Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
ATI/ABX new hire info? >

ATI/ABX new hire info?

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

ATI/ABX new hire info?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2016 | 01:55 PM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WingOffLight
They are doing friends and family according to another site. There was a post that the DO's kid interviewed with them.

Another said the FE's were coming back after getting ATP certs.
It probably wasn't RE's kids I don't think. The only family member of the new management team that flew was JV's son AFAIK. He flew for Lakes but I thought he only had a few hundred hours and was on their 135 side of things. I could be wrong and really don't care. I don't know if the FE thing is accurate or not either. When the DC8s were parked, FEs with pilot certificates were given some chance to fly the 767 as an IRO if certain qualifications were met. I think most that could took it. At least that was before the merger.
Reply
Old 03-25-2016 | 02:27 PM
  #142  
Kougarok's Avatar
El Capitan
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NCR757dxr
It probably wasn't RE's kids I don't think. The only family member of the new management team that flew was JV's son AFAIK. He flew for Lakes but I thought he only had a few hundred hours and was on their 135 side of things. I could be wrong and really don't care. I don't know if the FE thing is accurate or not either. When the DC8s were parked, FEs with pilot certificates were given some chance to fly the 767 as an IRO if certain qualifications were met. I think most that could took it. At least that was before the merger.
You're forgetting about the Cappy FE's.
Reply
Old 03-25-2016 | 03:00 PM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kougarok
You're forgetting about the Cappy FE's.
True. I thought most were PFEs though.
Reply
Old 03-25-2016 | 06:42 PM
  #144  
awacs's Avatar
Back on line
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 2
From: Out of the sim, back in the real!
Default Called today

All

Called today, interview in 4 April.


AWACS
Reply
Old 03-25-2016 | 07:50 PM
  #145  
Layover Master
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 9
From: Seated
Default

Originally Posted by WingOffLight
They are doing friends and family according to another site. There was a post that the DO's kid interviewed with them.

Another said the FE's were coming back after getting ATP certs.

I'm not being negative to your app but if those are your quals depending on your age you may be considered a short timer. Your young, clean and would jump at higher pay and better life.

If I was hiring there I'd look for good flying record with no violations and/or something that prohibit a major snagging you. Those are long term that once hired won't leave. Plus they won't rock the boat or strike with no where to go.

Sorry that's the viewpoints from HR and management...
No problem believing that. Makes sense. Or at least that's what I keep telling myself.
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 04:54 AM
  #146  
Thread Starter
New Hire
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by awacs
All

Called today, interview in 4 April.


AWACS
Who are you interviewing with?
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 04:57 PM
  #147  
awacs's Avatar
Back on line
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 2
From: Out of the sim, back in the real!
Default

Ati

awacs
Reply
Old 03-28-2016 | 05:51 AM
  #148  
New Hire
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

After reading this and other threads Ill pass on the ATI interview. I can't even believe I'm contributing to this Co's BS but Im attracted to ignorance I guess.

Just to enlighten Candygram, Larry, Tabdata, wtfe

Coming from an expat with over 10+yrs Sandbox/Stan

The American civilian contractors (not civilians directly employed by DoD or DoS) couldn't ever take fire/damage or report it openly. The reason being that you guys despite being in a warzone were still civilians and under the regulatory authority of the FAA. Depending on your theater the rules changed over the years but for the most part went like this. Ill go plain language too. "You are required to report all damage resulting from hostile fire. You are required to report any incident involving enemy action." Cough Cough stomp stomp "If you do the FAA is will issue a TFR and civilians will be sitting on the ramp" -------As time went on what was considered dangerous changed. Later small arms of "under" 12.7mm were not considered dangerous to larger aircraft into the major basses because of their limited range. If you guys flew Iraq you may remember N (civilian) aircraft couldn't enter certain areas. The above is why. You could have taken an RPG up the pipe and I promise your company would have claimed FOD or small arms in fear of loosing the flying, which paid quite well.

I dont need the lecture I know you guys were doing it for absolutely NO extra pay setting a new standard in all of our lives.
Reply
Old 03-29-2016 | 08:56 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Default

Amen brother bravo! Too many John Wayne wannabes out there. ATI is covered up with them. I know of what you speak.
Reply
Old 03-30-2016 | 11:21 AM
  #150  
PittsDriver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Default

I was offered an interview as well. It says a lot to me that its on your own dime to get to and from the interview.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cheyenne Driver
Foreign
0
09-08-2008 04:15 PM
CACTUSCAPT
Foreign
14
07-29-2008 12:27 PM
U-I pilot
Part 135
1
03-22-2008 03:20 PM
nwa7
Part 135
1
01-03-2007 06:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices