Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Age 65 effect on FDX-UPS upgrades >

Age 65 effect on FDX-UPS upgrades

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Age 65 effect on FDX-UPS upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2007, 02:51 PM
  #131  
gets every day off
 
Nitefrater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Retired MD11 Capt
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Thanks, it is indeed a cool car and I came within a hairs breath of owning this one.
"Coolest car I never owned, Mav..."
Nitefrater is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 06:14 AM
  #132  
Line Holder
 
Coffee Bitch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
Default "Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements".

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld View Post
Age 65 will not be that big of a deal, especially at UPS/FDX. You'd have to assume that every single 60 year old will stay until 65. That won't happen. It'll probably be 50%. Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements. We are creating additional capt seats and age 65 has nothing to do with it. AGe 60 is the age for full retirement under our current contract. So anyone flying past 60 will be doing it at a discount because he could be making 60k a year in retirement anyway. Health problems become exponential as guys turn 60 so many will lose their medical. Those that can pass the physicals deserve to fly IMO.
"Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements."

"Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements."

"Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements."

YGTBSM ???
Coffee Bitch is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 07:05 AM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

[QUOTE=Coffee *****;123993
"Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements."

YGTBSM ???[/QUOTE]

Forget it........he is new to this business
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 07:30 PM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by Coffee ***** View Post
"Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements."

YGTBSM ???

well, 19 widebodies (net, 27 deliveries scheduled, 8 DC10s pulled for conversion, per FDX Mx website) at 14 or 15 pilots per jet (crew figures from a CP email) does seem to trump 126 guys turning 60 in CY 07.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 02-25-2007, 09:38 PM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot View Post
well, 19 widebodies (net, 27 deliveries scheduled, 8 DC10s pulled for conversion, per FDX Mx website) at 14 or 15 pilots per jet (crew figures from a CP email) does seem to trump 126 guys turning 60 in CY 07.
Depends on your seniority...

There comes a point in most pilot's careers, when it's less meaningful how many are coming in behind you. The important thing is how many leave in front of you.

Before you get too hostile...I, like everyone else, like the growth. But personally, I'd rather be # 700 out of 4800, than #826 out of 5050.
Busboy is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 12:00 AM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by Coffee ***** View Post
"Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements."

"Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements."

"Besides our seat progression is driven by growth and expansion, not retirements."

YGTBSM ???
I was talking about UPS idiot. Go pound sand.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 04:25 AM
  #137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld View Post
I was talking about UPS idiot. Go pound sand.

I wouldn't call any UPS pilot an idiot. But you are entitled to your opinion.
Gunter is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 07:25 AM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
Depends on your seniority...

There comes a point in most pilot's careers, when it's less meaningful how many are coming in behind you. The important thing is how many leave in front of you.

Before you get too hostile...I, like everyone else, like the growth. But personally, I'd rather be # 700 out of 4800, than #826 out of 5050.
True, but if you've got a 3 digit seniority number, you have probably "seat progressed" as far as you can, and it's all about schedules and QOL. When you're 3000 out of 4800, the 150 or so WB Cap slots that come with 20 new WB jets can make a bigger difference than 125 retirements, in either seat progression or QOL. And it sure seems like most of those on this forum are newbies to guys with less than 10 years. Not so many old heads. I count myself as both, due to prior airlines, but that's just me.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 07:55 AM
  #139  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot View Post
. And it sure seems like most of those on this forum are newbies to guys with less than 10 years. Not so many old heads. I count myself as both, due to prior airlines, but that's just me.
A fair number of the newbies can say the same thing these days. The nice thing about retirements vs. growth is that retirements can help in both good and bad times. They help with progression(albeit slow) and they also help in downturns as they can mitigate the number of people furloughed and how long they are furloughed for.

Last edited by Daniel Larusso; 02-26-2007 at 08:00 AM.
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 08:10 AM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by Daniel Larusso View Post
A fair number of the newbies can say the same thing these days. The nice thing about retirements vs. growth is that retirements can help in both good and bad times. They help with progression(albeit slow) and they also help in downturns as they can mitigate the number of people furloughed and how long they are furloughed for.
True, but you never hear "30 guys went to the panel instead of retiring, so we're going to furlough."
fdx727pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
29
05-22-2007 07:51 AM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices