![]() |
Originally Posted by week
(Post 2661157)
From the latest comply publications...
- pilots used EarPods while on duty in uniform from morning van time to check out time, including while interacting with gate agents and crewmembers, even after repeatedly missing communications. - pilots, while being observed by the FAA jumpseater, decided to pushback before doing the before start check, electing to complete it during pushback roll. Do we really have pilots working at this company that are this level of stupid? |
|
Originally Posted by week
(Post 2661157)
From the latest comply publications...
- pilots used EarPods while on duty in uniform from morning van time to check out time, including while interacting with gate agents and crewmembers, even after repeatedly missing communications. - pilots, while being observed by the FAA jumpseater, decided to pushback before doing the before start check, electing to complete it during pushback roll. The knee jerk reaction will be to rename that check “Before Push”. |
Originally Posted by Anderair
(Post 2661576)
Has anyone referred an employee successfully? Can you PM me? I was gonna study the referral bonus manual on my sit in the terminal the other day but I listened to drake on my earbuds whilst in uniform instead. No but seriously throw me a bone and shoot me a PM.
|
Anyone else think it’s a bit ridiculous you aren’t supposed to use the Rnav procedures in the box to backup a visual? It’s visual, we are using references outside the aircraft, not poking holes through clouds without charts and approval. Having this backup seems to be far safer than not. Or just keep getting EGPWS alerts and using less accurate methods?
|
Originally Posted by Serenity
(Post 2661522)
I'm myopic and light sensitive. Sometimes I wear prescription sunglasses inside so that I don't have tears streaming down my cheeks as if my dog just died, while walking headlong into a wall. That's also a bad look for a pilot in uniform.
|
Originally Posted by PanchoBarnes
(Post 2662156)
Anyone else think it’s a bit ridiculous you aren’t supposed to use the Rnav procedures in the box to backup a visual? It’s visual, we are using references outside the aircraft, not poking holes through butts without charts and approval. Having this backup seems to be far safer than not. Or just keep getting EGPWS alerts and using less accurate methods?
|
Originally Posted by schlittykess
(Post 2662171)
If you're talking about the LAS stuff on comply, I'm pretty sure they just mean do not use that specific RNAV visual until it is approved by the FAA. Not that you can never use an RAV as a backup to a visual.
|
Originally Posted by Aviator147
(Post 2662284)
I'm not sure what the big deal is, that Visual into LAS has been in the box for at least 4 years and we used to do it all the time. Not sure what changed and caused issues. It was definitely more helpful than going in and building your own points seeing as it guided you away from terrain and gave VNAV guidance.
|
Building your own is pretty easy though. Klas.rw08/bearing/3/. And do a 10 mile. Throw the altitude based on the 3:1 rule, with a little situational awareness of altitude where you are intercepting it’s easy
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:43 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands