Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Compass Airlines
Compass Updates 2: Revenge of the Sit >

Compass Updates 2: Revenge of the Sit

Search

Notices
Compass Airlines Regional Airline

Compass Updates 2: Revenge of the Sit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2019 | 08:49 AM
  #1841  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Default

TSH is so disgusting, this cancer needs to be removed from the industry.
Old 03-19-2019 | 12:14 PM
  #1842  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 384
Likes: 1
Default

Is the flow back agreement with DL still intact? I know the flow ended a very longtime ago, and as it looks today it would never be used, but curious if the LOA/MOU still remains and is part of the current contract extension
Old 03-19-2019 | 01:30 PM
  #1843  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
Is the flow back agreement with DL still intact? I know the flow ended a very longtime ago, and as it looks today it would never be used, but curious if the LOA/MOU still remains and is part of the current contract extension
Congrats on the contract extension. For how long is this one?
Old 03-19-2019 | 02:00 PM
  #1844  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
If it is like the TSA agreement, the letters that deny hiring outside the flow to those that apply to F9 are from the F9 recruiting department, not TSA. What we were told was F9s legal department determined they could not hire outside the flow due to language placed in the agreement by TSH legal counsel.

So this is apparently an internal decision at F9 based on language in the agreement and has nothing to do with ALPA. The flow was negotiated between both companies and ALPA was not involved.
Poking around a bit in the TSA subforum, it sounds like the restriction comes from TSH, which wanted to restrict the number of pilots going from TSA to F9.

Under the old F9 contract, this would have been a non-issue, as the number of CP people going to F9 back then was minuscule (<10 per year). But now with the new and improved F9 contract, I'm guessing TSH insisted on the same restriction with CP. So we probably just got the same agreement that TSA did, except it's 2-4/month instead of 2.

I would be surprised though if our union challenged this at all.
Old 03-19-2019 | 05:24 PM
  #1845  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

Originally Posted by morerightrudder
Poking around a bit in the TSA subforum, it sounds like the restriction comes from TSH, which wanted to restrict the number of pilots going from TSA to F9.

Under the old F9 contract, this would have been a non-issue, as the number of CP people going to F9 back then was minuscule (<10 per year). But now with the new and improved F9 contract, I'm guessing TSH insisted on the same restriction with CP. So we probably just got the same agreement that TSA did, except it's 2-4/month instead of 2.

I would be surprised though if our union challenged this at all.
TSA's agreement is 2-4 a month. TSA hasn't been anywhere near an appropriate staffing level so they have only flowed 2 a month.
Old 03-19-2019 | 08:59 PM
  #1846  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by week
IMHO it’s an obstacle to our career progression. I certainly would have voted no. Now all of us have no shot at moving on to F9 outside of a tiny and distant flow window. With their new pay rates, you would have seen normal attrition of 2-5 a month to them without the flow...... not 24 a year with the flow
Old 03-19-2019 | 09:05 PM
  #1847  
koala98g's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: 135 FNG
Default

Originally Posted by Stan Dingbye
In sequence:
Flow time
Cleared direct BTG
Mach .74 for spacing
Shasta yay
I can see Crater Lake
RT 090 for metering
LT 270 for metering
Direct BTG, Normal speed
RT 090 for metering
LT 270 for metering
Cleared direct BTG, Normal speed
After HAWKZ, descend/maintain 4000’, slow to 170
No, you can’t land on the inside.
Old 03-19-2019 | 09:16 PM
  #1848  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 859
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by koala98g
In sequence:
Flow time
Cleared direct BTG
Mach .74 for spacing
Shasta yay
I can see Crater Lake
RT 090 for metering
LT 270 for metering
Direct BTG, Normal speed
RT 090 for metering
LT 270 for metering
Cleared direct BTG, Normal speed
After HAWKZ, descend/maintain 4000’, slow to 170
No, you can’t land on the inside.
Landing Fuel: 2451
Old 03-20-2019 | 05:47 AM
  #1849  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Default

so really the “flow” is just management blocking us from career progression, great. Maybe if we’re lucky we can flow 1 a month to UA while they throw our apps in the trash.

My money says we never, ever flow more than 2 a month. Just TSH’s way of blocking us from leaving for F9 in droves with their new contract. Scummy move
Old 03-20-2019 | 08:17 AM
  #1850  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Default

Well frontier is complicit in this too, don't forget that.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3inthegreen
Compass Airlines
140
04-14-2015 03:44 PM
Fecking EJet
Mesa Airlines
28
10-15-2014 03:09 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
drosenst
Compass Airlines
12
11-19-2008 06:32 PM
PinnacleFO
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
07-22-2008 04:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices