ATI/ABX new hire info?
#141
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
It probably wasn't RE's kids I don't think. The only family member of the new management team that flew was JV's son AFAIK. He flew for Lakes but I thought he only had a few hundred hours and was on their 135 side of things. I could be wrong and really don't care. I don't know if the FE thing is accurate or not either. When the DC8s were parked, FEs with pilot certificates were given some chance to fly the 767 as an IRO if certain qualifications were met. I think most that could took it. At least that was before the merger.
#142
It probably wasn't RE's kids I don't think. The only family member of the new management team that flew was JV's son AFAIK. He flew for Lakes but I thought he only had a few hundred hours and was on their 135 side of things. I could be wrong and really don't care. I don't know if the FE thing is accurate or not either. When the DC8s were parked, FEs with pilot certificates were given some chance to fly the 767 as an IRO if certain qualifications were met. I think most that could took it. At least that was before the merger.
#145
Layover Master
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 9
From: Seated
They are doing friends and family according to another site. There was a post that the DO's kid interviewed with them.
Another said the FE's were coming back after getting ATP certs.
I'm not being negative to your app but if those are your quals depending on your age you may be considered a short timer. Your young, clean and would jump at higher pay and better life.
If I was hiring there I'd look for good flying record with no violations and/or something that prohibit a major snagging you. Those are long term that once hired won't leave. Plus they won't rock the boat or strike with no where to go.
Sorry that's the viewpoints from HR and management...
Another said the FE's were coming back after getting ATP certs.
I'm not being negative to your app but if those are your quals depending on your age you may be considered a short timer. Your young, clean and would jump at higher pay and better life.
If I was hiring there I'd look for good flying record with no violations and/or something that prohibit a major snagging you. Those are long term that once hired won't leave. Plus they won't rock the boat or strike with no where to go.
Sorry that's the viewpoints from HR and management...
#148
New Hire
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
After reading this and other threads Ill pass on the ATI interview. I can't even believe I'm contributing to this Co's BS but Im attracted to ignorance I guess.
Just to enlighten Candygram, Larry, Tabdata, wtfe
Coming from an expat with over 10+yrs Sandbox/Stan
The American civilian contractors (not civilians directly employed by DoD or DoS) couldn't ever take fire/damage or report it openly. The reason being that you guys despite being in a warzone were still civilians and under the regulatory authority of the FAA. Depending on your theater the rules changed over the years but for the most part went like this. Ill go plain language too. "You are required to report all damage resulting from hostile fire. You are required to report any incident involving enemy action." Cough Cough stomp stomp "If you do the FAA is will issue a TFR and civilians will be sitting on the ramp" -------As time went on what was considered dangerous changed. Later small arms of "under" 12.7mm were not considered dangerous to larger aircraft into the major basses because of their limited range. If you guys flew Iraq you may remember N (civilian) aircraft couldn't enter certain areas. The above is why. You could have taken an RPG up the pipe and I promise your company would have claimed FOD or small arms in fear of loosing the flying, which paid quite well.
I dont need the lecture I know you guys were doing it for absolutely NO extra pay setting a new standard in all of our lives.
Just to enlighten Candygram, Larry, Tabdata, wtfe
Coming from an expat with over 10+yrs Sandbox/Stan
The American civilian contractors (not civilians directly employed by DoD or DoS) couldn't ever take fire/damage or report it openly. The reason being that you guys despite being in a warzone were still civilians and under the regulatory authority of the FAA. Depending on your theater the rules changed over the years but for the most part went like this. Ill go plain language too. "You are required to report all damage resulting from hostile fire. You are required to report any incident involving enemy action." Cough Cough stomp stomp "If you do the FAA is will issue a TFR and civilians will be sitting on the ramp" -------As time went on what was considered dangerous changed. Later small arms of "under" 12.7mm were not considered dangerous to larger aircraft into the major basses because of their limited range. If you guys flew Iraq you may remember N (civilian) aircraft couldn't enter certain areas. The above is why. You could have taken an RPG up the pipe and I promise your company would have claimed FOD or small arms in fear of loosing the flying, which paid quite well.
I dont need the lecture I know you guys were doing it for absolutely NO extra pay setting a new standard in all of our lives.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



