flown as a standalone pairing, with no hubturn before or after.
Why would I want to be in a situation where it's even an issue?
Why don't you tell us why you'd like to fly this pairing as scheduled?
As of now, the FOs are showing 100% support, no takers.
Captains, on the other hand, have picked up the 06JUN and 27JUN pairings.
.
Why would I want to be in a situation where it's even an issue?
Why don't you tell us why you'd like to fly this pairing as scheduled?
As of now, the FOs are showing 100% support, no takers.
Captains, on the other hand, have picked up the 06JUN and 27JUN pairings.
.
06-01-2015 | 02:03 PM
#16
Thread Starter
Organizational Learning
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
You're probably right. I had forgotten about his grand entrance to APC:
Hey JetJock, I agree with MaxKts. Why don't you take your 3300+ posts, your A and B plans and enjoy your retirement. You are worse than an old retired AF O-6 that still goes to the BX so he will get saluted driving on base to park in the reserved parking up front. Please for the love of God, shut your cake hole and let us deal with FedEx. I promise you and everyone else this, when I retire I won't bother you either.
.
Hey JetJock, I agree with MaxKts. Why don't you take your 3300+ posts, your A and B plans and enjoy your retirement. You are worse than an old retired AF O-6 that still goes to the BX so he will get saluted driving on base to park in the reserved parking up front. Please for the love of God, shut your cake hole and let us deal with FedEx. I promise you and everyone else this, when I retire I won't bother you either.
.
06-01-2015 | 02:09 PM
#17
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
The layover could be as short as 10 hours and still be legal for 8 in 24 purposes. You seem to be up on the FARs as you post them frequently. I'm not saying it's a good trip I was just wondering why you were complaining about a long layover and implying a shorter layover would be better so you could just sleep once.
06-01-2015 | 02:23 PM
#18
Thread Starter
Organizational Learning
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
Oh, sorry I didn't answer you fast enough. I've been a little busy with work and life, but I should have made you a higher priority. I did make yours the first response when I got back to my keyboard today. 
I see, you just don't agree with the designation as a Disputed Pairing, so you wanted to stir up trouble. Gotcha. Thanks for playing.
.
.
06-01-2015 | 03:11 PM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
The layover could be as short as 10 hours and still be legal for 8 in 24 purposes. You seem to be up on the FARs as you post them frequently. I'm not saying it's a good trip I was just wondering why you were complaining about a long layover and implying a shorter layover would be better so you could just sleep once.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
